Revision summary
The political is not one object but a set of meanings used in political theory. Easton’s meaning is the authoritative allocation of values, illustrated by budgets, courts, and elections. Aristotle and Arendt treat the political as public speech and action among citizens, illustrated by assemblies and satyagraha. Marx, Schmitt, Dahl, and Gramsci treat it as organised power, conflict, decision, and hegemony. Feminist theory and movements such as anti-arrack show that the public–private boundary itself is a political question.
Model answer
Introduction
- The word political does not name one object. It names a family of meanings: the public allocation of values, the life of the polis, the contest for power, and the drawing of a line between public and private. To elucidate those meanings with illustrations is to show why students of political theory cannot treat the term as self-evident.
Body
Authoritative allocation
David Easton defined politics as the authoritative allocation of values for a society. A budget that funds a scheme and denies another, a court that upholds a right, and an election that authorises a cabinet are political in this sense. The illustration is ordinary government. What makes the act political is not passion but authority that binds.
The polis and public action
For Aristotle, the political is the life of the polis, where speech about justice is possible among citizens. Hannah Arendt recovered action and plurality: politics is appearing before others in a public space, not the household’s labour and not the craftsman’s making. Parliament, a Gram Sabha after the 73rd Amendment, and a satyagraha meeting are illustrations. A closed family decision is, on this map, not yet political.
Power, conflict, and the state
Realists and Marx treat the political as organised power and conflict. Carl Schmitt made the friend–enemy distinction the criterion of the political. War, party cleavage, and class struggle illustrate this darker sense. Dahl’s decisions and Gramsci’s hegemony both belong here: politics is who prevails and whose common sense rules.
Boundary work
Feminist theory, and Carole Pateman in particular, showed that calling the household pre-political hid male power. The slogan that the personal is political does not mean that every feeling is a statute. It means that marriage law, unpaid care, and domestic violence are already organised by public power. India’s anti-arrack movement in Andhra Pradesh illustrated that a ‘private’ liquor economy was a public injury to women.
Liberal theory still needs a public–private distinction so that conscience is not fully administered. The political, then, is also the activity of drawing that line: what the state may command, and what it may not.
A working set of meanings
- One may therefore say: the political is (i) authoritative allocation, (ii) civic public action, (iii) organised power and conflict, and (iv) the contest over the public–private boundary. Locke’s civil government, Rawls’s basic structure, and Habermas’s public sphere each emphasise a different member of this set. Illustrations should be matched to the meaning in use, or debate talks past itself.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD POL[Political] --> E[Easton allocation] POL --> A[Aristotle / Arendt public] POL --> P[Power and conflict] POL --> B[Public-private boundary] B --> F[Feminist illustration]
Conclusion
The term political means authoritative allocation, public civic action, organised power, and the drawing of the public–private line. Easton, Aristotle, Arendt, Marx, Schmitt, Dahl, Gramsci, and feminist theory name these senses. Clear writing states which meaning is in play and illustrates it, rather than treating political as a single undefined atmosphere.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Dharmashastra presents a duty-centric worldview for individuals and communities. Comment.
Next question on this syllabus topic (2024 · Q3(c)). View answer →
-
Is every social issue political?
On the feminist and Eastonian maps, an issue becomes political when it is bound by public authority or when the public–private line is itself contested. Not every private preference is a political act.
-
Why does Schmitt’s friend–enemy criterion matter?
It shows a meaning of the political as existential conflict. Liberal theory rejects making that the whole of politics, but it names a real limit case of power.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Explain the Philosophical approach to the study of Political theory -
2025 · Q3(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Provide a comparative analysis of behavioural and institutional approach to the study of Political theory -
2025 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain how the slogan 'the personal is political' addresses the issue of women's oppression and discrimination? -
2025 · Q4(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Do you think that legitimacy acquired by consent or manufactured by indoctrination is an essential element in maintenance of political rule? Justify your answer with relevant examples -
2025 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks
Delineate the key factors that have shaped the evolving political landscape in Jammu and Kashmir post 2019 -
2025 · Q7(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Enunciate the impediments to women's participation in local governance in the process of political decentralisation -
2025 · Q7(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
Caste remains a vital axis for political mobilisation in India. How would the caste census address the aspirations of people? Discuss -
2025 · Q8(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Illustrate with examples how regional parties in India have played a crucial role in drawing the historically disadvantaged groups into the mainstream political system
More from this topic
Q8(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
With reference to Peruvian experience of planning and economic development, examine how the early phase of economic planning in India has laid the foundation for future development
Political Theory
Peru’s mid-century development mixed export oligarchy with a radical military-planning interlude under Velasco, then crisis and neoliberal reversal. Indian early planning under the Planning Commission and the Mahalanobis strategy built public industry, technical education, and a durable idea of state-led structural change. India’s process was parliamentary and federally argued; Peru’s surge was corporatist and more easily dismantled. Critiques of the Hindu rate of growth and of controls do not cancel the foundational industrial and administrative capacity. The comparison shows that planning founds future development when institutions outlast a single regime, which India did more than Peru.
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks
The decision to conduct Population Census-2027 has reopened the debate on consultation in India. Discuss its various aspects
Political Theory
Census 2027 is a political institution because it will affect delimitation, finance, and recognition after a delayed 2021 count. Federal consultation is required in spirit even though Census is a Union subject, especially for southern states that fear seat and fund losses. Caste enumeration and the NPR reopen debates on identity, privacy, and citizenship trust. Women’s parliamentary reservation is legally tied to post-census delimitation, so consultation on the formula is part of the census debate. A digital method needs consultation on exclusion and data security, or legibility will be mistaken for consent.
Q8(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks
Illustrate with examples how regional parties in India have played a crucial role in drawing the historically disadvantaged groups into the mainstream political system
Political Theory
Regional parties have been decisive vehicles for bringing historically disadvantaged groups into governing politics, not only into vote banks. The BSP made Dalit bahujan power executive in Uttar Pradesh; the DMK mainstreamed non-Brahmin and Tamil publics through Dravidian organisation and welfare. TMC incorporated rural poor, women, and minorities as the decisive Bengal coalition after the Left. TRS/BRS turned a backward region’s dignity claim into a state elite; AAP incorporated urban and agrarian users of public services; JMM brought Adivasi demands into Jharkhand’s party government. Jaffrelot’s silent revolution and Yadav’s democratic upsurges describe this incorporation, which creates new elites even as it opens the system.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.