Revision summary
Movements end by success, co-option, repression, split, or exhaustion. Institutionalisation can be victory and an ending of the street form. Michels and Tilly explain oligarchy and closed opportunity. Labour deals, anti-corruption peaks, and NGO displacement illustrate. Women’s movements often cycle rather than die. Examine which form ended, not only the grievance.
Model answer
Introduction
Social movements are collective challenges with some continuity and a public claim. They end in several ways: success, split, repression, co-option, or fade. Ending is a process, not a single death certificate. Resource mobilisation and political process theories help name the paths.
Body
Paths of ending
- Success and institutionalisation: the claim becomes law or a party. The movement as extra-institutional actor thins. Indian independence organisations and some environmental PILs illustrate.
- Co-option: leaders enter office; the cadre loses the street. Robert Michels’s oligarchy is a cousin.
- Repression and labelling: the state criminalises the claim. Charles Tilly’s repertoires meet a closed opportunity.
- Faction and identity split: goals multiply until the “we” breaks.
- Exhaustion and generation change: emotions cool, after Durkheimian effervescence fades.
- Goal displacement: the organisation survives as an NGO while the movement ends.
Illustrations
- Many labour strikes end in a wage deal and demobilisation.
- Some new social movements, after Alain Touraine, become lifestyle scenes.
- Anti-corruption waves in India have peaked, entered parties, and receded as street force.
- Women’s movements rarely “end”; they cycle, which feminist scholars stress against a male riot model.
Examine
- “End” can mean the campaign, not the grievance.
- Success can look like death of the extra-institutional form.
- Informal labour movements may end for a season and return, as Breman’s workers circulate.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MOV[Social movement] --> SUC[Success institution] MOV --> CO[Co-option] MOV --> REP[Repression] MOV --> SPL[Split fatigue] SUC --> END[End as street actor]
Conclusion
Movements end through victory, absorption, repression, split, or fatigue. Tilly, Michels, and resource-mobilisation theory map those doors. Indian nationalist, labour, anti-corruption, and women’s campaigns illustrate different endings. Examine the form that dies, not only whether the file closed.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Does a law mean the movement succeeded and ended?
The campaign may end. Implementation struggles can start a new phase.
-
Can a movement end and restart?
Yes. Grievances and networks remain. Demobilisation is often a pause.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Analyse the nature of transition from ideology to identity politics in India. -
2022 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss how "environmentalism" can be explained with new social movements approach. -
2022 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Illustrate with examples the role of pressure groups in the formulation of social policies. -
2021 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Explain how political parties and pressure groups are dialectically related to each other in terms of achieving their goals -
2020 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain democracy as an order of society. What are the factors preventing people's participation in politics? -
2018 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the challenges thrown by religious revivalism to a secular nation-state. -
2018 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Are social movements primordial in means and progressive in agenda? Explain -
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Sociology
Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.
Sociology as Science
Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.
Sociology as Science
Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.