Q3(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks · 3 min read

← Q3(c) Q1(a) →

Examine the liberal theory of State in contemporary politics

Topic: Theories of the State. Syllabus: Theories of the State: Liberal, Neo-liberal, Marxist, Pluralist, Post-colonial and feminist. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2022 and Theories of the State.

Revision summary

The liberal state is limited public power justified by consent and rights. Locke and Mill set trust and liberty of thought; Rawls added fair opportunity and the difference principle. Hayek’s neo-liberal state is a market framework, not Rawls’s well-ordered society. India joins liberal limitation (Part III, Kesavananda) to social-revolution tasks (Part IV, Ambedkar). Contemporary politics tests liberalism with populist culture, Emergency memory, and market governmentality.

Model answer

Introduction

Liberal theory treats the state as a limited public power justified by consent, rights, and law. In contemporary politics that theory is split between a night-watchman reading, a rights-and-welfare reading, and a neo-liberal reading that tries to run the state like a market.

Body

Classical liberal state

  • Locke made the state a trust for life, liberty, and estate, with a right of revolution against tyranny.
  • J. S. Mill added representative government and liberty of thought, so that the state may not close discussion even for a majority.
  • Immanuel Kant supplied a republican legality of equal subjects under public law.
  • The state is necessary because inconvenience and conflict exist. It is dangerous because it holds the sword. Limitation is the liberal art.

Twentieth-century restatement

  • John Rawls rebuilt the liberal state as a well-ordered society: equal basic liberties, fair opportunity, and the difference principle.
  • That state is not minimal. It must keep the fair value of liberties, which needs education, a social minimum, and regulation of political money.
  • Isaiah Berlin’s negative liberty warned against a state that imposes a single positive ideal.
  • Robert Dahl’s polyarchy translated liberalism into inclusive contestation: opposition, association, and elections.

Neo-liberal and contemporary strain

  • Hayek and Friedman recast the liberal state as a framework for prices, with suspicion of planning and of trade unions.
  • After 1991, many states, including India, cut industrial licensing and opened trade, which looked like Hayek, while they also expanded rights laws, which looked like Rawls.
  • Foucault described neo-liberalism as a governmentality that produces competitive subjects, not only as a shrinking of the state.
  • Populist majorities now use the liberal ballot to press a cultural state, which tests Mill’s harm principle and minority rights.

Indian contemporary form

  • Part III, Articles 32 and 226, and Kesavananda Bharati (1973) are liberal limitation of the amending state.
  • Part IV, reservations, and Ambedkar’s social democracy pull the state beyond a night watchman toward egalitarian intervention.
  • The Emergency of 1975–77 showed how a formally liberal constitution can suspend the conditions of liberalism.
  • Judicial review, an independent election commission, and federal splits remain the working liberal theory of the Indian state.

Examination, not celebration

  • Liberal theory still best explains why contemporary constitutional states claim rights, regular elections, and legal responsibility of officials.
  • It is weaker on caste, capital, and colonial afterlives unless joined to Ambedkar, Gramsci, and political economy.
  • Communitarians say the liberal state abstracts too much from membership. Elitists say it overstates popular rule.
  • The contemporary liberal state is therefore a rights-bound, election-bound power that is asked to do more welfare than Locke wrote, and less cultural imposition than majorities sometimes want.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  L[Liberal state] --> LK[Locke trust]
  L --> RW[Rawls rights and difference]
  L --> HY[Hayek market framework]
  L --> IN[India Parts III-IV Kesavananda]

Conclusion

Liberal theory of the state remains consent, rights, and legal limits. Rawls and Dahl update it for welfare and polyarchy. Hayek narrows it to the market framework. In India, Parts III and IV and Kesavananda show a liberal state that is also a social-revolution state. Examination today is of that tension, not of a vanished night watchman.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Feminist critique of the State.

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2021 · Q1(a)). View answer →

  • Is a welfare state illiberal?

    Not in Rawls. It is illiberal if it destroys equal basic liberties or opposition. Capacity for welfare is not itself tyranny.

  • Is neo-liberalism the same as liberalism?

    No. Classical and egalitarian liberalism justify the state by rights and fairness. Neo-liberalism centres market coordination and competitive subjects.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q2(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks

    What is the Marxist and liberal approach towards the state? On what grounds the theoretical differences between them are premised? Explain

    View answer →

  2. 2024 · Q1(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

    Pluralist theory of State.

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q3(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks

    Eurocentrism is both the target and the motive force of the post-colonial political theory. Discuss

    View answer →

  4. 2021 · Q1(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

    Feminist critique of the State.

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q2(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks

What is the Marxist and liberal approach towards the state? On what grounds the theoretical differences between them are premised? Explain

Theories of the State

The liberal approach treats the state as limited public power justified by consent to protect rights, with law and separated offices as its form. Locke, Montesquieu, Mill, Rawls, and even Hayek share that the individual has claims the state must not devour. The Marxist approach treats the modern state as organised class power, from the Manifesto through Lenin’s smash-and-wither thesis. Gramsci and Poulantzas add hegemony and relative autonomy without dropping the class explanation. The theoretical difference rests on anthropology, property, history, and the meaning of emancipation, not only on liking or disliking a particular government.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

Pluralist theory of State.

Theories of the State

Pluralist theory treats the democratic state as an arena of competing organised groups rather than as a single-class or closed-elite machine. Bentley and Truman described politics as group process; Dahl called competitive democracy a polyarchy of multiple minorities. Resources of influence are dispersed, so who governs can vary by issue. Bachrach and Baratz, Lukes, Gramsci, and Lindblom show agenda control, manufactured wants, hegemony, and the privileged position of business. The theory explains open contest in polyarchies; it does not exhaust structural power.

Q3(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks

Eurocentrism is both the target and the motive force of the post-colonial political theory. Discuss

Theories of the State

Eurocentrism treats European political experience as the universal measure. Post-colonial theory attacks that measure through Said, Fanon, and Chatterjee, and through recovery of Gandhi, Aurobindo, and Ambedkar. The same theory is motivated by European problems of the state, nation, and rights that empire made inescapable. Chakrabarty’s formula is that Europe is indispensable and inadequate. The discussion is of that double relation, not of a simple rejection of all European thought.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.