Q2(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · 2 min read

← Q1(e) Q3(a) →

What are the reactions of R.K. Merton to the functionalism of social anthropologists ? Bring out the limitations of latent functions.

Topic: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx. Syllabus: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx — Historical materialism, mode of production, alienation, class struggle; Emile Durkheim — Division of labour, social fact, suicide, religion and society; Max Weber — Social action, ideal types, authority, bureaucracy, protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism; Talcott Parsons — Social system, pattern variables; Robert K. Merton — Latent and manifest functions, conformity and deviance, reference groups; Mead — Self and identity. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx.

Revision summary

Anthropological functionalism treated customs as serving a unified whole. Merton rejected unity, universal function, and indispensability. He offered manifest/latent, dysfunction, and alternatives. Latent functions fail when unfalsifiable, when they hide whose order is served, and when they freeze change. Gendered unpaid labour can be misread as latent family stability. Use as hypothesis, not as a blessing of every custom.

Model answer

Introduction

Social anthropologists such as Bronislaw Malinowski and A. R. Radcliffe-Brown treated items of culture as serving the whole of a small society. Robert K. Merton reacted by cutting that grand functionalism down. He kept function as a tool and named its overclaims, including the limits of latent functions.

Body

Anthropological functionalism as Merton met it

  • Malinowski tied customs to individual needs. Radcliffe-Brown tied them to the persistence of the social structure.
  • Both leaned toward a postulate of universal functionalism: every item serves the system.
  • Small-scale, relatively bounded societies made the whole look obvious.

Merton’s reactions

  • He rejected three postulates: functional unity of the whole, universal functionalism, and functional indispensability.
  • Complex, conflictual societies, which Karl Marx had already stressed, cannot be read as one clan.
  • He introduced manifest and latent functions, dysfunctions, and functional alternatives.
  • Middle-range theory replaced a theory of everything. The Hopi rain dance could bind without making rain.

What he kept

  • The question “what does this practice do?” remains. Veblen’s conspicuous consumption is a latent-status function.

Limitations of latent functions

  • The observer may invent a hidden use. Latent function can become an unfalsifiable story.
  • Unanticipated consequences are not automatically functions. A leak may only harm.
  • Conflict: whose system is served? Caste ritual may integrate the dominant and exclude others.
  • Gender: latent “stability” of the family can be unpaid female labour, which Ann Oakley made visible.
  • Static bias: explaining persistence underplays change and power, which later conflict theory pressed.

Balance

  • Use latent functions as hypotheses about hidden contributions.
  • Demand evidence, name dysfunctions, and specify the unit: group, class, or society.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  ANT[Malinowski Radcliffe-Brown] --> WHOLE[Item serves whole]
  MER[Merton] --> CUT[No unity no indispensability]
  MER --> LAT[Latent function]
  LAT --> LIM[Invented use domination stasis]

Conclusion

Merton reacted to anthropological functionalism by dropping unity, universality, and indispensability, and by splitting manifest from latent. Latent functions are limited when they excuse domination, invent uses, or freeze conflict. Keep the tool; bind it with dysfunction, alternatives, and a named beneficiary.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2020 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    'Ideal Types of Max Weber are mental constructs, they do not correspond to the reality. Give your views.

    View answer →

  2. 2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Analyse the relevance of 'Pattern variables' in the study of social change.

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Capitalism has brought increasing informalisation of work in society.Substantiate your answer.

    View answer →

  4. 2020 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Discuss the consequences of Across Region marriage on kinship system in modern Indian society.

    View answer →

  5. 2020 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    How does Marx view social conflict as an essential element in social change?

    View answer →

  6. 2020 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    What is the impact of gender division of labour on the development of society?

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Present a sociological review on the 'new middle class'

    View answer →

  8. 2019 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What, according to Merton, is the difference between 'unanticipated consequences' and 'latent functions' ? Give examples to elaborate

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.

Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.