Q2(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2015 · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q2(a) Q4(c) →

"Self and society are twin-born " Examine the statement of Mead.

Topic: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx. Syllabus: Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx — Historical materialism, mode of production, alienation, class struggle; Emile Durkheim — Division of labour, social fact, suicide, religion and society; Max Weber — Social action, ideal types, authority, bureaucracy, protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism; Talcott Parsons — Social system, pattern variables; Robert K. Merton — Latent and manifest functions, conformity and deviance, reference groups; Mead — Self and identity. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2015 and Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx.

Revision summary

Mead: mind, self, and society arise together in significant symbols. Play, game, and generalised other form the “me”; the “I” answers. The claim rejects a pre-social self and a society without selves. Durkheim, Weber, Cooley, and Blumer sit nearby; class and caste still structure which others count.

Model answer

Introduction

George Herbert Mead argued that the self is not a private soul that later enters society. Mind, self, and society arise together in communication. The statement “twin-born” names that simultaneous birth, not two finished things glued later.

Body

Mead’s mechanism

  • The gesture becomes a significant symbol when it arouses in the speaker the same response it arouses in the other, as language does.
  • Role-taking: the child plays particular others, then the organised game, then the generalised other of the group.
  • The “I” is the spontaneous response. The “me” is the organised set of others’ attitudes. Self is their conversation.

Why twins, not sequence

  • Emile Durkheim stressed external social facts. Mead agrees that the group is prior as a conversation, but he refuses a self-less heap of constraints.
  • Charles Horton Cooley’s looking-glass self is a neighbour: we see ourselves in others’ imagined judgments.
  • Max Weber’s social action already orients to others. Mead supplies the social psychology of how that orientation is learned.

Examination

  • The claim attacks both a Robinsonade individual and a society that never lives in persons.
  • Karl Marx’s species-being and later interactionists, including Herbert Blumer’s symbolic interactionism, extend the same direction.
  • Limits: Mead underplayed class, caste, and state power that structure whose “generalised other” counts. Talcott Parsons later folded the “me” into socialisation, which can flatten conflict.

Indian illustration

  • Caste and gender train the generalised other early. SHG talk and school peer groups show new others without erasing the twin birth.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  COM[Communication symbols] --> RT[Role-taking]
  RT --> ME[Me generalised other]
  RT --> I[I spontaneous]
  ME --> SELF[Self]
  I --> SELF
  SELF --> SOC[Society in persons]

Conclusion

  • Mead’s statement holds: self and society are born in the same communicative process of role-taking. Durkheim’s constraint and Marx’s structure still organise which others matter. The twin image fails only if it is read as harmony without power.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2017 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Critically analyse Talcott Parsons conception of pattern variable'

    View answer →

  2. 2016 · Q1(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Evaluate Marx's ideas on mode of production

    View answer →

  3. 2016 · Q2(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Describe the functional prerequisites of social system as given by Talcott Parsons. Examined in the context of a university as a social system.

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q3(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Analyze the manifest and latent functions of 'security of the tenure of bureaucrats' in the light of Merton's theory.

    View answer →

  5. 2015 · Q1(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Discuss the relevance of historical method in the study of society.

    View answer →

  6. 2015 · Q2(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Discuss the role of Calvinist ethic in the development of Capitalism.

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q4(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks

    "Anomie is rooted in social structure." Explain with reference to R.K. Merton's contribution.

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q5(d) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Is male authority absent in matrilineal society? Discuss.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do 'Civil Society Organizations' such as 'NGOs' and 'Self-Help Groups' contribute to grassroot level social changes? Discuss

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

NGOs and SHGs are civil society forms between family, market and state. They contribute through services, rights mobilisation, thrift, credit and women’s public voice. SEWA, Kudumbashree and SHG-bank linkage are standard Indian illustrations. Social capital and capabilities names for the gain. NGOisation, donor dependence and microcredit capture are the critical limits. Grassroots change holds when members remain political subjects, not only project targets.

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

How do theories of Marx, Weber and Durkheim differ in understanding religion? Explain

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Marx treats religion as ideological consolation and mystification in class society. Durkheim treats religion as the sacred form of social solidarity and classification. Weber treats religion as meaningful ethic that can steer economic and political action. Differences follow the questions of critique, function and interpretation. Marx expects unmasking; Durkheim expects the sacred to migrate; Weber traces disenchantment. Do not flatten the three into a single sentence about the importance of faith.

Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks

What do you understand by gender-based domestic division of labour? Is it undergoing a change in the wake of increasing participation of women in formal employment? Clarify your answer with illustrations

Sociological Thinkers: Karl Marx

Gender-based domestic division assigns unpaid household and care work mainly to women. Oakley, Hartmann and Hochschild made that work theoretically central. Women’s formal employment has produced dual burdens more often than equal sharing. Outsourcing to paid domestic workers relocates rather than ends gendered care. India’s Time Use Survey shows a large unpaid-work gap by sex. Change is lagged and class-specific, not automatic with a salary slip.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.