Revision summary
Gendered work splits unpaid care from paid public labour. It subsidises capitalist growth and human development of children. It also blocks women’s capabilities, skills, and voice. Oakley, Walby, Hartmann, and Sen frame the impact. NFHS and PLFS are the Indian files. Development that ignores time-use is a male public account.
Model answer
Introduction
The gender division of labour assigns men and women different work, especially unpaid care versus paid public work. Development as growth and capability is shaped by that split. A GDP story that ignores it misreads both progress and stagnation.
Body
The division
- Ann Oakley made housework visible as labour. Sylvia Walby placed the household as a patriarchal structure.
- PLFS low female labour-force rates often hide home-based and care work.
- R. W. Connell’s gender order organises masculinities around the breadwinner ideal.
Impacts on development
- Unpaid care subsidises the wage, which Marxist feminists after Heidi Hartmann named. Capitalist development rides that subsidy.
- Human development: children’s nutrition and schooling depend on that labour, as NFHS health files imply.
- Growth can rise while women’s time poverty deepens. Amartya Sen’s capabilities then diverge by sex.
- Informalisation often feminises the cheap shell of the economy.
Impacts that block development
- Exclusion from skills and assets slows the talent pool, against even Davis–Moore sorting.
- Violence and restricted mobility, in NFHS, cut public participation and entrepreneurship.
- Development policy that only adds microcredit without cutting care loads reproduces the split.
Reciprocal note
- Some development, such as public childcare, can re-divide labour. That is rare and fought for.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD GDL[Gender division of labour] --> CARE[Unpaid care subsidy] GDL --> CHEAP[Feminised informal wage] CARE --> DEV[Development as growth] GDL --> BLOCK[Lost capabilities] BLOCK --> UNEVEN[Uneven development]
Conclusion
The gender division of labour underwrites development by supplying unpaid care and cheap feminised work, and it blocks development by wasting capabilities and voice. Oakley, Walby, Hartmann, and Sen are the measures. Count GDP, then count time.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine how social movements come to an end. Illustrate with examples.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Does more female employment end the division?
Not if the double day remains. Public care and male unpaid work must shift too.
-
Is this only a household issue?
The household is a development institution. Factories and the state already use its output.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
'Ideal Types of Max Weber are mental constructs, they do not correspond to the reality. Give your views. -
2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyse the relevance of 'Pattern variables' in the study of social change. -
2020 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What are the reactions of R.K. Merton to the functionalism of social anthropologists ? Bring out the limitations of latent functions. -
2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Capitalism has brought increasing informalisation of work in society.Substantiate your answer. -
2020 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the consequences of Across Region marriage on kinship system in modern Indian society. -
2020 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How does Marx view social conflict as an essential element in social change? -
2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Present a sociological review on the 'new middle class' -
2019 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What, according to Merton, is the difference between 'unanticipated consequences' and 'latent functions' ? Give examples to elaborate
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Sociology
Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.
Sociology as Science
Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.
Sociology as Science
Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.