Revision summary
Globalisation is denser cross-border economic and social connection. Wallerstein reads it as world-economy deepening. Bhagwati and institutionalists stress gains and rules. Stiglitz and dependency stress crises and unequal rules. Political backlash and shared sovereignty are part of the consequence set.
Model answer
Introduction
Globalisation is the thickening of cross-border flows of goods, capital, people, data, and rules. The debate is not whether borders still exist. It is who gains, who is exposed, and whether the State remains the master of the process.
Body
What it is
- Intensity and speed of interconnection, not the first caravan in history.
- Production chains, finance, and digital platforms sit beside older trade.
- Immanuel Wallerstein would say it is the latest deepening of a capitalist world-economy, not a sudden flat world.
Consequences: the optimistic case
- Growth through trade, technology diffusion, and poverty reduction in export platforms, as Jagdish Bhagwati-style liberals argue.
- Absolute gains and regimes, in Robert Keohane’s institutionalist language, can make openness self-reinforcing.
- Diasporas and ideas widen choice.
Consequences: the critical case
- Uneven development, footloose capital, and a race on labour and tax.
- Joseph Stiglitz stressed crises from premature financial opening.
- Cultural homogenisation and a democratic deficit in treaty bodies.
- Dependency and world-system writers treat “win–win” as ideology of the core.
Political consequences
- Sovereignty becomes shared with investors and dispute panels.
- Populist backlash is a domestic consequence, not only a Southern complaint.
- Climate and pandemic show that flows carry harm as well as goods.
A working judgment
- Globalisation is structured, not neutral. Consequences depend on position in Wallerstein’s hierarchy and on domestic institutions that Huntington would call the capacity to absorb mobilisation.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD G[Globalisation] --> F[Flows trade capital data] F --> L[Liberal growth regimes] F --> C[Critical hierarchy crises] L --> D[Debate on consequences] C --> D
Conclusion
Globalisation is intensified interdependence of markets, rules, and communication. Liberals count growth and regimes. Critics count hierarchy, volatility, and lost policy space. Both describe real slices. The debate is about distribution and control, not about whether ships move.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The modernization thesis asserts that affluence breeds stable democracy. How do you explain the success of India being the world's largest democracy as an exceptional case?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q4(a)). View answer →
-
Is globalisation the same as Americanisation?
US firms and culture are heavy. China, Gulf capital, and South–South trade show more than one centre.
-
Can a State opt out?
It can slow finance or trade. Full exit is costly. The real choice is how to bargain inside the flows.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics. -
2021 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
"The post-colonial state was thought of an entity that stood outside and above society as an autonomous agency." Explain -
2021 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the emergence of neo-realism and its basic tenets -
2021 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain the impact of electoral systems and cleavages in shaping party systems with reference to developing countries -
2021 · Q4(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
The modernization thesis asserts that affluence breeds stable democracy. How do you explain the success of India being the world's largest democracy as an exceptional case? -
2021 · Q4(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Explain the success of ASEAN as a regional organisation -
2021 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Write about the growing significance of QUAD. -
2021 · Q6(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Write a brief analysis of the ethnic conflicts and cross-border migrations along India-Myanmar and India-Bangladesh borders
More from this topic
Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
NonAlignment 2·0 underscores India's unique aspiration to emerge as a site for an alternative universality. Comment
Comparative Politics
NonAlignment 2.0 (2012) restated strategic autonomy for a China-first, post-NAM world: partner the U.S., do not join it. Alternative universality means rules others can inhabit without becoming Western or Chinese tributaries. India’s civilisational pluralism, Global South voice, and issue-based coalitions are the claimed site. The aspiration is coherent; capacity in the neighbourhood and in manufacturing is the constraint. The risk is exceptionalism dressed as universality.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Trump's unilateral imposition of reciprocal tariffs on scores of countries poses impending threat to the future of the rule-based multilateral global trading system under the WTO. What options do the WTO members have to salvage the organization?
Comparative Politics
Trump’s 2025 reciprocal tariffs, on top of a blocked Appellate Body, treat MFN as optional and threaten WTO as policeman. Salvage options: restore appeals or widen MPIA, plurilaterals, a subsidy-for-S&DT reform bargain, G20 politics, and FTA hedges. India’s stake is public stockholding, digital rules and a forum in which power is not the only law. A variable-geometry WTO is more likely than a 1995 restoration. Letting the organisation die would leave only tariff nationalism.
Q6(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
The tariff threats have pushed India and the European Union closer. Evaluate the India-EU partnership
Comparative Politics
U.S. reciprocal tariffs in 2025 threatened both Indian and EU exports and compressed FTA timelines. The partnership already includes TTC, climate talk, student mobility and a values vocabulary. Friction remains on agriculture, data, CBAM, Russia and human-rights politics. Directionally closer is true; a finished trade-and-tech pole is not yet true. India–EU is the best Western hedge if Washington stays protectionist, not a substitute for U.S. defence enablers.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.