Revision summary
Across-region marriage links distant kinship belts through migration and bureaus. Alliance stretches; cousin-exchange and local mama networks weaken. Caste matching and natal isolation can persist or worsen. Feminist cases of abandonment mark the dark edge. Kinship is re-spatialised, not abolished. NFHS still shows the wider patriarchal context.
Model answer
Introduction
Across-region marriage links spouses from distant language and kinship belts, often through bureaus or labour migration. It pulls against Irawati Karve’s north–south types and against village endogamy of caste. Consequences for kinship are real and uneven.
Body
What changes
- Affinal networks stretch across states. The local circle of mama and cousin-exchange, in the Dravidian type, cannot repeat as before.
- Language and food in the household become negotiated. Children may grow bilingual kin terms.
- Patrilocal absorption of the bride can intensify isolation when natal kin are a train away.
What persists
- Caste matching often still operates at a distance. The marriage is regional, not always inter-caste.
- Honour, dowry bargains, and son preference, which NFHS still records, travel with the bride.
- Karve’s north Indian pattern of natal distance can worsen, not vanish.
Consequences
- New support gaps: less everyday help from sisters and mothers. More phone kinship.
- Risk of abandonment and trafficking stories in some north-Indian bride-import cases, which feminist work documented.
- Slow cosmopolitisation of the urban middle class, after the new-middle-class consumption map.
- Legal parentage and live-in case law sit in the same modern field of the household.
Discuss
- Kinship is not ended. It is re-spatialised.
- The system becomes more conjugal and more brittle for the in-married woman.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ARM[Across-region marriage] --> STRETCH[Long-distance affines] STRETCH --> THIN[Thin natal support] CAST[Caste honour] --> ARM THIN --> ISO[Bride isolation risk]
Conclusion
Across-region marriage stretches alliance, thins everyday natal support, and can isolate brides even while it looks modern. Caste and patriarchy often persist at a distance. Karve’s regional systems mix rather than melt. Consequence: a more conjugal, more fragile kinship for many women, with phone ties substituting for the courtyard.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is humanity at the mercy of Nature, Science and Technology ? Comment in the light of pandemic situation.
Next question in the 2020 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Is this the same as inter-caste marriage?
No. Many across-region unions remain caste-endogamous at a distance.
-
Do phones solve kinship?
They help talk. They do not replace a sister in childbirth or a panchayat in a dispute.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
'Ideal Types of Max Weber are mental constructs, they do not correspond to the reality. Give your views. -
2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyse the relevance of 'Pattern variables' in the study of social change. -
2020 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What are the reactions of R.K. Merton to the functionalism of social anthropologists ? Bring out the limitations of latent functions. -
2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Capitalism has brought increasing informalisation of work in society.Substantiate your answer. -
2020 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How does Marx view social conflict as an essential element in social change? -
2020 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What is the impact of gender division of labour on the development of society? -
2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Present a sociological review on the 'new middle class' -
2019 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What, according to Merton, is the difference between 'unanticipated consequences' and 'latent functions' ? Give examples to elaborate
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How did the intellectual forces lead to the emergence of sociology ?Discuss.
Sociology
Intellectual forces made society worldly, comparable, and criticisable. Montesquieu, Smith, Rousseau, and Comte prepared comparison, market, inequality, and a named science. Marx, Durkheim, and Weber filled the space with class, social facts, and action. Nisbet’s conservative problems also fed the tradition. Ideas licensed the discipline; industry made it urgent.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is sociology a value-free science ? Discuss.
Sociology as Science
Weber: value-relevance in questions; value-discipline in proof. Marx, Gouldner, and Harding reject a personless science. Oakley: the interview is already a moral relation. Census categories carry values into counts. Verdict: not value-free; yes to disciplined demonstration.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Methodology is a system of rules, principles and procedures, which forms. scientific investigation. Comment.
Sociology as Science
Methodology is a system of principles, rules, and procedures. It forms scientific investigation by making claims checkable. Durkheim and Weber wrote method as discipline. Blumer and feminist standpoint show theory inside procedure. Census and NFHS are procedures, not theory-free machines.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.