Revision summary
Terrorism offsets military inequality with civilian spectacle and hiding. It targets the state’s monopoly of force and a watching public. Newness: networks, media, transnational reach. War-on-terror challenges: no capital, recruitment via repression, emergency law. The metaphor of winning a war fits states better than cells.
Model answer
Introduction
Asymmetrical warfare is conflict between unequal military capacities. Terrorism uses spectacular violence against civilians and symbols to offset that inequality. It is “new” in global media reach and networked cells, not in the fact of irregular fear.
Body
Asymmetry
- Regular armies hold territory and uniforms. Terrorist groups hold timing, hiding, and the news image.
- Max Weber’s state monopoly of legitimate force is the target. The attack seeks a political audience, as Charles Tilly’s violence-as-politics reminds us.
- Newness: transnational finance, encrypted media, and cities as stages, after 9/11 as a world event.
Challenges of a “war on terrorism”
- The enemy is a network, not a capital to occupy. Michels-style organisation can be cellular.
- Winning hearts sits against profiling that produces labelling and new recruits, a Mertonian unanticipated consequence.
- Democracies risk emergency laws that thin civil society, which Gramsci would read as coercive substitution for hegemony.
- Distinguishing insurgency, communal riot, and terrorism is a political act, not a clean file.
Limit of the war metaphor
- Wars end with surrender. Terror campaigns can pause, split, and rename.
- Development, honour, and foreign policy sit outside a purely military win.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD ST[State army] --> ASYM[Asymmetry] TER[Terror network] --> ASYM MED[Media spectacle] --> TER WAR[War metaphor] --> CH[No capital to take]
Conclusion
Terrorism is asymmetrical because the weak use civilian spectacle against the strong state’s monopoly of force. Media and networks make the form newly global. Winning a war on terrorism is challenged by cells without capitals, by recruitment through repression, and by the mismatch of war language with a political-network problem.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2018 · Q1(a)). View answer →
-
Is all irregular war terrorism?
No. Guerrilla war may target armies. Terrorism’s mark is the civilian-symbolic strike for an audience.
-
Can development end it?
Grievance matters. Organisation and ideology also matter. Neither bombs nor jobs alone close the file.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the historical antecedents of the emergence of Sociology as a discipline -
2019 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is the Marxist concept of 'fetishism of commodities'? -
2019 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the probability sampling strategies with examples -
2019 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Mead, "We play a key role in our own socialization." -
2019 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Bring out the significance of Ethnography in social research -
2019 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
What is 'reserve army of labour' ? Present the position of feminist scholars on this -
2019 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the importance of interpretative understanding of social phenomena and explain its limitations -
2019 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Are all world religions patriarchal ? Substantiate your answer with examples
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
In what way does queer kinship challenge the traditional kinship system? Substantiate by giving illustrations
Sociology
Traditional kinship canonically runs on descent, marriage alliance and binary gendered terms. Queer kinship organises care, parenthood and belonging beyond that monopoly. Weston’s chosen families and Schneider’s critique of blood as symbol are theoretical anchors. Indian hijra gharanas illustrate initiation-based relatedness outside the patriline. Law often still privileges conjugal heterosexual kinship, which is part of the challenge. The point is that kinship is done through practice, not only inherited as blood.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by sustainable development? Discuss the elements of sustainable development as proposed in the UNDP's Sustainable Development Goals Report-2015
Sociology
Brundtland defined sustainable development as meeting present needs without compromising the future. The 2015 SDG agenda, reflected in UNDP reporting, treats that as a multi-goal programme. Five elements—people, planet, prosperity, peace, partnership—organise the set. Seventeen goals join poverty and inequality to climate, cities, work and institutions. Sociology stresses unequal needs, risk distribution and weak institutions. The agenda is a frame for development, not an automatic achievement.
Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is science? Do you think that the methods used in natural sciences can be applied to sociology? Give reasons for your answer
Sociology
Science means systematic, public, criticisable knowledge, not only lab hardware. Positivists apply observation, measurement and comparison to social regularities. Limits include meaning, ethics of experiment, values and the double hermeneutic. Kuhn and feminists complicate even the natural-science side of the contrast. The judged answer is qualified yes: use the tools, drop the closed-system fantasy. Sociology remains a science of an open, interpreted world.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.