Revision summary
Durkheim: sacred and profane as the basic religious classification. The sacred is society’s force in ritual and church. Festivals and civil religion still fit. Weber, Marx, and gender show meaning and domination the split misses. Lived religion often leaks across the border.
Model answer
Introduction
Emile Durkheim treated the sacred and the profane as the elementary classification of religious life. The sacred is set apart and forbidden; the profane is ordinary practical life. Assessment must keep the power of that split and its limits for salvation religions and inequality.
Body
The notion
- In The Elementary Forms, religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, uniting a church.
- The sacred is society’s ideal force, felt in collective effervescence.
- Taboo and ritual maintain the border.
Assessment, strengths
- It explains ritual solidarity without requiring a particular god.
- National days, stadiums, and Indian public festivals still mark space and time as set apart.
- Robert Bellah’s civil religion is a Durkheimian cousin.
Assessment, limits
- Max Weber stressed theodicy, prophets, and inner-worldly asceticism, which a clan totem model underplays.
- Karl Marx stressed class veil and protest. The “church” is stratified by caste and gender.
- Everyday lived religion mixes kitchen and shrine, so the border is leaky.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD REL[Religion] --> S[Sacred set apart] REL --> P[Profane ordinary] S --> E[Effervescence church] W[Weber Marx gender] --> LIM[Limits]
Conclusion
The sacred–profane split remains a strong tool for ritual and group ideal. It is a weaker tool for meaning, domination, and porous domestic worship. Use it for solidarity; do not use it as the whole of religion.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What is new in 'new social movement '? Elaborate your answer with special reference to India
Next question on this syllabus topic (2017 · Q6(b)). View answer →
-
Is the flag sacred in Durkheim’s sense?
It can be, if set apart by ritual interdicts. It may lack a full church.
-
Did he deny gods?
He explained gods as society represented. He did not study them only as error.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2020 · Q5(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Does the institution of marriage continue to be sacred in Indian society? Comments.
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.