Revision summary
Informalisation is work without secure contract and social security. Hart named the sector; Breman showed Indian footloose labour as a system. PLFS files record a large uncovered workforce. Gender and caste sort who remains informal. It is a capitalist form, not a pre-modern leftover.
Model answer
Introduction
Informalisation is the spread of work without secure contract, social security, or recognised union rights. In India it is not a leftover of tradition. It is how much of capitalism actually hires.
Body
The meaning
- Keith Hart named the informal sector in African cities. Jan Breman showed footloose labour in India as a system, not a waiting room for factories.
- Informalisation can mean never-formal work, or the stripping of once-formal mills and public jobs.
Indian reference
- PLFS and earlier NSSO files show a large majority of workers outside formal social security.
- Construction, home-based garments, domestic work, and gig platforms extend the pattern into cities.
- Caste and gender organise who stays informal: Dalit and Adivasi bodies in hazardous tasks, women in unpaid and piece-rate care-linked work.
Relation to capital
- Karl Marx’s reserve army and Harry Braverman’s deskilling help, but Indian informality also uses putting-out and labour contractors.
- The state may celebrate ease of business while the Factories Act circle shrinks.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD INF[Informalisation] --> NO[No contract security union] INF --> IN[India majority PLFS] IN --> C[Contractor caste gender] CAP[Capital] --> INF
Conclusion
Informalisation is insecure, uncovered labour as a durable form. In India it is majority practice, shaped by contractors, caste, and gender, not a brief stop on the way to Fordist jobs.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Give an assessment of Durkheimian notion of 'sacred' and 'profane' in sociology of religion
Next question on this syllabus topic (2017 · Q5(c)). View answer →
-
Is informal work the same as illegal work?
No. Much of it is lawful yet uncovered. Illegality is a separate question.
-
Does growth automatically formalise labour?
Indian experience shows growth with persistent informality.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critically analyse Talcott Parsons conception of pattern variable' -
2017 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss distinct sociological method adopted by Emile Durkheim in his study of 'suicide' -
2017 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Analyse Marxian conception of historical materialism as a critique of Hegelian dialectics -
2017 · Q5(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Give an assessment of Durkheimian notion of 'sacred' and 'profane' in sociology of religion -
2017 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What is new in 'new social movement '? Elaborate your answer with special reference to India -
2017 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Discuss the regional variations of kinship system in Indian society -
2016 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Evaluate Marx's ideas on mode of production -
2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Describe the functional prerequisites of social system as given by Talcott Parsons. Examined in the context of a university as a social system.
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations
Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx
Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.