Revision summary
Across-region marriage links distant kinship belts through migration and bureaus. Alliance stretches; cousin-exchange and local mama networks weaken. Caste matching and natal isolation can persist or worsen. Feminist cases of abandonment mark the dark edge. Kinship is re-spatialised, not abolished. NFHS still shows the wider patriarchal context.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
Across-region marriage links spouses from distant language and kinship belts, often through bureaus or labour migration. It pulls against Irawati Karve’s north–south types and against village endogamy of caste. Consequences for kinship are real and uneven.
Body
What changes
- Affinal networks stretch across states. The local circle of mama and cousin-exchange, in the Dravidian type, cannot repeat as before.
- Language and food in the household become negotiated. Children may grow bilingual kin terms.
- Patrilocal absorption of the bride can intensify isolation when natal kin are a train away.
What persists
- Caste matching often still operates at a distance. The marriage is regional, not always inter-caste.
- Honour, dowry bargains, and son preference, which NFHS still records, travel with the bride.
- Karve’s north Indian pattern of natal distance can worsen, not vanish.
Consequences
- New support gaps: less everyday help from sisters and mothers. More phone kinship.
- Risk of abandonment and trafficking stories in some north-Indian bride-import cases, which feminist work documented.
- Slow cosmopolitisation of the urban middle class, after the new-middle-class consumption map.
- Legal parentage and live-in case law sit in the same modern field of the household.
Discuss
- Kinship is not ended. It is re-spatialised.
- The system becomes more conjugal and more brittle for the in-married woman.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ARM[Across-region marriage] --> STRETCH[Long-distance affines] STRETCH --> THIN[Thin natal support] CAST[Caste honour] --> ARM THIN --> ISO[Bride isolation risk]
Conclusion
Across-region marriage stretches alliance, thins everyday natal support, and can isolate brides even while it looks modern. Caste and patriarchy often persist at a distance. Karve’s regional systems mix rather than melt. Consequence: a more conjugal, more fragile kinship for many women, with phone ties substituting for the courtyard.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How does Marx view social conflict as an essential element in social change?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2020 · Q8(a)). View answer →
-
Is this the same as inter-caste marriage?
No. Many across-region unions remain caste-endogamous at a distance.
-
Do phones solve kinship?
They help talk. They do not replace a sister in childbirth or a panchayat in a dispute.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2019 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What, according to Merton, is the difference between 'unanticipated consequences' and 'latent functions' ? Give examples to elaborate
More from this topic
Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · Solution
Compare the social organisation of work in industrial capitalism and platform capitalism
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
• **Setting:** Industrial capitalism centres work in physical factories; platform capitalism disperses it via digital apps. • **Control:** Factories use direct managerial supervision and time-discipline; platforms use invisible algorithms and automated ratings. • **Contracts:** Industrial work relies on standard, secure employment with welfare benefits; platform work relies on gig contracts and independent contractors. • **Risk:** Factories shoulder capital costs; platform capitalism shifts risks and equipment costs onto individual workers. • **Solidarity:** Shared factory spaces foster collective class consciousness; digital isolation creates an atomised "precariat." • **Surplus Value:** Both systems extract surplus value, but platforms obscure exploitation behind the illusion of entrepreneurial freedom.
Q5(d) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · Solution
How does Max Weber's 'theory of authority' shape bureaucracy? Analyse.
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Max Weber's sociological framework links different forms of legitimate domination directly to the rise of modern rational-legal bureaucracy. Traditional and charismatic authority provide historical context, but rational-legal authority creates the impersonal rules, hierarchy, and technical expertise defining bureaucratic structures. While ensuring efficiency, this iron cage of rationalisation also poses risks of alienation and goal displacement, which later thinkers critiqued.
Q3(c) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks · Solution
How does Emile Durkheim conceptualize religion as a 'social fact'? Explain
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Emile Durkheim treats religion as a quintessential social fact in 'The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life' (1912). Moving away from supernatural or animistic definitions, he argues that religion is fundamentally a collective product. Society objectifies its own moral authority and solidarity through sacred symbols and rituals. By separating the sacred from the profane, religious practices reinforce social integration and collective consciousness. Thus, religion is society worshipping itself, operating as an external and coercive constraint upon individual thought and action.