Revision summary
A movement is sustained organised challenge, not a one-day crowd. Conditions: strain plus belief, resources, opportunity, and identity. Marx, Smelser, resource mobilisation, Weber’s charisma, and Durkheim’s community explain the passage. Indian Dalit, farmer, and women’s networks illustrate scale-up or stall. Without organisation, action remains an episode.
Model answer
Introduction
- Collective action is joint behaviour in a situation: a crowd, a strike day, a riot. A social movement is a sustained, organised challenge with a programme, identity, and some continuity. Transformation needs conditions, not only anger.
Body
From episode to movement
- Neil Smelser’s value-added sequence: structural conduciveness, strain, generalised belief, precipitating event, mobilisation, and social control. Missing a step, the episode stays an episode.
- Resource mobilisation (McCarthy and Zald): money, leaders, networks, and media. Ideology without organisation dies.
- Political opportunity: splits in elites, elections, and courts, which Indian caste and farmer agitations have used.
Identity and framing
- Karl Marx: class-in-itself becomes class-for-itself when organisation and a theory of interest appear.
- New social movements add identity, as in gender and environment, after the limits of a pure class script.
- Emile Durkheim’s effervescence can found a crowd. Continuity needs a moral community, not only a night of assembly.
- Max Weber’s charisma can found a movement; routinisation into staff decides survival.
Indian illustrations
- From atrocity or price spike to a Dalit panther-type or farmer union form when associations, law cases, and symbols persist.
- SHG networks can scale women’s local action into a public, or remain micro-credit without a movement.
When it fails
- Repression, co-optation, or a belief that names no opponent keep action as a one-day crowd.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CA[Collective action] --> FR[Framing identity] CA --> RES[Resources organisation] CA --> OPP[Political opportunity] FR --> SM[Social movement] RES --> SM OPP --> SM
Conclusion
Collective action becomes a social movement when strain is framed, resources and opportunities are organised, and identity lasts beyond the event. Marx, Smelser, Weber, and Durkheim name pieces of that passage. Anger is a start, not the transformation.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Caste ideology appears to have strengthened democracy .Comment.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2015 · Q7(c)). View answer →
-
Is a riot a social movement?
It is collective action. It becomes a movement only if organisation and programme persist.
-
Do social media crowds count?
They can frame and assemble. Without continuity and claim-making they remain episodes.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the changing interface between state and civil society in post-independent India -
2017 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Examine the dynamics of pressure group in multi-party political system -
2016 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
Discuss the importance of 'power elite' in democracy. -
2016 · Q6(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Examine the role of protest movements in changing the status of Dalits in India. -
2016 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
To what extent revolution replaces the existing order of society? Discuss. -
2015 · Q5(b) · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
"Ideology is crucial for social transformation in a democracy." Discuss. -
2015 · Q7(c) · Sociology GS 1 · 15 marks
Caste ideology appears to have strengthened democracy .Comment. -
2015 · Q8(a) · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
"Globalization involves deterritorialization ." Examine with reference to the nation-state."
More from this topic
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 10 marks
How can you assess the significance of social movements in the digital era? Explain
Politics and Society
Social movements now use platforms for recruitment, framing and witnessing. Connective action personalises protest and lowers coordination costs. Significance is high for speed, scale and agenda setting. Limits include digital divide, surveillance, rumour and weak staying power. Older resource and opportunity theories still explain durable success. Indian protests and relief campaigns show amplification, not replacement, of the street.
Q4(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
What would you identify as the similarities and differences in the elite theories of Mosca, Michels and Pareto? Discuss their main/crucial issues
Politics and Society
Mosca: an organised ruling class justified by a political formula. Michels: organisation produces oligarchy even in egalitarian parties. Pareto: elites circulate; lions and foxes name styles of rule. Similarities: minority power, scepticism toward literal popular rule and toward Marxian class monopoly of explanation. Differences: political formula versus party oligarchy versus psychological residues. Crucial issues: accountability, recruitment and whether democracy can discipline elites.
Q3(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Sociology GS 1 · 20 marks
Are pressure groups a threat to or a necessary element of democracy? Explain with suitable illustrations
Politics and Society
Pressure groups influence policy without ordinarily taking office. Pluralists treat them as necessary vehicles of interest articulation. Critics note unequal organising power, capture and majoritarian or caste intimidation. Olson explains why concentrated interests beat diffuse majorities. Indian farmers’ protests, chambers of commerce and caste associations show both voices and capture. The answer is conditional: necessary, and dangerous without equality and transparency.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.