Q5(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q5(a) Q5(e) →

What are the problems in observing social facts in Durkheim's views?

Topic: Sociology. Syllabus: Sociology — The Discipline: Modernity and social changes in Europe and emergence of sociology; Scope of the subject and comparison with other social sciences; Sociology and common sense. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Sociology.

Revision summary

Social facts are external and constraining; they are not introspected. Problems: prenotions, observer feeling, and office-made statistics. Durkheim: define externally and compare. Blumer and Weber add meaning and value-relevance. Oakley adds the interview as a social relation. Suicide files illustrate the official-classification problem.

Model answer

Introduction

  • Emile Durkheim asked observers to treat social facts as things: external, constraining, and general. The problems he named, and those his method creates, sit in how we see those facts without turning them into private opinions or into the researcher’s wish.

Body

Problems he himself flagged

  • Social facts are not given to introspection. The observer’s feelings are not the fact.
  • Official statistics, as in Suicide, are already classified by offices. Definition and recording vary.
  • Prenotions—everyday words such as crime or religion—must be discarded for constructed definitions.

Problems his rule creates

  • Treating facts as things can freeze meanings that actors still negotiate, which Herbert Blumer later stressed.
  • The observer is also in society. Value-relevance, as Max Weber argued, selects which fact is seen.
  • Gendered and colonial prenotions hid women’s work and caste as “custom”.

Practical observation problems

  • Access, lying, and the interview as a relation, after Ann Oakley.
  • Rates without ethnography miss how a death became a suicide file.

Durkheim’s remedies

  • Define by external characteristics, compare, and seek concomitant variation.
  • Use law, rates, and institutions as indicators, not as inner states.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  SF[Social facts] --> OBS[Observation]
  PRE[Prenotions feeling] --> PROB[Problems]
  OFF[Official classification] --> PROB
  DEF[External definition comparison] --> REM[Durkheim remedy]

Conclusion

For Durkheim, the problems of observing social facts are prenotions, inner feeling, and impure official files. His remedy is definition, externality, and comparison. Later sociology added standpoint, meaning, and gender as further problems his “thing” rule underplayed.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Does the institution of marriage continue to be sacred in Indian society? Comments.

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2020 · Q5(e)). View answer →

  • Did Durkheim trust the census blindly?

    He used official rates as constructed indicators, and he knew classification was a difficulty.

  • Is a custom a social fact?

    If it is general and constraining, yes. The problem is to observe it without the observer’s moral taste.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2020 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.

    View answer →

  2. 2020 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    According to Durkheim, "The major function of education is the transmission of society's norms and values." Discuss.

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q5(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    In the context of globalisation, has the scope of sociology been changing India ? Comment.

    View answer →

  4. 2020 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Does the institution of marriage continue to be sacred in Indian society? Comments.

    View answer →

  5. 2020 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    According to Mills, "Elites rule in institutional terms rather than psychological terms." Comment.

    View answer →

  6. 2020 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Critically assess the Marxian theory of 'Alienation'."

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline

    View answer →

  8. 2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'?

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations

Sociology

Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.

Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015

Sociology

Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.

Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer

Sociology

Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.