Q8(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2020 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · 2 min read

← Q3(c) Q8(b) →

How does Marx view social conflict as an essential element in social change?

Topic: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx. Syllabus: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx — Historical materialism, mode of production, alienation, class struggle; Emile Durkheim — Division of labour, social fact, suicide, religion and society; Max Weber — Social action, ideal types, authority, bureaucracy, protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism; Talcott Parsons — Social system, pattern variables; Robert K. Merton — Latent and manifest functions, conformity and deviance, reference groups; Mead — Self and identity. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx.

Revision summary

Marx: class struggle is the essential motor of historical change. Forces versus relations of production create structural conflict. The state is a stake, not a referee. Everyday exploitation is conflict; revolution is its decisive form. Weber, gender, and caste add other essential conflicts. Without struggle, the mode reproduces with crises.

Model answer

Introduction

For Karl Marx, history moves through contradiction in the mode of production. Social conflict, above all class struggle, is not a breakdown of order. It is the essential motor that transforms one set of relations into another. Peaceful growth without that conflict is, in his view, a surface.

Body

Conflict as the motor

  • The Communist Manifesto: the history of hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.
  • Forces of production develop inside relations of production until they fetter. Conflict then becomes revolutionary.
  • The state is a stake in that conflict, not a neutral umpire.

Essential, not accidental

  • Unlike Emile Durkheim’s pathology of conflict, Marx treats antagonism as structural.
  • Unlike a simple riot, class conflict can be more or less conscious. Ideology delays, it does not cancel, the essential role.
  • Alienation and exploitation are the everyday form; open struggle is the political form.

How change happens

  • Quantitative fights over the working day prepare qualitative change of the mode.
  • A new class becomes universal in its claim, then founds a new order.
  • Colonial and peasant wars were later fitted, unevenly, into this engine.

Limits to mark while answering “how”

  • Max Weber’s status and party conflicts also change societies without a two-class script.
  • Gender and caste struggles are essential in India and were under-theorised in the classic texts.
  • Ralf Dahrendorf and later conflict theory kept conflict as motor while dropping the guaranteed socialist end.

View in one line

  • No class conflict, no transformation of the mode; only reproduction with crises.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  MOP[Mode of production] --> CON[Contradiction]
  CON --> CS[Class struggle]
  CS --> CH[Social change]
  IDE[Ideology] --> DELAY[Delayed consciousness]

Conclusion

Marx views social conflict as essential because contradiction in production must be fought out as class struggle to change the historical form of society. Exploitation is the standing conflict; revolution is its decisive pitch. Use the view as a theory of structural change, and add Weber, gender, and caste so “essential” does not mean “only”.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2020 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    'Ideal Types of Max Weber are mental constructs, they do not correspond to the reality. Give your views.

    View answer →

  2. 2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Analyse the relevance of 'Pattern variables' in the study of social change.

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    What are the reactions of R.K. Merton to the functionalism of social anthropologists ? Bring out the limitations of latent functions.

    View answer →

  4. 2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Capitalism has brought increasing informalisation of work in society.Substantiate your answer.

    View answer →

  5. 2020 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Discuss the consequences of Across Region marriage on kinship system in modern Indian society.

    View answer →

  6. 2020 · Q8(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    What is the impact of gender division of labour on the development of society?

    View answer →

  7. 2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Present a sociological review on the 'new middle class'

    View answer →

  8. 2019 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What, according to Merton, is the difference between 'unanticipated consequences' and 'latent functions' ? Give examples to elaborate

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.

Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.