Revision summary
Technology can raise yields, health, and administrative capacity. The same tools can deepen dependency through patents, platforms, and data rents. Frank, Wallerstein, and Cardoso map dependent development. Gig modernisation can be informalisation. Gendered care is not automatically solved by apps. Both processes accelerate; ownership decides the mix.
Model answer
Introduction
Technology raises productivity and connects markets. That can look like development. The same tools can deepen dependency when patents, platforms, and standards sit in a core. A. G. Frank and Immanuel Wallerstein named the second process. Both can run together.
Body
Acceleration of development
- W. W. Rostow treated technique as a take-off lever. Green Revolution yields and digital public goods in India show real gains in output and delivery.
- Max Weber’s rationalisation: calculation, records, and machines thicken modern organisation.
- Public health techniques cut some deaths. That is development as capability, after Amartya Sen.
Acceleration of dependency
- Frank’s development of underdevelopment: technology arrives as a package with surplus drain.
- Patents, software stacks, and platform rents keep the periphery as a user. Cardoso’s dependent development still fits some manufacturing.
- Labour platforms informalise work while looking modern, a capitalist shell Jan Breman would recognise.
- Data colonialism: Indian users feed models owned elsewhere.
How they couple
- A UPI rail can be developmental and still sit on hardware and chip dependencies.
- Skill polarisation: a few engineers, many gig riders. Class, not only nation, is the unit.
- Gender: care apps do not automatically end unpaid labour, as Ann Oakley would note.
Discuss
- Technology is not a neutral accelerator. It accelerates the path already structured by class and world-system.
- Delinking every chip is fantasy. Bargaining over standards and public tech is the political middle.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD TECH[Technology] --> DEV[Productivity health delivery] TECH --> DEP[Patents platforms drain] WS[World-system class] --> PATH[Which arrow wins] TECH --> PATH
Conclusion
Technology has accelerated development as productivity, health, and state capacity. It has also accelerated dependency as patents, platforms, and informalised modern work. Frank and Wallerstein remain relevant; Rostow’s one-way machine does not. Discuss both arrows, and name who owns the tool.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Phenomenological perspectives in sociology reject many of the assumptions of positivism. Comment.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is every imported machine dependency?
Import can be a tactic. Dependency is a structure of who sets standards and captures rent.
-
Did Green Revolution only develop?
It raised grain. It also stratified water, credit, and regional dependence on inputs.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment. -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change. -
2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment. -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate. -
2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario. -
2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. -
2020 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation. -
2019 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is civil society ? Present a note on civil society engagement with science and technology policy in India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Sociology
Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.
Sociology as Science
Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.
Sociology as Science
Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.