Revision summary
Gendered work splits unpaid care from paid public labour. It subsidises capitalist growth and human development of children. It also blocks women’s capabilities, skills, and voice. Oakley, Walby, Hartmann, and Sen frame the impact. NFHS and PLFS are the Indian files. Development that ignores time-use is a male public account.
Model answer
Introduction
The gender division of labour assigns men and women different work, especially unpaid care versus paid public work. Development as growth and capability is shaped by that split. A GDP story that ignores it misreads both progress and stagnation.
Body
The division
- Ann Oakley made housework visible as labour. Sylvia Walby placed the household as a patriarchal structure.
- PLFS low female labour-force rates often hide home-based and care work.
- R. W. Connell’s gender order organises masculinities around the breadwinner ideal.
Impacts on development
- Unpaid care subsidises the wage, which Marxist feminists after Heidi Hartmann named. Capitalist development rides that subsidy.
- Human development: children’s nutrition and schooling depend on that labour, as NFHS health files imply.
- Growth can rise while women’s time poverty deepens. Amartya Sen’s capabilities then diverge by sex.
- Informalisation often feminises the cheap shell of the economy.
Impacts that block development
- Exclusion from skills and assets slows the talent pool, against even Davis–Moore sorting.
- Violence and restricted mobility, in NFHS, cut public participation and entrepreneurship.
- Development policy that only adds microcredit without cutting care loads reproduces the split.
Reciprocal note
- Some development, such as public childcare, can re-divide labour. That is rare and fought for.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD GDL[Gender division of labour] --> CARE[Unpaid care subsidy] GDL --> CHEAP[Feminised informal wage] CARE --> DEV[Development as growth] GDL --> BLOCK[Lost capabilities] BLOCK --> UNEVEN[Uneven development]
Conclusion
The gender division of labour underwrites development by supplying unpaid care and cheap feminised work, and it blocks development by wasting capabilities and voice. Oakley, Walby, Hartmann, and Sen are the measures. Count GDP, then count time.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Present a sociological review on the 'new middle class'
Next question on this syllabus topic (2019 · Q1(d)). View answer →
-
Does more female employment end the division?
Not if the double day remains. Public care and male unpaid work must shift too.
-
Is this only a household issue?
The household is a development institution. Factories and the state already use its output.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
'Ideal Types of Max Weber are mental constructs, they do not correspond to the reality. Give your views. -
2020 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Analyse the relevance of 'Pattern variables' in the study of social change. -
2020 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What are the reactions of R.K. Merton to the functionalism of social anthropologists ? Bring out the limitations of latent functions. -
2020 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Capitalism has brought increasing informalisation of work in society.Substantiate your answer. -
2020 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the consequences of Across Region marriage on kinship system in modern Indian society. -
2020 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How does Marx view social conflict as an essential element in social change? -
2019 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Present a sociological review on the 'new middle class' -
2019 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What, according to Merton, is the difference between 'unanticipated consequences' and 'latent functions' ? Give examples to elaborate
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.