Q7(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q6(c) Q5(b) →

To what extent revolution replaces the existing order of society? Discuss.

Topic: Politics and Society. Syllabus: Politics and Society: Sociological theories of power; Power elite, bureaucracy, pressure groups, and political parties; Nation, state, citizenship, democracy, civil society, ideology; Protest, agitation, social movements, collective action, revolution. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Politics and Society.

Revision summary

Revolution can replace political order and, in Marx’s aim, the mode of production. Charisma routinises into new staff (Weber); bureaucracy and oligarchy return (Michels). Durkheim, Mead, and gender analysis show slow everyday remainder. India 1947 replaced the colonial state more than caste society. Extent: high for sovereignty, uneven for class, low for honour in the short run.

Model answer

Introduction

Revolution is a rapid, extra-ordinary break in political sovereignty and, in the Marxist sense, in the mode of production. It can replace a ruling staff and a legal order. The extent to which it replaces the whole existing society is historically limited.

Body

High extent: what can be replaced

  • Karl Marx: a social revolution transforms relations of production, not only the palace. 1789 and 1917 aimed at that extent, with different outcomes.
  • Max Weber: charisma and then a new legal-rational or traditional staff can replace legitimate domination.
  • The French Revolutionary calendar of rights and the Soviet property law show deep legal replacement.

Limited extent: what persists

  • Emile Durkheim: moral density and habits do not change on a decree day. Anomie can follow the break.
  • George Herbert Mead’s self and everyday generalised others change slowly.
  • Family, gender, and unpaid care, as later feminists showed after Oakley, often survive as patriarchal order inside a new state.
  • Bureaucracy, in Weber’s and Robert Michels’s keys, reconstitutes minority rule.
  • Robert K. Merton: manifest new man, latent old networks.

Indian discussion

  • National movement and 1947 replaced colonial sovereignty more than village hierarchy. Caste and property showed high persistence.
  • Naxal and other revolutionary projects faced the same extent problem: state smash versus social structure.

Discussion of extent

  • Political order: often high replacement of personnel and constitution.
  • Class structure: possible but reversible or incomplete.
  • Status honour and kinship: lowest extent of replacement in the short run.
  • Talcott Parsons would call a full replace a new system; most revolutions are hybrid.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  REV[Revolution] --> POL[New sovereignty staff]
  REV --> MOP[Possible new production]
  PER[Kin gender honour habit] --> LIM[Limited replacement]

Conclusion

Revolution can replace sovereignty, law, and a ruling class to a large extent. It replaces everyday honour, gender, and moral habits to a much smaller extent unless a long process follows. Marx names the ambition; Durkheim, Weber, and Mead name the remainder.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • "Ideology is crucial for social transformation in a democracy." Discuss.

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q5(b)). View answer →

  • Is reform the opposite of revolution?

    Reform changes within an order. Revolution claims to found a new order. Empirically they mix.

  • Did any revolution replace everything?

    None replaced all of kinship, language, and habit on day one. Claims of total replace are ideological.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India

    View answer →

  2. 2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Examine the dynamics of pressure group in multi-party political system

    View answer →

  3. 2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the importance of 'power elite' in democracy.

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Examine the role of protest movements in changing the status of Dalits in India.

    View answer →

  5. 2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    "Ideology is crucial for social transformation in a democracy." Discuss.

    View answer →

  6. 2015 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Explain the conditions under which a collective action transforms into a social movement.

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Caste ideology appears to have strengthened democracy .Comment.

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    "Globalization involves deterritorialization ." Examine with reference to the nation-state."

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

How can you assess the significance of social movements in the digital era? Explain

Politics and Society

Social movements now use platforms for recruitment, framing and witnessing. Connective action personalises protest and lowers coordination costs. Significance is high for speed, scale and agenda setting. Limits include digital divide, surveillance, rumour and weak staying power. Older resource and opportunity theories still explain durable success. Indian protests and relief campaigns show amplification, not replacement, of the street.

Q4(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What would you identify as the similarities and differences in the elite theories of Mosca, Michels and Pareto? Discuss their main/crucial issues

Politics and Society

Mosca: an organised ruling class justified by a political formula. Michels: organisation produces oligarchy even in egalitarian parties. Pareto: elites circulate; lions and foxes name styles of rule. Similarities: minority power, scepticism toward literal popular rule and toward Marxian class monopoly of explanation. Differences: political formula versus party oligarchy versus psychological residues. Crucial issues: accountability, recruitment and whether democracy can discipline elites.

Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

Are pressure groups a threat to or a necessary element of democracy? Explain with suitable illustrations

Politics and Society

Pressure groups influence policy without ordinarily taking office. Pluralists treat them as necessary vehicles of interest articulation. Critics note unequal organising power, capture and majoritarian or caste intimidation. Olson explains why concentrated interests beat diffuse majorities. Indian farmers’ protests, chambers of commerce and caste associations show both voices and capture. The answer is conditional: necessary, and dangerous without equality and transparency.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.