Revision summary
The claim pairs old means with progressive ends. Tilly shows repertoires stick; some Indian movements fit. Digital PIL and majoritarian restoration break the pair. Touraine already mixed cultural means and new agendas. Treat means and agenda as independent variables.
Model answer
Introduction
- The formula splits means and ends: old repertoires of march, shrine, and kinship, with new rights talk. Some movements fit. Many do not. Means can be networked and new; agendas can restore hierarchy.
Body
When the formula fits
- Charles Tilly’s repertoire is sticky: petition, strike, fast, and pilgrimage recur.
- Chipko and some temple-entry or shrine-based mobilisations used familiar sacred and village means for livelihood or dignity claims.
- Identity movements may use caste association form for reservation, a modern state agenda.
When it fails
- Progressive means can be digital campaigns and PIL, not primordial at all.
- Agendas may be majoritarian restoration, not emancipation.
- Alain Touraine’s new social movements already mixed cultural means and post-wage agendas.
- Farmers’ tractor marches were industrial means with mixed agrarian agendas.
Explanation
- Means and agendas vary independently. Primordial and progressive are not a necessary pair.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MEANS[Means old or new] --> IND[Independent mix] AG[Agenda restore or reform] --> IND PAIR[Primordial means progressive agenda] --> PART[Only some cases]
Conclusion
Some Indian movements wrap new claims in old ritual means. The generalisation is false. Means can be modern and agendas conservative, or the reverse. Analyse each movement’s repertoire and aim.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Does scientific method make Sociology a Science? Illustrate your answer with Durkheim's method.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is a religious fast always primordial?
As a technique it is old. As media spectacle it can be thoroughly modern.
-
Are identity movements progressive by definition?
No. Recognition claims can include equal rights or exclusive purity.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q2(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain democracy as an order of society. What are the factors preventing people's participation in politics? -
2020 · Q8(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine how social movements come to an end. Illustrate with examples. -
2018 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the challenges thrown by religious revivalism to a secular nation-state. -
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India -
2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the dynamics of pressure group in multi-party political system -
2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the importance of 'power elite' in democracy. -
2016 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the role of protest movements in changing the status of Dalits in India. -
2016 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
To what extent revolution replaces the existing order of society? Discuss.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
The focal point of sociology rests on interaction. How do you distinguish it from common sense?
Sociology
Sociology focuses on interaction as action oriented to others. Weber, Mead, and Goffman named that object. Common sense is Schutz’s unexamined stock of typifications. Durkheim’s rates and caste studies show why everyday talk is not enough. Sociology uses common-sense language and then tests it.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Distinguish between fact and value in Weber's Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Weber split value-relevance of the problem from value-discipline in proof. The question of modern capitalism is culturally selected. The claimed fact is elective affinity with inner-worldly asceticism. Ideal types organise the comparison. The book does not preach Calvinism as a duty.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2018 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Do you think T and Me are central terms in Mead's work
Sociology
Yes: I and Me are central in Mead. Me is the organised attitudes of others, the self as object. I is the unpredictable response that allows novelty. Play, game, and generalised other form the Me. Blumer’s interactionism inherits the pair.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.