Revision summary
Panchamrit is India’s five-point Glasgow offer. 500 GW non-fossil capacity and 50 per cent non-fossil installed electricity capacity by 2030 are power-system targets. They are not a 50 per cent share of total energy use. Intensity down 45 per cent from 2005, 1 billion tonnes off projected emissions, and net zero 2070 complete the set. Equity and finance claims sat beside the numbers.
Model answer
Introduction
At Glasgow in November 2021 India presented five nectar elements, Panchamrit, as its climate offer. They are capacity, intensity, an absolute cut in projected emissions, and a long net-zero date. They are not a pledge that half of all energy use will be renewable overnight.
Body
The five proposals
- Raise non-fossil electricity capacity to 500 GW by 2030.
- Meet 50 per cent of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil sources by 2030. This is a capacity share, not a claim that half of total energy consumption is already green.
- Reduce the emissions intensity of GDP by 45 per cent by 2030 from the 2005 level.
- Reduce projected carbon emissions by 1 billion tonnes in the decade to 2030.
- Achieve net-zero emissions by 2070.
How to read them
- The 50 per cent line is about the power system’s installed mix, mainly non-fossil generation capacity. It is not 50 per cent of the entire energy mix of oil, gas, biomass, and heat.
- 2070 is later than many OECD net-zero dates. India argued equity and remaining carbon space.
- The package updated earlier NDCs toward non-fossil capacity and a steeper intensity cut.
Diplomacy
- Panchamrit sat beside calls for climate finance and technology from historical emitters. Ambition was paired with CBDR.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Panchamrit COP-26] --> A[500 GW non-fossil] P --> B[50 percent installed capacity non-fossil] P --> C[45 percent intensity cut] P --> D[1 Gt projected cut] P --> E[Net zero 2070]
Conclusion
India’s COP-26 five points are 500 GW non-fossil, half of installed electricity capacity from non-fossil by 2030, a 45 per cent intensity cut from 2005, a 1 billion tonne reduction in projected emissions, and net zero in 2070. Wording them as “half the energy mix” is a factual error.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"The post-colonial state was thought of an entity that stood outside and above society as an autonomous agency." Explain
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q2). View answer →
-
Did India promise that half of all energy would be renewable by 2030?
No. The operational target is about non-fossil installed electricity capacity, plus 500 GW of such capacity.
-
What is the 1 billion tonne figure?
A cut in total projected carbon emissions by 2030, the fourth Panchamrit element, often cited with the intensity and capacity goals.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the major features of India's Foreign Policy in the 21st century. -
2022 · Q5(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Peaceful co-existence remains the cornerstone of India's foreign policy. Comment. -
2022 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine the major factors responsible for a turnaround in the trajectory of India's foreign policy in the post-cold war period -
2022 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 2 · 20 marks
How does India-Israel bilateral ties reflect the autonomy of India's foreign policy choices? -
2022 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss India's vision of a New World order in the 21st century -
2021 · Q5(b) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain the philosophical foundations of India's foreign policy. -
2021 · Q5(c) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Explain India's position on the waiver of intellectual property rights on COVID-19 vaccines in WTO. -
2021 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
How does the recent takeover of Afghanistan by Taliban impact India's strategic interests?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
Discuss the political economy approach to the comparative analysis of politics.
Comparative Politics
Political economy joins the study of power with the study of wealth. Marx and Wallerstein locate States in production and in a hierarchical world-economy. Almond’s functions describe roles; they do not explain ownership and dependence. Alavi’s overdeveloped State is a comparative PE thesis about post-colonial bureaucracy. The method compares markets, classes, and external ties, not only constitutions.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Political parties and pressure groups are sine qua non of democracy." Comment.
Politics of Representation and Participation
Schumpeterian democracy is a party contest for the vote. Almond split aggregation to parties and articulation to groups. Dahl’s polyarchy needs organised opposition, which parties supply. Groups carry specialised claims between elections. Mere organisation is not democracy; pluralism and contest are.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · PSIR GS 2 · 10 marks
"Marxist approach to the study of international relations has lost its relevance in the post-cold war era." Comment.
Approaches to the Study of International Relations
The USSR’s fall discredited State socialism, not every Marxist question. Waltzian polarity does not explain core–periphery production. Wallerstein and Cox remain usable after 1991. WTO, finance, and a capitalist China keep class and hierarchy on the agenda. Relevance is critique of order, not a second Soviet Union.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.