Revision summary
Phenomenology studies the lifeworld given to actors (Schutz). It rejects positivism’s nowhere observer, thing-like facts, and covering-law monopoly. Garfinkel: members produce the fact. Weber is a neighbour on meaning. Comment: reject objectivist assumptions; keep evidence and typicality. Do not throw away rates; ask how they were made.
Model answer
Introduction
Phenomenological sociology, after Alfred Schutz and later Berger and Luckmann, studies the lifeworld as it is given to actors. Positivism, in the Comte–Durkheim textbook sense, seeks external laws and thing-like facts. The first does reject many of the second’s assumptions. It does not reject all discipline.
Body
Positivist assumptions under fire
- Society as a thing observed from nowhere. Schutz: the observer is already a member with a stock of knowledge.
- Law-like covering statements as the only science. Phenomenology wants typical structures of meaning.
- Separation of fact and everyday language. Harold Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology radicalised this: members’ methods produce the fact.
What is rejected
- Naive behaviourism and a questionnaire that skips the definition of the situation, which Herbert Blumer also attacked.
- Emile Durkheim’s “treat as things” if it erases intended meaning. Max Weber is a neighbour, not an enemy.
What is not a total war
- Phenomenology still wants typicality and evidence. It is not a diary cult.
- Large rates can still be used if one asks how they were produced in offices.
Comment
- The rejection is real on objectivism, covering-law pride, and the innocent fact.
- A useful sociology keeps Schutz for meaning and Durkheim for constraint, rather than a sectarian purge.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD POS[Positivism] --> THING[Facts as things laws] PHE[Phenomenology] --> LIFE[Lifeworld meaning] PHE --> REJ[Reject nowhere observer] LIFE --> TYP[Typical structures]
Conclusion
Phenomenological perspectives reject positivism’s view-from-nowhere, thing-like facts, and covering-law monopoly. Schutz, Berger and Luckmann, and Garfinkel lead that rejection. Comment: they do not reject public evidence. Pair lifeworld with structure so the comment does not become anti-science.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically assess the Marxian theory of 'Alienation'."
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Is phenomenology anti-Durkheim?
It rejects treating meaning as nothing. It can still study constraint as experienced.
-
Does construction mean anything goes?
No. Construction is a social process with typical forms, not a private whim.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How does a researcher achieve objectivity in interpretative research? -
2020 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss. -
2020 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment. -
2020 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Analyse the strengths and weaknesses of social survey method in social research. -
2018 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Is non-positivist methodology scientific? Illustrate. -
2018 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Does scientific method make Sociology a Science? Illustrate your answer with Durkheim's method. -
2017 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine ethnomethodological and phenomenological perspective as critique of positivism -
2017 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Illustrate with example the significance of variable in sociology research
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Sociology
Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.
Sociology as Science
Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.
Sociology as Science
Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.