Revision summary
Insurgency and ethnic war in South Asia routinely cross borders. Sanctuary charges, refugees, and military alerts replace trade talks. SAARC and road-and-port plans stall on insecure stretches, including Afghanistan 2021 and Myanmar 2021. Domestic ethnic politics also block a regional “we.” Cooperation needs a security floor that these conflicts remove.
Model answer
Introduction
Ethnic conflict and insurgency in South Asia cross borders. They produce refugees, accusations of sanctuary, and military alerts. Regional cooperation needs trust and open borders. Those conflicts work against both.
Body
Cross-border chains
- Insurgents use neighbouring territory as sanctuary. States then treat neighbours as security problems rather than as market partners.
- Refugee flows, as with Rohingya in Bangladesh and populations after the Myanmar 2021 coup, strain host politics and bilateral agendas.
- Tamil conflict in Sri Lanka, Maoist and hill conflicts, and Afghanistan’s wars after decades of intervention all fed suspicion among capitals.
Direct hits on cooperation
- SAARC cannot run a normal summit politics when terrorism and Kashmir dominate India–Pakistan exchanges.
- Connectivity projects stop at insecure stretches: Afghanistan after August 2021, Myanmar after February 2021, and parts of the North-East–Myanmar frontier.
- Intelligence and army staffs crowd out trade ministries in bilateral time.
Identity politics inside cooperation
- Ethnic parties and diaspora lobbies in one State mobilise against another State’s government, which makes “regional identity” harder than a brochure.
- Majority nationalism in several States reads minority kin across the border as a threat.
- BIMSTEC and SCO then become partial clubs that manage some issues while the full South Asian table stays empty.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[Ethnic conflict insurgency] --> B[Sanctuary refugees] B --> T[Trust failure] T --> S[SAARC connectivity stall]
Conclusion
Ethnic war and insurgency hamper South Asian cooperation by closing borders, blocking summits, and turning neighbours into security files. Functional trade cannot spill over, in Mitrany’s sense, while sanctuary and refugee crises remain first.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the ways and means to realise greater economic co-operation among the Member States of South Asia.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2022 · Q5(b)). View answer →
-
Is terrorism the only block to SAARC?
It is a central India–Pakistan block. Asymmetry, China, and weak institutions also matter. Insurgency is one sufficient stopper among several.
-
Can sub-regional groups ignore ethnic conflict?
They can work around one dyad, as BIMSTEC does with Pakistan. They cannot ignore a war on their own roads, as with Myanmar.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Does the idea of the 21st century as 'Asian century' continue to remain feasible given the growing friction between India and China? -
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia? -
2022 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the ways and means to realise greater economic co-operation among the Member States of South Asia. -
2022 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the steps required to realise hydro-co-operation between India and Bangladesh. -
2022 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the implications of 'Look-East' Policy on the north-eastern region of India? -
2021 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the strategic implications of India's Look East Policy transforming into Act East Policy. -
2021 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Why South Asia is considered as the world's politically and economically least integrated region? Explain -
2021 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Relations between India and Russia are rooted in history, mutual trust and mutually beneficial cooperation. Discuss
More from this topic
Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Does the idea of the 21st century as 'Asian century' continue to remain feasible given the growing friction between India and China?
India and South Asia
The Asian century meant a shift of growth and weight to Asia with China and India as co-engines. Doklam, Galwan, a hard LAC and Chinese Indian Ocean presence make China India’s central strategic problem. Trade can continue without a political concert; the Quad and BRI are rival organising projects. Economically the shift to Asia can still happen; politically the century looks contested or bipolar, not harmonious. Feasible as theatre of world politics, not as a Sino-Indian team.
Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia?
India and South Asia
Regionness is shared political identity plus working institutions. South Asia has a dominant India, a blocked India–Pakistan pair, and Chinese alternatives for smaller States. SAARC consensus cannot produce EU-style spillover. Security is a conflict complex, not a community. BIMSTEC is a work-around that still does not make a South Asian region.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the implications of 'Look-East' Policy on the north-eastern region of India?
India and South Asia
Look East recast the north-east from a cul-de-sac to an ASEAN bridge. Kaladan, the IMT highway, and BIMSTEC are the hardware of that claim. Insurgency, drugs, and Myanmar’s coup are the security implications. Ecology and tribal land are the domestic social implications. Gains remain below promise until corridors actually run and stay safe.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.