Revision summary
The Asian century meant a shift of growth and weight to Asia with China and India as co-engines. Doklam, Galwan, a hard LAC and Chinese Indian Ocean presence make China India’s central strategic problem. Trade can continue without a political concert; the Quad and BRI are rival organising projects. Economically the shift to Asia can still happen; politically the century looks contested or bipolar, not harmonious. Feasible as theatre of world politics, not as a Sino-Indian team.
Model answer
Introduction
The Asian century is the claim that this century’s growth, population and eventually security weight would sit in Asia, with China and India as co-engines beside Japan, Korea and ASEAN. Growing friction between India and China asks whether that co-engine still exists. The idea remains feasible as arithmetic. It is less feasible as a shared political project.
Body
Why it looked feasible
East Asian industrialisation, China’s rise, and India’s post-1991 growth produced a shift of GDP and manufacturing toward Asia. Demography, a middle class, and regional production networks (even after deglobalisation) still point east of Suez. An Asian century did not require India–China friendship. It required both to grow inside one world-economy.
What friction does
Doklam 2017, Galwan 2020, a militarised Line of Actual Control, and China’s partnerships with Pakistan and in the Indian Ocean (Hambantota, other ports) turn China from a fellow Asian riser into India’s principal strategic problem. Trade remains large, but investment screening, app bans, and border deaths poison the political story of a joint Asian leadership. The Belt and Road is a Chinese order, not a Sino-Indian one. If Asia’s security splits into a Chinese sphere and an Indo-Pacific coalition around the Quad, the century is Asian in location and bipolar in structure. That is not the harmonious Asian century of early 2000s speeches.
- Friction also wastes resources: both states arm the Himalaya; India must still grow with a two-front problem; China must still manage the United States. Waltz would say two large neighbours in the same system tend toward rivalry. Kant’s pacific federation is not the LAC.
Verdict
The Asian century continues as a feasible economic description if China and India keep growing even while they quarrel — just as Europe’s century of power included Franco-German enmity. It does not continue as a feasible concert. Leadership of Asia will be contested. ASEAN will try to avoid choosing. India’s role becomes hinge of a multipolar Asia, not co-chair of a Beijing-friendly century. Feasible, then, with a changed meaning: Asia as the main theatre of world politics, not Asia as a team.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD AC[Asian century claim] --> G[China plus India growth] F[India-China friction] --> LAC[LAC Galwan Doklam] F --> BRI[BRI Indian Ocean] LAC --> B[Bipolar Asian security] G -.still possible.-> E[Economic shift]
Conclusion
India–China friction does not cancel Asian economic weight. It cancels the idea of a joint, peaceful Asian leadership. The Asian century remains feasible as a shift of wealth and attention. It is no longer feasible as a Sino-Indian partnership project.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia?
Next question on this syllabus topic (2023 · Q5(b)). View answer →
-
Can trade save the Asian century?
Trade keeps the economic shift alive. It has not produced a security community. That split is the answer.
-
Is Japan still part of the Asian century?
Yes as capital and technology. Politically Japan is in the Quad, which is one reason the century is not China-led by default.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia? -
2023 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia? -
2022 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the ways and means to realise greater economic co-operation among the Member States of South Asia. -
2022 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the steps required to realise hydro-co-operation between India and Bangladesh. -
2022 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the implications of 'Look-East' Policy on the north-eastern region of India? -
2021 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the strategic implications of India's Look East Policy transforming into Act East Policy. -
2021 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Why South Asia is considered as the world's politically and economically least integrated region? Explain -
2021 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
Relations between India and Russia are rooted in history, mutual trust and mutually beneficial cooperation. Discuss
More from this topic
Q5(d) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia?
India and South Asia
Insurgency and ethnic war in South Asia routinely cross borders. Sanctuary charges, refugees, and military alerts replace trade talks. SAARC and road-and-port plans stall on insecure stretches, including Afghanistan 2021 and Myanmar 2021. Domestic ethnic politics also block a regional “we.” Cooperation needs a security floor that these conflicts remove.
Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia?
India and South Asia
Regionness is shared political identity plus working institutions. South Asia has a dominant India, a blocked India–Pakistan pair, and Chinese alternatives for smaller States. SAARC consensus cannot produce EU-style spillover. Security is a conflict complex, not a community. BIMSTEC is a work-around that still does not make a South Asian region.
Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
What are the implications of 'Look-East' Policy on the north-eastern region of India?
India and South Asia
Look East recast the north-east from a cul-de-sac to an ASEAN bridge. Kaladan, the IMT highway, and BIMSTEC are the hardware of that claim. Insurgency, drugs, and Myanmar’s coup are the security implications. Ecology and tribal land are the domestic social implications. Gains remain below promise until corridors actually run and stay safe.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.