Revision summary
New social movements organise identity, ecology, gender, and everyday life beside the wage. Touraine, Melucci, and Offe named the European type. India: Chipko, Narmada, women’s and Dalit movements. Recognition and redistribution often travel together. Repertoires of strike and march are not abandoned.
Model answer
Introduction
New social movements are those that, from the late twentieth century, organised around identity, ecology, gender, and peace as much as around the wage. What is new is not the fact of protest. It is the claim, the base, and often the style.
Body
Against the old labour-party model
- Alain Touraine and Alberto Melucci stressed identity, everyday life, and cultural codes.
- Claus Offe noted a shift from distribution to grammar of forms of life, with middle-class and educated cores.
- They are not always “post-material” in poor societies; ecology and displacement are material.
What is new
- Bases beyond the industrial workplace: students, women, Adivasis, urban neighbourhoods.
- Issues of body, river, language, and dignity, not only wage and hours.
- Network forms, media, and NGOs beside the classic union and party.
- Global framing: environment and human rights talk.
Indian reference
- Chipko and later Narmada Bachao Andolan tied ecology to livelihood and displacement.
- Women’s movements after the 1970s raised dowry, work, and law, a gendered public that the old left had underplayed.
- Dalit, Adivasi, and sexuality movements claim recognition as well as redistribution, which Nancy Fraser’s pair helps name.
- Farmers’ and informal workers’ protests show that “new” and “old” often mix.
What is not new
- Charles Tilly’s repertoire still includes strike, march, and petition.
- Caste associations and religious mobilisations use new media for old closures.
Caution
- “New” can be a North-Atlantic periodisation. Indian movements long mixed land, faith, and community.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD OLD[Labour party wage] --> MIX[Indian mix] NSM[Identity ecology gender] --> MIX NSM --> NET[Networks media NGO] MIX --> CLAIM[Recognition and redistribution]
Conclusion
What is new is the centrality of identity, ecology, gender, and networked form beside the wage. In India, Chipko, Narmada, women’s and Dalit movements illustrate that mix. The wage and the party have not vanished; the agenda has widened.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the regional variations of kinship system in Indian society
Next question on this syllabus topic (2017 · Q7(b)). View answer →
-
Are farmers’ movements new social movements?
They are often old in class base and new in media and rights framing. The label is a tool, not a box.
-
Did NSM replace class?
They decentred the factory as the only site. Class still shapes who can protest and who is heard.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss how "environmentalism" can be explained with new social movements approach.
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.