Q8(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks · 2 min read

← Q7(b) Q1(e) →

How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss

Topic: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx. Syllabus: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx — Historical materialism, mode of production, alienation, class struggle; Emile Durkheim — Division of labour, social fact, suicide, religion and society; Max Weber — Social action, ideal types, authority, bureaucracy, protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism; Talcott Parsons — Social system, pattern variables; Robert K. Merton — Latent and manifest functions, conformity and deviance, reference groups; Mead — Self and identity. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2025 and Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx.

Revision summary

NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.

Model answer

Introduction

Civil society organisations sit between household, market and state. Non-governmental organisations and self-help groups are two familiar forms in development practice. They claim to work at the grassroots: the hamlet, the slum, the women’s meeting under a tree. The sociological question is how they actually produce social change, and for whom.

Body

How they contribute

NGOs may deliver services the state undersupplies—health camps, legal aid, watershed works—or they may mobilise rights, as in campaigns for information, forest rights or disability. They translate local trouble into files, courts and media. Antonio Gramsci’s civil society is a field of hegemony as well as resistance; Tocqueville’s associations train citizens. SHGs, especially women’s groups linked to banks after NABARD’s programme, create small credit, thrift and a public female voice in villages where the panchayat was a male space. Kerala’s Kudumbashree and SEWA’s organising of informal women workers show that livelihood and citizenship can move together. Sanitation, immunisation and school attendance campaigns often run through such groups. At their best they thicken social capital in Coleman’s sense and expand capabilities in Sen’s sense.

Grassroots change is not automatic

Critics of NGOisation argue that donor-funded organisations can depoliticise struggle, professionalise leaders, and substitute project cycles for movements. Sangeeta Kamat and others described this risk. SHGs can become instruments of microfinance extraction, or of party and caste capture, rather than sisterhood. Men may take the loan while women carry the liability. NGOs may bypass panchayats and weaken already thin local democracy, or they may train panchayat women. Scale is limited: a successful cluster does not equal agrarian reform. The state may outsource its duties and then blame civil society for gaps.

Contribution is therefore conditional. NGOs and SHGs change grassroots life when they organise voice and resources without replacing politics, and when the poor remain members rather than beneficiaries on a list. They fail when they become a parallel bureaucracy of projects. Indian illustrations should keep both the SEWA and Kudumbashree yield and the microcredit caution. Change is grassroots only if local people can refuse a project and still have a public voice.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  CS[Civil society] --> NGO[NGOs services and rights]
  CS --> SHG[SHGs credit and voice]
  NGO --> GR[Grassroots change]
  SHG --> GR
  GR --> Y[Livelihood gender citizenship]
  GR --> R[NGOisation capture risk]

Conclusion

NGOs and SHGs can shift credit, care, rights and women’s public presence at the grassroots. They are not a substitute for a capable, accountable state or for redistribution. Civil society contributes to change when it organises people, not when it only delivers a scheme.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Can Merton's reference group theory be relevant in understanding 'identity making' in digital world? Explain.

    View answer →

  2. 2025 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Highlight the main features of historical materialism as propounded by Marx. How far is this theory relevant in understanding contemporary societies? Explain

    View answer →

  3. 2025 · Q6(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations

    View answer →

  4. 2025 · Q7(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain

    View answer →

  5. 2024 · Q1(e) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    What are the 'basic and irreducible' functions of the family as proposed by Talcott Parsons? Explain.

    View answer →

  6. 2024 · Q3(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Describe the main idea of Max Weber's book, *The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism* as a critique of Marxism

    View answer →

  7. 2024 · Q3(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Critically explain the salient features of 'alienation' as propounded by Karl Marx

    View answer →

  8. 2024 · Q4(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Define the concept of 'gig' economy and discuss its impact on the labour market and workers' social security net

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.

Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.

Q2(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

Highlight the main features of historical materialism as propounded by Marx. How far is this theory relevant in understanding contemporary societies? Explain

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Historical materialism explains social change from production, property and class struggle. Base and superstructure name the constraint of material life on law, politics and ideas. Capitalism is defined by wage labour, surplus value and contradiction. The theory remains relevant for global accumulation, gig work and India’s informal labour. Weberian status, feminist unpaid labour and culture mark its limits. Use it as a diagnostic of inequality, not as a total theory of society.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.