Is talking ethics in foreign policy naive?

Using ethics as a sermon while grabbing a river is naive. Using it as reciprocity and institutions is how interest lasts.

Must India ignore Chinese or Pakistani power because of ethics?

No. Defence remains. Ethics limits methods — civilians, prisoners, climate, and keeping one’s own word — not the right to exist.

At the international level, bilateral relations between most nations are

Revision summary

Open summary Close summary

Unrestrained national interest treats other nations as obstacles and produces spirals of distrust. Ethics does not erase self-defence; it sets reciprocity, kept promises, shared climate and civilian dignity as limits. Examples include the Paris climate pact, the Indus Waters Treaty, refugee protection, and vaccine sharing versus vaccine nationalism. Opaque debt and downstream river harm are interest without regard. Institutions and verification stop ethics from becoming naive surrender.

Model answer

Introduction

States are not saints. They seek security and advantage. Ethics does not abolish national interest. It asks that interest be pursued without treating another people as waste.

Body

The problem

Realist practice says a State may lie, squeeze a neighbour’s river, or dump carbon if it gains. That practice produces arms races, refugee crises and climate harm that return as costs.
“National interest without regard for others” is often a short-term factional interest wearing a flag: a contractor, a vote bank, or a general’s prestige.

How ethical consideration helps

Reciprocity: do not do to a neighbour’s civilians what you would call a crime if done to yours. This lowers spiral revenge.
Pacta sunt servanda: keep treaties. A broken water treaty or a broken border pact teaches the other side to arm.
Common goods: climate, pandemics, and oceans cannot be won as zero-sum loot. Ethics names the shared duty.
Human dignity: even in rivalry, prisoners of war, fishermen and students are not hostages of mood.
Justice in trade: dumping and beggar-thy-neighbour tariffs create the next political crisis. Fair rules are ethics with a calculator.
Truth in diplomacy: secret extra-territorial killing and fake maps may “work” for a season and poison trust for a generation.

Specific examples

Climate: the Paris Agreement, 2015 asks common but differentiated responsibility. Ethical consideration is why a high-emitting rich State cannot lecture a poor State while refusing finance. India’s solar push and demand for climate finance sit in this frame.
Water: the Indus Waters Treaty, 1960 survived wars because both sides treated a river as a shared life system, not only as a tap to punish. Threats to walk away raise ethical and strategic cost.
Refugees: the 1951 Refugee Convention spirit (India is not a party but still hosts) says a drowning neighbour is not only a security file. Pushbacks that dump people into the sea fail that ethic and create lasting hate.
COVID-19: vaccine nationalism and delayed COVAX supply showed interest without regard. Vaccine Maitri, when it was real supply and not only a headline, was the ethical counter-example — and it also built goodwill, which is interest rightly understood.
Development partnerships versus debt traps: opaque loans that seize a port when unpaid are interest without regard. Transparent, demand-driven lines of credit are closer to justice.
Humanitarian corridors in a war, and the Chemical Weapons Convention, show that even enemies can agree that some harms are not tools.
River-linking or damming that ignores a downstream country’s farmers is the environmental-ethics problem at the border. Joint basin institutions are the ethical instrument.

Limits

Ethics is not appeasement of aggression. Self-defence remains a right. The point is that how you defend still has a ceiling: no targeting of markets as a method, no collective punishment of a minority across the fence.
A State that is ethical alone while others cheat can be exploited. Hence institutions, verification and a public that will not cheer a cheap cruelty.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  NI[Narrow national interest] --> TEN[Conflict and tension]
  ETH[Ethical consideration] --> REC[Reciprocity treaties common goods dignity]
  REC --> RES[Lower tension and durable interest]
  TEN --> RES

Conclusion

National interest is not cancelled by ethics. It is civilised by reciprocity, kept treaties, shared climate and the refusal to treat another people as instruments. Paris, Indus, vaccines and basin talks are examples. Cruelty that looks clever usually returns as tension.

Quick related

Students also ask

Is talking ethics in foreign policy naive?

Using ethics as a sermon while grabbing a river is naive. Using it as reciprocity and institutions is how interest lasts.
Must India ignore Chinese or Pakistani power because of ethics?

No. Defence remains. Ethics limits methods — civilians, prisoners, climate, and keeping one’s own word — not the right to exist.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

More from this topic

Q5 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 10 marks

(a) "One who is devoted to one's duty attains highest perfection in life." Analyse this statement with reference to sense of responsibility and personal fulfilment as a civil servant. (b) To achieve holistic development goal, a civil servant acts as an enabler and active facilitator of growth rather than a regulator. What specific measures will you suggest to achieve this goal?

Ethics and Human Interface

Devotion to lawful duty, owned outcomes and competence together make a civil servant’s ‘perfection’. Fulfilment is public trust, not a bribe or a trend. Blind obedience to an illegal order is not duty. As an enabler the officer uses single windows, SLAs, risk-based inspection and open data. The officer still forbids harm; facilitation must not become capture for a nephew or a donor.

View answer → Download PDF

Q4 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS IV · 10 marks

(a) "For any kind of social re-engineering by successfully implementing welfare schemes, a civil servant must use reason and critical thinking in an ethical framework." Justify this statement with suitable examples. (b) What are the major teachings of Mahavir? Explain their relevance in the contemporary world.

Ethics and Human Interface

Social re-engineering through welfare needs hard thinking about targeting and exclusion, inside a frame of dignity. Portal worship without a humane override can starve a rights-holder. Mahavira taught ahimsa, satya, aparigraha and anekantavada — non-violence, truth, non-possessiveness and many-sidedness. Those ideas check hate speech, corruption, ecological harm and one-sided files. Examples from PDS, MGNREGA and forest housing show the mix of reason and ethics.

View answer → Download PDF

Q4(b) · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS IV · 10 marks

"Mindless addiction to Form, ignoring the Substance of the matter, results in rendering of injustice. A perceptive civil servant is one who ignores such literalness and carries out true intent." Examine the above statement with suitable illustrations.

Ethics and Human Interface

What counted as just can become unjust when facts, rights and harm are seen more clearly, as in sexuality, talaq, sedition and biometric exclusion. Scrutiny by courts, audits and honest officers is what stops both frozen custom and cynical ‘everyone did it’. Addiction to form turns a stamp into a wall against a widow; substance is the purpose of the statute. A perceptive civil servant uses lawful discretion and a speaking record to carry intent, not to gift a nephew a waiver. Equity without jurisdiction is another injustice.

View answer → Download PDF

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.