Revision summary
COVID-19 showed bodily dependence on nature and on laboratory technique. Exposure was socially structured: crowding, care work, migrant walks. Beck’s risk society and Latour’s hybrids fit better than raw surrender. Science healed and also excluded and surveilled. Vaccine nationalism showed hierarchy in science itself. Comment: dependent, not equally at mercy.
Model answer
Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic showed humans as bodies in a viral ecology, as patients of laboratories, and as subjects of apps, lockdowns, and vaccines. Mercy here means dependence without control. Humanity was not helpless in every sense. It was exposed.
Body
Nature
- A zoonotic virus reminded us that society sits in nature, which Karl Marx already treated as metabolism with the earth.
- Density, wet markets, and global travel are social natures, not a revenge of a pure wilderness.
- Ulrich Beck’s risk society: manufactured uncertainties return as side-effects of our own organisation.
Science and technology
- Virology, oxygen plants, and mRNA platforms were conditions of survival, not optional culture.
- Bruno Latour’s hybrids: the virus-in-the-PCR-machine is neither raw nature nor pure society.
- Technology also harmed: misinformation, exclusion from telemedicine, and surveillance apps.
Mercy or relation?
- Emile Durkheim’s social facts include mortality rates that no one person authors, as the pandemic curve showed.
- Max Weber’s rationalisation met a limit: calculation lagged the pathogen.
- Informal labour and migrant walks in India showed that “humanity” was stratified. Ann Oakley’s care work and caste crowding were the real mercy map.
Comment
- At the mercy of nature: yes as bodies; no as if culture did not shape exposure.
- At the mercy of science and technology: dependent on them, and also governed by those who own labs and platforms.
- The pandemic was a teacher of interdependence, not of simple surrender.
After the peak
- Vaccine nationalism and patent fights showed science as a world-system good, after Immanuel Wallerstein’s sense of hierarchy.
- Memory of lockdown is now a social fact for a cohort.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD NAT[Viral nature] --> EXP[Exposure] SCI[Science technology] --> EXP SCI --> HEAL[Vaccine oxygen] SOC[Class caste gender] --> EXP EXP --> COV[COVID-19 situation]
Conclusion
In the pandemic, humanity was at the mercy of a natural pathogen and of the sciences and techniques that named, tracked, and sometimes healed it. Comment: dependence is real; equal mercy is false. Marx’s metabolism, Beck’s risk, and Indian migrant labour show a structured exposure, not a single human fate.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
According to Durkheim, "The major function of education is the transmission of society's norms and values." Discuss.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Did science save us, or did it fail?
It produced vaccines and oxygen knowledge. It did not equally deliver them. Both are true.
-
Is the next pandemic destiny?
Ecology and travel make risk likely. Public health capacity decides how much mercy we beg.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The difference between information and data in social science is subtle. Comment. -
2022 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Trace the trajectory of development perspectives on social change. -
2022 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Sociologists argue for democratization of science and technology for inclusive development. Comment. -
2022 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Are traditional social institutions getting weakend as agents of social change in the contemporary society ? Substantiate. -
2021 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Critically examine the contribution of dependency theories in understanding the present global scenario. -
2021 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the role of Science and Technology in enabling us to face the challenges triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. -
2020 · Q7(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Technology has accelerated the process of development and dependency. Discuss. -
2019 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is civil society ? Present a note on civil society engagement with science and technology policy in India
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Sociology
Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.
Sociology as Science
Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.
Sociology as Science
Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.