Revision summary
The 1996 Ganga Treaty is the working model of dry-season sharing. The Joint Rivers Commission is the institutional means. Teesta remains the political missing piece. Flood data, Brahmaputra transparency, and inland navigation are the next hardware steps. Indian federal politics is as decisive as diplomacy with Dhaka.
Model answer
Introduction
India and Bangladesh share the Ganga–Brahmaputra–Meghna basin. Hydro-cooperation is water-sharing, navigation, power, and flood data. Treaties exist. Teesta and some upstream projects still wait.
Body
What is already in place
- The 1996 Ganga Water Sharing Treaty at Farakka set a dry-season formula for thirty years and a Joint Committee.
- The Joint Rivers Commission, from the 1970s, is the standing bilateral body for fifty-plus shared rivers.
- Power trade, the Sundarbans, and inland protocol routes show that water is also electricity and cargo, not only a barrage dispute.
Steps still required
- Conclude a Teesta arrangement that West Bengal’s politics can live with, or a creative package of storage, canals, and seasonal guarantees.
- Share flood and monsoon data in real time; climate extremes make last-minute warning a humanitarian step.
- Joint basin planning on the Brahmaputra and Barak, including transparent talk on Tipaimukh-type projects, to cut Dhaka’s fear of upstream control.
- Navigation protocols, dredging, and last-mile inland ports so Bangladesh gains transit value, not only water volume.
- Sub-regional hooks: BBIN and BIMSTEC energy so Bhutanese hydropower and Indian grids include Bangladesh as a paying partner.
- Domestic federal coordination in India, because water is a State subject in practice at the political bottleneck.
Spirit
- Hydro-cooperation needs Panchsheel-style non-harm plus engineering. A treaty without federal buy-in will not flow.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Ganga Treaty 1996] --> J[Joint Rivers Commission] T[Teesta deal] --> H[Hydro-cooperation] D[Data navigation power] --> H J --> H
Conclusion
India–Bangladesh hydro-cooperation needs a Teesta settlement, live flood data, joint basin planning, navigation and power links, and Indian federal consensus. The 1996 Ganga Treaty is the template. Completing the unfinished rivers is the step that still defines the relationship.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Explain the significance of Basic Exchange and Co-operation Agreement (BECA) for Indo-US strategic relations.
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Is the Ganga Treaty enough?
It settled Farakka’s worst political fight. Dozens of other rivers, especially Teesta, still need instruments.
-
Does hydropower equal hydro-cooperation?
Power trade helps. Sharing seasonal flow and flood warning is the core of river cooperation.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Does the idea of the 21st century as 'Asian century' continue to remain feasible given the growing friction between India and China? -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia? -
2023 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia? -
2022 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the ways and means to realise greater economic co-operation among the Member States of South Asia. -
2022 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the implications of 'Look-East' Policy on the north-eastern region of India? -
2021 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the strategic implications of India's Look East Policy transforming into Act East Policy. -
2021 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Why South Asia is considered as the world's politically and economically least integrated region? Explain -
2021 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Relations between India and Russia are rooted in history, mutual trust and mutually beneficial cooperation. Discuss
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the main limitations of the comparative method to the study of Political Science.
Comparative Politics
Comparison substitutes for experiment, as Lijphart argued. Mill’s designs fail when variables outnumber cases. Galton’s problem and conceptual stretching are standing limits. Official data and Eurocentric concepts add political distortion. The method is disciplined inference, not a controlled trial.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the main challenges faced by the developing countries in the era of globalisation?
Globalisation
Globalisation opens markets and tightens external rules. Wallerstein’s hierarchy and Prebisch’s trade concern still describe many late developers. Capital flight, TRIPS, and farm subsidies in the North cut policy space. Inequality, informality, and climate costs are domestic faces of the same pressure. Regional and South–South bargains are the usual reply, not autarky.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the commonalities between the Marxist and Realist approach to the study of International Politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
Both approaches deny that trade and law automatically pacify world politics. Carr’s critique of utopia feeds realist and Marxist readings. Morgenthau and Waltz stress State power; Lenin and Wallerstein stress capital and hierarchy. Institutions are treated as masks or tools, not as a world government in waiting. The commonality is conflictual materialism; the split is State versus class.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.