Revision summary
Ogburn: material culture leads, adaptive culture lags. Gig law, privacy, and bioethics still show that gap. Marx and Weber deny that technology is an uncaused first mover. Movements can lead or block adoption. Valid as strain theory, not as determinism.
Model answer
Introduction
William Ogburn’s cultural lag says material culture, especially technology, changes first and adaptive culture of norms, law, and family trails. The theory is still valid as a diagnostic of strain. It is invalid as a one-way law of gadgets over society.
Body
What still holds
- Digital platforms arrived faster than labour law, privacy, and gig social security.
- Medical technology outran ethics of surrogacy, data, and end-of-life.
- Green Revolution and now climate tools moved faster than agrarian institutions.
Limits in present times
- Karl Marx already made relations of production steer which technologies are adopted.
- Max Weber’s rationalisation is a cultural engine, not a lagging tail.
- Social movements can lead: environmental norms sometimes block a dam or a gene crop before full deployment.
- Gendered unpaid care, after Ann Oakley, may intensify with new gadgets that raise housekeeping standards.
Verdict
- Valid as a middle-range notice of mismatched tempos.
- Invalid as technological determinism.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MAT[Material technology] --> LAG[Adaptive norms law] POW[Class state movements] --> MAT LAG --> STRAIN[Present strain gig data]
Conclusion
Cultural lag remains a useful name for law and norms trailing digital and biomedical change. Present times also show culture and power steering technology. Use Ogburn as a warning, not as a master key.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Are social movements primordial in means and progressive in agenda? Explain
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Does every new app prove cultural lag?
Only if norms and law are actually slower. Some apps follow already marketised culture.
-
Can lag be reduced?
Anticipatory regulation and public debate can shorten it; they do not delete mismatch.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense? -
2018 · Q1(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work -
2018 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Does the collapse of functionalism and bankruptcy of Marxism coincide with the rupture of modernity? Discuss. -
2018 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Define patriarchy. How does patriarchy manifest in interpersonal relations? -
2018 · Q4(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
According to Marx, how are human beings alienated from their human potential and what does he suggest to change this? -
2018 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain with examples, the explanatory and exploratory designs of social research. -
2018 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
What, according to Pareto, are the basic characteristics of elites? Discuss. -
2017 · Q1(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain how sociology has emerged as a distinct discipline based on rationality and scientific tamper
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense?
Sociology
Sociology focuses on interaction as action oriented to others. Weber, Mead, and Goffman named that object. Common sense is Schutz’s unexamined stock of typifications. Durkheim’s rates and caste studies show why everyday talk is not enough. Sociology uses common-sense language and then tests it.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Weber split value-relevance of the problem from value-discipline in proof. The question of modern capitalism is culturally selected. The claimed fact is elective affinity with inner-worldly asceticism. Ideal types organise the comparison. The book does not preach Calvinism as a duty.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work
Sociology
Yes: I and Me are central in Mead. Me is the organised attitudes of others, the self as object. I is the unpredictable response that allows novelty. Play, game, and generalised other form the Me. Blumer’s interactionism inherits the pair.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.