Revision summary
Look East recast the north-east from a cul-de-sac to an ASEAN bridge. Kaladan, the IMT highway, and BIMSTEC are the hardware of that claim. Insurgency, drugs, and Myanmar’s coup are the security implications. Ecology and tribal land are the domestic social implications. Gains remain below promise until corridors actually run and stay safe.
Model answer
Introduction
Look East, later Act East, treated India’s north-east as a bridge to ASEAN rather than a dead-end frontier. Implications are connectivity, security, ecology, and uneven local gain.
Body
Intended implications
- Roads, the Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit to Myanmar, the India–Myanmar–Thailand highway, and border haats were meant to end the region’s partition-era isolation.
- Trade with Bangladesh and Myanmar, plus BIMSTEC, would give landlocked north-eastern States a Bay of Bengal outlet.
- Tourism, education, and cultural diplomacy with South-East Asia use ethnic kinships across the border.
Security and political implications
- Insurgency, arms, and narcotics routes can thicken with the same corridors that carry legal trade.
- Myanmar’s post-2021 turmoil showed that Act East hardware depends on a neighbour’s order.
- China watches the same geography from the north. Connectivity is also a strategic denial and a vulnerability.
Development implications
- Some State capitals gain logistics jobs. Hill ecologies and tribal land rights face dams, highways, and in-migration.
- The policy can look Delhi-centric unless local governments and Inner Line regimes are part of the design.
- Bangladesh transit and water politics (Ganga, Teesta) sit next door; the north-east is not only a Myanmar story.
Balance
- Look East is the best available growth story for the region. Delivery gaps and conflict in Myanmar have so far kept implications below the brochure.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD LE[Look East Act East] --> K[Kaladan IMT highway] K --> B[North-east as bridge] M[Myanmar instability insurgency] --> R[Risks] B --> I[Implications mixed] R --> I
Conclusion
Look East implies a north-east that is a commercial and cultural bridge to ASEAN. It also implies new security, land, and ecological pressures. The implication is opportunity plus exposure, not an automatic peace dividend.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain the factors which justify India's claim for a permanent seat at the UN security council
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q7). View answer →
-
Has Look East ended north-eastern isolation?
Partly, via air and some roads. Full land-bridge effects wait on Myanmar and on last-mile Indian infrastructure.
-
Is China the only implication?
No. Bangladesh, Myanmar, local insurgency, and ecology are equally central for the region’s people.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Does the idea of the 21st century as 'Asian century' continue to remain feasible given the growing friction between India and China? -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia? -
2023 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia? -
2022 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the ways and means to realise greater economic co-operation among the Member States of South Asia. -
2022 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the steps required to realise hydro-co-operation between India and Bangladesh. -
2021 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the strategic implications of India's Look East Policy transforming into Act East Policy. -
2021 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Why South Asia is considered as the world's politically and economically least integrated region? Explain -
2021 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Relations between India and Russia are rooted in history, mutual trust and mutually beneficial cooperation. Discuss
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the main limitations of the comparative method to the study of Political Science.
Comparative Politics
Comparison substitutes for experiment, as Lijphart argued. Mill’s designs fail when variables outnumber cases. Galton’s problem and conceptual stretching are standing limits. Official data and Eurocentric concepts add political distortion. The method is disciplined inference, not a controlled trial.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the main challenges faced by the developing countries in the era of globalisation?
Globalisation
Globalisation opens markets and tightens external rules. Wallerstein’s hierarchy and Prebisch’s trade concern still describe many late developers. Capital flight, TRIPS, and farm subsidies in the North cut policy space. Inequality, informality, and climate costs are domestic faces of the same pressure. Regional and South–South bargains are the usual reply, not autarky.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the commonalities between the Marxist and Realist approach to the study of International Politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
Both approaches deny that trade and law automatically pacify world politics. Carr’s critique of utopia feeds realist and Marxist readings. Morgenthau and Waltz stress State power; Lenin and Wallerstein stress capital and hierarchy. Institutions are treated as masks or tools, not as a world government in waiting. The commonality is conflictual materialism; the split is State versus class.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.