Revision summary
Peru’s mid-century development mixed export oligarchy with a radical military-planning interlude under Velasco, then crisis and neoliberal reversal. Indian early planning under the Planning Commission and the Mahalanobis strategy built public industry, technical education, and a durable idea of state-led structural change. India’s process was parliamentary and federally argued; Peru’s surge was corporatist and more easily dismantled. Critiques of the Hindu rate of growth and of controls do not cancel the foundational industrial and administrative capacity. The comparison shows that planning founds future development when institutions outlast a single regime, which India did more than Peru.
Model answer
Introduction
Peru and India both tried, in the mid-twentieth century, to use the state to break a primary-export trap and to industrialise. Peru’s path ran through an oligarchic export economy, a burst of military developmentalism under Juan Velasco Alvarado, and then a crisis that opened onto Fujimori’s neoliberal shock. India’s early planning under Nehru, Mahalanobis, and the Planning Commission was more durable, more democratic, and more foundational for the mixed economy that followed — including the later turn to markets.
Body
The Peruvian experience
Peru’s classic political economy was coastal export (guano, then sugar, cotton, minerals) and an Andean hinterland of incomplete agrarian citizenship. Civilian governments flirted with import-substitution and with a National Planning Institute. The decisive developmental surge was the Revolutionary Government of the Armed Forces (1968–75). Velasco nationalised oil and parts of mining, legislated agrarian reform against the coastal latifundia, and built state enterprises. Planning was nationalist and corporatist, closer to a military project of CEPAL-style structuralism than to a parliamentary five-year debate.
- The limits were severe: top-down reform, later debt, and 1990s dismantling. Peruvian planning is a discontinuous developmental state — interrupted ISI without a lasting democratic coalition.
Early Indian planning as foundation
India’s Planning Commission (1950) and the Second Plan’s Mahalanobis heavy-industry strategy built steel, machines, IITs, and a public-sector elite. Critics of controls and the Hindu rate of growth do not erase that industrial and food-policy base. Unlike Velasco’s Peru, Indian plans were debated in Parliament and the NDC. 1991 liberalised from a mixed economy, not from an export oligarchy alone.
The comparative lesson
Planning without democratic depth can be reversed in a decade. India’s early phase laid physical and institutional rails that later markets and welfare still use. The foundation was a sovereign developmental state that survived leadership change — Peru’s mirror of discontinuity.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD PE[Peru] --> V[Velasco ISI and land] V --> BR[Break / neoliberal shock] IN[India] --> PC[Planning Commission] PC --> MH[Mahalanobis industry] MH --> F[Foundation for 1991 and after]
Conclusion
Peru planned sharply under a military developmental regime and then unplanned under crisis and neoliberal shock. India planned early, imperfectly, and continuously enough to found an industrial and administrative base. The early Indian phase matters because later development, including the market turn, still stands on that base — a foundation Peru’s interrupted ISI did not equally leave.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Illustrate with examples how regional parties in India have played a crucial role in drawing the historically disadvantaged groups into the mainstream political system
Next question on this syllabus topic (2025 · Q8(c)). View answer →
-
Why compare India with Peru rather than with the USSR?
Because both were mixed, postcolonial or post-oligarchic economies using ISI and land reform, not Soviet command systems; the contrast is democratic continuity versus military interruption.
-
Did early Indian planning cause later growth?
It did not cause the 2000s boom by itself. It supplied steel, skills, public banks, and a national market on which later growth and welfare could be built.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the Philosophical approach to the study of Political theory -
2025 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Write a note on the relation between equality and liberty from the multi-cultural perspective -
2025 · Q1(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the Macpherson's view on power -
2025 · Q1(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Mention the difference between Italian and German brands of fascism -
2025 · Q2(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Karl Popper presents a defence of the open society against its enemies. Elaborate -
2025 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Provide a comparative analysis of behavioural and institutional approach to the study of Political theory -
2025 · Q3(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
"State ………. does the greatest harm to mankind by destroying individuality, which lies at the root of all progress." - Mahatma Gandhi. Elucidate -
2025 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain how the slogan 'the personal is political' addresses the issue of women's oppression and discrimination?
More from this topic
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Illustrate with examples how regional parties in India have played a crucial role in drawing the historically disadvantaged groups into the mainstream political system
Political Theory
Regional parties have been decisive vehicles for bringing historically disadvantaged groups into governing politics, not only into vote banks. The BSP made Dalit bahujan power executive in Uttar Pradesh; the DMK mainstreamed non-Brahmin and Tamil publics through Dravidian organisation and welfare. TMC incorporated rural poor, women, and minorities as the decisive Bengal coalition after the Left. TRS/BRS turned a backward region’s dignity claim into a state elite; AAP incorporated urban and agrarian users of public services; JMM brought Adivasi demands into Jharkhand’s party government. Jaffrelot’s silent revolution and Yadav’s democratic upsurges describe this incorporation, which creates new elites even as it opens the system.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
The decision to conduct Population Census-2027 has reopened the debate on consultation in India. Discuss its various aspects
Political Theory
Census 2027 is a political institution because it will affect delimitation, finance, and recognition after a delayed 2021 count. Federal consultation is required in spirit even though Census is a Union subject, especially for southern states that fear seat and fund losses. Caste enumeration and the NPR reopen debates on identity, privacy, and citizenship trust. Women’s parliamentary reservation is legally tied to post-census delimitation, so consultation on the formula is part of the census debate. A digital method needs consultation on exclusion and data security, or legibility will be mistaken for consent.
Q3(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain how the slogan 'the personal is political' addresses the issue of women's oppression and discrimination?
Political Theory
The slogan comes from second-wave feminism, famously associated with Carol Hanisch, and treats private injuries as effects of public power. Liberal theory’s public–private split hid unpaid work, domestic violence, and sexual subordination as personal matters. Millett, Pateman, and MacKinnon analysed patriarchy, the sexual contract, and male-standpoint law as political structures. Once named, those structures can be met by rights, statutes, and a thicker idea of citizenship, as Indian feminist legal struggles show. The slogan must still make room for intimacy, and for caste and class differences among women, or it becomes another false universal.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.