Revision summary
Revivalism politicises faith and crowd. It challenges secular law, public space, education, and the monopoly of force. Bellah’s civil religion can turn exclusive. Indian principled distance is strained by majoritarian and street politics. The live defence is equal citizenship, not forced unbelief.
Model answer
Introduction
A secular nation-state claims citizenship above a single church. Religious revivalism re-sacralises public life and often a people. The challenge is to law, monopoly of force, and equal membership.
Body
What revivalism does
- It intensifies practice, organisation, and political claim, not only private piety.
- Max Weber’s prophets and Max Weber’s later charisma help; so does Durkheim’s sacred crowd, now on television.
Challenges to the secular state
- Personal law and uniform codes: which community’s family is the nation.
- Public space: procession, conversion politics, and blasphemy as tests of equal protection.
- Education and history: textbooks as sacred memory.
- Violence and vigilantism rival the state’s monopoly of force.
- Majoritarian revival can turn the nation itself into a church, which Robert Bellah’s civil religion warned can be inclusive or exclusive.
Indian present
- Constitutional secularism as principled distance, after Rajeev Bhargava, is strained by street veto and party- mobilised faith.
- Minority security and majority hurt become competing languages.
What the state can still do
- Equal civil rights, prosecution of violence, and refusal to baptise one faith as the nation.
- It cannot pretend Weberian disenchantment is complete.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD REV[Religious revivalism] --> LAW[Personal law street school] REV --> NAT[Nation as church] SEC[Secular state] --> EQ[Equal citizenship] NAT --> CHAL[Challenge] LAW --> CHAL
Conclusion
Religious revivalism challenges the secular nation-state by recoding law, street, school, and belonging. The state is tested on equal citizenship, not on emptying belief. Civil religion can support the republic or swallow it.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is the theory of cultural lag valid in present times? Discuss
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is all public religion revivalism?
No. Everyday practice can coexist with secular law. Revivalism is organised intensification with a political claim.
-
Does secularism require banning faith?
It requires that the state not become one community’s church.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain democracy as an order of society. What are the factors preventing people's participation in politics? -
2020 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine how social movements come to an end. Illustrate with examples. -
2018 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Are social movements primordial in means and progressive in agenda? Explain -
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India -
2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the dynamics of pressure group in multi-party political system -
2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the importance of 'power elite' in democracy. -
2016 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the role of protest movements in changing the status of Dalits in India. -
2016 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
To what extent revolution replaces the existing order of society? Discuss.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense?
Sociology
Sociology focuses on interaction as action oriented to others. Weber, Mead, and Goffman named that object. Common sense is Schutz’s unexamined stock of typifications. Durkheim’s rates and caste studies show why everyday talk is not enough. Sociology uses common-sense language and then tests it.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Weber split value-relevance of the problem from value-discipline in proof. The question of modern capitalism is culturally selected. The claimed fact is elective affinity with inner-worldly asceticism. Ideal types organise the comparison. The book does not preach Calvinism as a duty.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work
Sociology
Yes: I and Me are central in Mead. Me is the organised attitudes of others, the self as object. I is the unpredictable response that allows novelty. Play, game, and generalised other form the Me. Blumer’s interactionism inherits the pair.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.