Revision summary
India wants a multipolar order with a reformed Security Council. Multi-alignment replaces single-camp Cold War maps. The Indo-Pacific and the Quad sit beside BRICS and NAM memory. NIEO justice claims return as WTO, climate, and digital rules. The vision mixes realist balancing of China with institutional rule-shaping.
Model answer
Introduction
India’s 21st-century vision is a multipolar, reformed multilateral order in which the Global South has voice and India has a seat at the high table. It is not a call to smash the UN. It is a call to update 1945.
Body
What the vision contains
- Reformed UN Security Council, with India as a permanent member, as the political centrepiece.
- Strategic autonomy and multi-alignment: work with the Quad and with BRICS, with the US and with Russia, without a NATO treaty.
- Rules that are not only Western, yet not a Chinese hierarchy: a free and open Indo-Pacific plus Panchsheel language of coexistence.
- Economic order: WTO reform, climate justice, digital public infrastructure as a Southern offering, and NIEO-like policy space inside globalisation.
- Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam and yoga-era public diplomacy as the cultural dressing of the same claim, which Nye would call soft power.
How it differs from 1974 and from NAM purity
- India now wants to shape rules as a rising power, not only to denounce them as a have-not.
- It accepts globalisation’s markets while demanding fairer fisheries, food, and finance outcomes.
- It treats China as a rival to be balanced, which 1950s coexistence did not have to do in the same way.
Realist and institutional mix
- Waltz and Mearsheimer explain the China-balancing half.
- Keohane’s institutions explain why India still invests in the UN, G20, and WTO rather than in pure self-help.
- The vision therefore is a concert of several poles, not unipolarity and not a revolutionary anti-system.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD V[Indian vision] --> M[Multipolarity autonomy] V --> U[UNSC reform G20] V --> I[Indo-Pacific Quad] V --> S[Global South NIEO spirit]
Conclusion
India’s 21st-century new world order is multipolar, UN-reformed, economically more equal, and Indo-Pacific in geography. Autonomy is the method. A permanent Council seat and Global South voice are the tests of whether the vision is succeeding.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Is this a Chinese-style new order?
No. India rejects a Beijing-centred hierarchy and still uses UN Charter and Quad language against it.
-
Does Vasudhaiva replace national interest?
It is a public-diplomacy frame. Morgenthau’s interest as power still operates in border and nuclear policy.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment. -
2022 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the major factors responsible for a turnaround in the trajectory of India's foreign policy in the post-cold war period -
2022 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
How does India-Israel bilateral ties reflect the autonomy of India's foreign policy choices? -
2021 · Q1(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the five proposals made by India in the recent COP-26 conference held in Glasgow. -
2021 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the philosophical foundations of India's foreign policy. -
2021 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain India's position on the waiver of intellectual property rights on COVID-19 vaccines in WTO. -
2021 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the recent takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban impact India's strategic interests?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the main limitations of the comparative method to the study of Political Science.
Comparative Politics
Comparison substitutes for experiment, as Lijphart argued. Mill’s designs fail when variables outnumber cases. Galton’s problem and conceptual stretching are standing limits. Official data and Eurocentric concepts add political distortion. The method is disciplined inference, not a controlled trial.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the main challenges faced by the developing countries in the era of globalisation?
Globalisation
Globalisation opens markets and tightens external rules. Wallerstein’s hierarchy and Prebisch’s trade concern still describe many late developers. Capital flight, TRIPS, and farm subsidies in the North cut policy space. Inequality, informality, and climate costs are domestic faces of the same pressure. Regional and South–South bargains are the usual reply, not autarky.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the commonalities between the Marxist and Realist approach to the study of International Politics.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
Both approaches deny that trade and law automatically pacify world politics. Carr’s critique of utopia feeds realist and Marxist readings. Morgenthau and Waltz stress State power; Lenin and Wallerstein stress capital and hierarchy. Institutions are treated as masks or tools, not as a world government in waiting. The commonality is conflictual materialism; the split is State versus class.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.