Q6(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks · 2 min read

Q5(b) →

Does the idea of the 21st century as 'Asian century' continue to remain feasible given the growing friction between India and China?

Topic: India and South Asia. Syllabus: India and South Asia: Regional Co-operation; South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation; South Asian Economic cooperation; Impediments to regional co-operation; India and the Look East / Act East policy. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and India and South Asia.

Revision summary

The Asian century meant a shift of growth and weight to Asia with China and India as co-engines. Doklam, Galwan, a hard LAC and Chinese Indian Ocean presence make China India’s central strategic problem. Trade can continue without a political concert; the Quad and BRI are rival organising projects. Economically the shift to Asia can still happen; politically the century looks contested or bipolar, not harmonious. Feasible as theatre of world politics, not as a Sino-Indian team.

Model answer

Introduction

The Asian century is the claim that this century’s growth, population and eventually security weight would sit in Asia, with China and India as co-engines beside Japan, Korea and ASEAN. Growing friction between India and China asks whether that co-engine still exists. The idea remains feasible as arithmetic. It is less feasible as a shared political project.

Body

Why it looked feasible

East Asian industrialisation, China’s rise, and India’s post-1991 growth produced a shift of GDP and manufacturing toward Asia. Demography, a middle class, and regional production networks (even after deglobalisation) still point east of Suez. An Asian century did not require India–China friendship. It required both to grow inside one world-economy.

What friction does

Doklam 2017, Galwan 2020, a militarised Line of Actual Control, and China’s partnerships with Pakistan and in the Indian Ocean (Hambantota, other ports) turn China from a fellow Asian riser into India’s principal strategic problem. Trade remains large, but investment screening, app bans, and border deaths poison the political story of a joint Asian leadership. The Belt and Road is a Chinese order, not a Sino-Indian one. If Asia’s security splits into a Chinese sphere and an Indo-Pacific coalition around the Quad, the century is Asian in location and bipolar in structure. That is not the harmonious Asian century of early 2000s speeches.

  • Friction also wastes resources: both states arm the Himalaya; India must still grow with a two-front problem; China must still manage the United States. Waltz would say two large neighbours in the same system tend toward rivalry. Kant’s pacific federation is not the LAC.

Verdict

The Asian century continues as a feasible economic description if China and India keep growing even while they quarrel — just as Europe’s century of power included Franco-German enmity. It does not continue as a feasible concert. Leadership of Asia will be contested. ASEAN will try to avoid choosing. India’s role becomes hinge of a multipolar Asia, not co-chair of a Beijing-friendly century. Feasible, then, with a changed meaning: Asia as the main theatre of world politics, not Asia as a team.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  AC[Asian century claim] --> G[China plus India growth]
  F[India-China friction] --> LAC[LAC Galwan Doklam]
  F --> BRI[BRI Indian Ocean]
  LAC --> B[Bipolar Asian security]
  G -.still possible.-> E[Economic shift]

Conclusion

India–China friction does not cancel Asian economic weight. It cancels the idea of a joint, peaceful Asian leadership. The Asian century remains feasible as a shift of wealth and attention. It is no longer feasible as a Sino-Indian partnership project.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia?

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2023 · Q5(b)). View answer →

  • Can trade save the Asian century?

    Trade keeps the economic shift alive. It has not produced a security community. That split is the answer.

  • Is Japan still part of the Asian century?

    Yes as capital and technology. Politically Japan is in the Quad, which is one reason the century is not China-led by default.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2023 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia?

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia?

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    Discuss the ways and means to realise greater economic co-operation among the Member States of South Asia.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    Discuss the steps required to realise hydro-co-operation between India and Bangladesh.

    View answer →

  5. 2022 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks

    What are the implications of 'Look-East' Policy on the north-eastern region of India?

    View answer →

  6. 2021 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

    Discuss the strategic implications of India's Look East Policy transforming into Act East Policy.

    View answer →

  7. 2021 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks

    Why South Asia is considered as the world's politically and economically least integrated region? Explain

    View answer →

  8. 2021 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks

    Relations between India and Russia are rooted in history, mutual trust and mutually beneficial cooperation. Discuss

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q5(d) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

Why do ethnic conflicts and insurgencies continue to remain major impediments to regional co-operation in South Asia?

India and South Asia

Insurgency and ethnic war in South Asia routinely cross borders. Sanctuary charges, refugees, and military alerts replace trade talks. SAARC and road-and-port plans stall on insecure stretches, including Afghanistan 2021 and Myanmar 2021. Domestic ethnic politics also block a regional “we.” Cooperation needs a security floor that these conflicts remove.

Q5(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks

What are the reasons for lack of 'regionness' in South Asia?

India and South Asia

Regionness is shared political identity plus working institutions. South Asia has a dominant India, a blocked India–Pakistan pair, and Chinese alternatives for smaller States. SAARC consensus cannot produce EU-style spillover. Security is a conflict complex, not a community. BIMSTEC is a work-around that still does not make a South Asian region.

Q7(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks

What are the implications of 'Look-East' Policy on the north-eastern region of India?

India and South Asia

Look East recast the north-east from a cul-de-sac to an ASEAN bridge. Kaladan, the IMT highway, and BIMSTEC are the hardware of that claim. Insurgency, drugs, and Myanmar’s coup are the security implications. Ecology and tribal land are the domestic social implications. Gains remain below promise until corridors actually run and stay safe.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.