Q7(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2022 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks · 3 min read

← Q5(d) Q8(a) →

Discuss the policy initiatives of the Fourteenth Finance Commission aimed towards promoting and strengthening agricultural development in India

Topic: Statutory Institutions/Commissions. Syllabus: Statutory Institutions/Commissions: Election Commission, CAG, Finance Commission, UPSC, NCSC, NCST, NCBC, National Human Rights Commission, National Commission for Women and National Commission for Minorities, NITI Aayog. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2022 and Statutory Institutions/Commissions.

Revision summary

The 14th FC’s farm-relevant policy was fiscal, not a crop mission. Devolution rose to 42 per cent so States could fund irrigation and agriculture with discretion. Panchayat grants support rural public goods linked to the 73rd Amendment. Forest-cover weight and disaster funds protect ecological and drought-related farm conditions. Tied CSS reduction was meant to let agro-climatic diversity shape spending. Outcomes depend on how States use the space.

Model answer

Introduction

The Fourteenth Finance Commission (2015–20), chaired by Y. V. Reddy, did not run farm schemes. It strengthened agriculture mainly by enlarging untied fiscal space for States, funding rural local bodies, and easing the grip of tied Centrally Sponsored Schemes on state farm policy.

Body

The fiscal core

  • Tax devolution to States rose from 32 per cent to 42 per cent of the divisible pool. Agriculture, irrigation, and rural roads are largely State and concurrent subjects in practice, so untied money is the Commission’s chief farm instrument.
  • The Commission argued that States know agro-climatic diversity better than a uniform Union scheme, which is a federal reading of Sarkaria’s cooperation.
  • It recommended a sharp reduction in the number of Centrally Sponsored Schemes and a higher state share of discretion, so that crop, irrigation, and extension mixes could differ by region.

Local bodies and the village farm economy

  • Large grants to gram panchayats and municipalities, with a basic grant plus a performance grant, were meant to build rural public goods that agriculture needs: water, sanitation, connectivity, and markets at the panchayat scale.
  • This links to the 73rd Amendment and Gram Swaraj: local identification of resources, not only a ministry line item.
  • Fourteenth Finance Commission grants were largely untied at the local level compared with many older scheme funds, which mattered for farm-related local works.

Risk, forest, and the farm environment

  • Horizontal devolution gave weight to forest cover, which compensates States that keep ecological services relevant to watersheds and rain-fed farming.
  • Disaster-relief arrangements under the Commission’s award support drought and flood response, which are agricultural shocks.
  • The Commission did not invent MSP or crop insurance. Those remained Union and State scheme choices funded from the larger devolved pool.

How far this is “agricultural policy”

  • Critics said 42 per cent devolution without matching farm conditionality could be spent on salaries, not on irrigation.
  • Supporters said conditionality was the old problem: agriculture failed partly because States could not set priorities.
  • GST, designed in the same decade, later squeezed some state commodity taxes; that is adjacent fiscal history, not a 14th FC farm scheme.
  • Compared with a Union agriculture ministry mission, the 14th FC’s initiative is constitutional fiscal federalism aimed at enabling farm development, not at planting a crop.

Assessment

  • The policy initiative is enabling, not directive. It can strengthen agriculture where States and panchayats choose to spend on water, extension, and rural infrastructure.
  • It cannot by itself correct market concentration or agrarian inequality that Harrington would call estates of power.
  • Success is therefore state-variable, which is consistent with the Commission’s own theory of subsidiarity.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  FC14[14th FC Reddy] --> DEV[42 percent devolution]
  FC14 --> PB[Panchayat grants]
  FC14 --> CSS[Fewer tied schemes]
  DEV --> AG[State farm irrigation spend]

Conclusion

The Fourteenth Finance Commission promoted agricultural development by raising untied state devolution to 42 per cent, funding panchayats, rewarding forest cover, and asking for fewer tied schemes. That is a federal enabling policy. It is not a substitute for state farm strategy or for land and market reform.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

    How far has been the National Human Rights Commission successful in achieving its objectives? Comment

    View answer →

  2. 2025 · Q7(c) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks

    There is a debate on the procedure for appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners to the Election Commission of India. Analyse its various aspects

    View answer →

  3. 2024 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks

    Explain the structure and functions of the National Commission for Women.

    View answer →

  4. 2023 · Q5(e) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

    National Commission for Minorities.

    View answer →

  5. 2023 · Q6(b) · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks

    How does NITI Aayog as a 'policy think tank with shared vision' visualize the reorganization of planning in India? Justify your answer

    View answer →

  6. 2022 · Q5(d) · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

    How far is the National Commission for Backward Classes an empowered body? Assess its role in the context of rising demand for backwardness among dominant communities.

    View answer →

  7. 2021 · Q8(a) · PSIR GS 1 · 20 marks

    "The success of electoral democracy can partly be attributed to the status and role of the Election Commission of India." Explain

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q7(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks

There is a debate on the procedure for appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners to the Election Commission of India. Analyse its various aspects

Statutory Institutions/Commissions

Article 324 left CEC and EC appointments to the President subject to a law Parliament long failed to make, so the Union executive decided in practice. Anoop Baranwal (2023) filled the gap with a committee of the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition, and the Chief Justice of India. The 2023 Act replaced the CJI with a Union Cabinet Minister, giving the executive two of three votes. The debate is about referee independence, separation of powers, and whether opposition participation is equal or ornamental. Procedure cannot guarantee a fair election, but a one-team selection committee makes impartiality harder to perform and to believe.

Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · PSIR GS 1 · 10 marks

How far has been the National Human Rights Commission successful in achieving its objectives? Comment

Statutory Institutions/Commissions

The NHRC is a statutory body under the 1993 Act, meant to watch public violations of human rights in the spirit of the Paris Principles. It has succeeded in recording custodial abuse, bonded labour, and other violations, and in issuing guidelines that travel with court doctrine. Its power is mainly recommendatory, and it often depends on the police it investigates. Vacancies, the 2019 composition changes, and weak reach over armed-forces and conflict-area cases are serious limits. It is a necessary lamp in Indian rights politics, not a substitute for courts, elections, or a reformed criminal state.

Q6(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · PSIR GS 1 · 15 marks

Explain the structure and functions of the National Commission for Women.

Statutory Institutions/Commissions

The National Commission for Women is a statutory body under the 1990 Act, constituted in 1992. Structure: a Chairperson, five members, and a Member-Secretary, with SC/ST representation among members, appointed by the Central Government. Functions include examining legal safeguards, investigating complaints, studying and promoting women’s rights, inspecting custodial institutions, advising on development planning, and supporting litigation. For inquiries it can use specified civil-court powers to summon and record evidence. It cannot replace courts or social movements; its limits are executive appointment and non-binding recommendations.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.