Q6(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q6 Q7 →

Analyse the strengths and weaknesses of social survey method in social research.

Topic: Sociology as Science. Syllabus: Sociology as Science: Science, scientific method and critique; Major theoretical strands of research methodology; Positivism and its critique; Fact value and objectivity; Non-positivist methodologies. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Sociology as Science.

Revision summary

Surveys estimate population rates with known error. NFHS and NSSO illustrate Indian strengths. Weaknesses: thin meaning, missing frames, social desirability, weak process. Blumer, Weber, and Oakley name those limits. Use for prevalence; pair with fieldwork for why.

Model answer

Introduction

The social survey asks standardised questions of a sample to describe a population. NFHS and NSSO are Indian strengths of the method. Weakness begins when meaning, power, and absence from the frame are forced into a tick.

Body

Strengths

  • Probability surveys estimate rates with known error, which ethnography cannot.
  • Comparison over time and regions: fertility, work, and education become public facts, as Emile Durkheim needed rates.
  • Policy can be checked. Anonymised large N reduces some interviewer whims.
  • Mixed with a census frame, it can represent hidden rural interiors better than a city anecdote.

Weaknesses

  • Max Weber’s meaning thins in a closed option. Herbert Blumer warned of frozen variables.
  • Frames miss pavement dwellers and some migrants. Informal labour is undercounted.
  • Ann Oakley: the interview is a relation; a schedule can still extract.
  • Social desirability on caste, violence, and income. Translation fails across languages.
  • Causation is weaker than a well-chosen comparison of processes.

Analysis

  • Use surveys for prevalence and gradients.
  • Do not use them as the whole of verstehen or of class struggle.
  • Strength is at its peak when the question matches a well-defined indicator.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  SUR[Social survey] --> STR[Rates comparison error]
  SUR --> WEAK[Meaning frame gaps]
  NFHS[NFHS NSSO] --> STR
  ETH[Ethnography] --> MEAN[Meaning process]

Conclusion

Social surveys are strong for population rates, comparison, and democratic publicity of facts. They are weak for meaning, unlisted lives, and causal process. Durkheim needs them; Geertz cannot live on them. Analyse by matching tool to claim, as NFHS versus a village ethnography shows.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2022 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    How does a researcher achieve objectivity in interpretative research?

    View answer →

  2. 2020 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.

    View answer →

  4. 2020 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Phenomenological perspectives in sociology reject many of the assumptions of positivism. Comment.

    View answer →

  5. 2018 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Is non-positivist methodology scientific? Illustrate.

    View answer →

  6. 2018 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Does scientific method make Sociology a Science? Illustrate your answer with Durkheim's method.

    View answer →

  7. 2017 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Examine ethnomethodological and phenomenological perspective as critique of positivism

    View answer →

  8. 2017 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Illustrate with example the significance of variable in sociology research

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.

Sociology

Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.

Sociology as Science

Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.

Sociology as Science

Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.