Q17 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · GS III · 12 marks · 3 min read

← Q16 Q18 →

The terms 'Hot Pursuit' and 'Surgical Strikes' are often used in connection with armed action against terrorist attacks. Discuss the strategic impact of such actions.

Topic: Internal Security and Extremism. Syllabus: Linkages between development and spread of extremism. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Internal Security and Extremism.

Revision summary

Hot pursuit is an immediate chase across a boundary; a surgical strike is a limited, precise hit on a camp. India’s Myanmar 2015 and LoC 2016 actions are the living examples in this debate. Gains are deterrence, morale, and a signal to sponsors. Risks are escalation, civilian harm, and a rebuilt sanctuary. The tool works only with narrow aims, evidence, and follow-on diplomacy, not as a substitute for police and intelligence.

Model answer

Introduction

Hot pursuit is a fast chase of attackers across a boundary before they melt into a safe haven. A surgical strike is a short, planned hit on a specific camp or launch pad, then a return, meant to be limited and deniable or at least contained. India used the first language after the 2015 Myanmar operation against militants, and the second after the September 2016 strikes across the Line of Control following the Uri attack. The strategic question is what these acts do to deterrence and to the next war, not only to tonight’s headline.

Body

What the terms mean in practice

  • Hot pursuit stresses immediacy and continuity of the chase; it is borrowed from maritime law but used loosely on land.
  • A surgical strike stresses precision, limited aims, and a political message: the State can reach the camp, not only absorb the blast.
  • Both are below a full conventional war and are aimed at non-State groups that use another territory. In South Asia they still touch a nuclear-armed rival or a sensitive neighbour.

Strategic impact — gains

  • Deterrence by punishment: a group and its handlers cannot assume that Indian soil is a free firing point. After Uri, the public and the force needed a visible reply; silence can also be read as weakness.
  • Initiative: the security forces set time and place instead of only patrolling for the next fidayeen.
  • Domestic cohesion and morale of troops who have taken casualties; that is a real strategic resource in a long counter-terror campaign.
  • Signalling to sponsors: plausible deniability of camps becomes costlier if India is willing to cross a line on a narrow aim.
  • International narrative: if evidence of the terror attack is shared, a limited strike can be framed as self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter, rather than as aggression — though others will contest the facts.

Strategic impact — risks and limits

  • Escalation ladder: the other State may reply on the Line of Control, in Kashmir, or with a larger conventional move. Nuclear overhang makes misreading deadly.
  • Sanctuary adaptation: camps thin out, move deeper, or hide among civilians; one raid does not end the industry of terror.
  • Neighbour sovereignty: hot pursuit into a friendly or fragile State (as in the Myanmar debate) can strain diplomacy even when that State also wants the militants gone.
  • Legal and reputational cost if civilians die or if the operation cannot be distinguished from a raid on regular troops.
  • Tit-for-tat on Indian soil: terror groups may seek a bigger spectacular to restore their brand after a strike.
  • Alliance and great-power reaction: partners may privately approve and publicly urge restraint; that mixed signal must be planned for.

Using them as strategy, not as theatre

  • Pair the strike with diplomacy, FATF-type financial pressure, and intelligence so the camp is not rebuilt in a month.
  • Keep aims narrow and communication controlled so the other side has a ladder down.
  • Strengthen border and police so the next module cannot be launched while the television debate still runs.
  • Do not treat every local ambush as a case for crossing; threshold and evidence protect the tool from inflation.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  ATT[Terror attack] --> OPT[Hot pursuit or surgical strike]
  OPT --> DET[Deterrence morale initiative]
  OPT --> ESC[Escalation and sanctuary shift]
  DIP[Diplomacy intelligence finance] --> DET
  ESC --> RISK[Nuclear and diplomatic cost]

Conclusion

Hot pursuit and surgical strikes can restore deterrence, morale, and a measure of initiative after a terrorist attack. They also climb an escalation ladder beside a nuclear neighbour and can scatter rather than finish a group. Their strategic value holds when aims stay limited, law and evidence are prepared, and diplomacy and intelligence continue after the troops are home.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • 'Terrorism is emerging as a competitive industry over the last few decades." Analyse the above statement.

    Next question in the 2016 paper (Q18). View answer →

  • Do surgical strikes end terrorism?

    No. They can raise the cost of a particular camp and restore deterrence. Recruitment, money, and ideology still need police, politics, and finance measures.

  • Is hot pursuit always legal?

    Not automatically. Another State’s sovereignty is involved. Legality depends on consent, self-defence facts, necessity, and proportionality — all of which will be disputed.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q10 · GS III · 10 marks

    The Government of India recently stated that Left Wing Extremism (LWE) will be eliminated by 2026. What do you understand by LWE and how are the people affected by it? What measures have been taken by the government to eliminate LWE?

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q19 · GS III · 15 marks

    What are the internal security challenges being faced by India? Give out the role of Central Intelligence and Investigative Agencies tasked to counter such threats.

    View answer →

  3. 2023 · Q20 · GS III · 15 marks

    Give out the major sources of terror funding in India and efforts being made to curtail these sources. In the light of this, also discuss the aim and objective of the ' No Money for Terror [NMFT]' Conference recently held at New Delhi in November 2022.

    View answer →

  4. 2022 · Q20 · GS III · 15 marks

    Naxalism is a social, economic and developmental issue manifesting as a violent internal security threat. In this context, discuss the emerging issues gest a multilayered strategy to tackle the menace of Naxalism.

    View answer →

  5. 2019 · Q9 · GS III · 10 marks

    The banning of 'Jammat-e-Islami' in Jammu and Kashmir brought into focus the role of over-ground workers (OGWs) in assisting terrorist organizations. Examine the role played by OGWs in assisting terrorist organizations in insurgency affected areas. Discuss measures to neutralize influence of OGWs.

    View answer →

  6. 2018 · Q10 · GS III · 10 marks

    Left Wing Extremism (LWE) is showing a downward trend, but still affects many parts of the country. Briefly explain the Government of India's approach to counter the challenges posed by LWE. (150 Words, 10 Marks).

    View answer →

  7. 2017 · Q10 · GS III · 10 marks

    The north-eastern region of India has been infested with insurgency for a very long time. Analyze the major reasons for the survival of armed insurgency in this region.

    View answer →

  8. 2015 · Q19 · GS III · 12 marks

    The persisting drives of the government for development of large industries in backward areas have resulted in isolating the tribal population and the farmers who face multiple displacements. With Malkangiri and Naxalbari foci, discuss the corrective strategies needed to win the Left Wing Extremism (LWE) doctrine affected citizens back into mainstream of social and economic growth.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS III · 12 marks

How globalization has led to the reduction of employment in the formal sector of the Indian economy? Is increased informalization detrimental to the development of the country?

Indian Economy

After 1991, trade opening, flexible staffing and capital-intensive technology cut regular factory hiring. Services-led growth and a freeze on public recruitment added few mass formal jobs. Informal work absorbed labour but kept wages, social security and productivity low. A large informal sector also limits tax and social-insurance reach. Development needs formalisation of growing firms, not permanent dualism.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS III · 12 marks

Women empowerment in India needs gender budgeting. What are the requirements and status of gender budgeting in the Indian context?

Government Budgeting

Gender budgeting tags and tracks public money so women actually benefit from general and specific schemes. Requirements are sex-disaggregated data, a Gender Budget Statement, trained cells, outcome targets and audit. India began a Union Gender Budget Statement in 2005-06; States have followed unevenly. Part B allocations are often notional and beneficiary data remain weak. Empowerment will follow when outcomes, not only rupee annexes, are audited.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS III · 12 marks

Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) is necessary for bringing unbanked to the institutional finance fold. Do you agree with this for financial inclusion of the poor section of the Indian society? Give arguments to justify your opinion.

Indian Economy

PMJDY (2014) gives a zero-balance account, RuPay card, overdraft and basic insurance to the unbanked. It is necessary because Direct Benefit Transfer and later credit need a bank identity. It helps the poor by cutting leakage and offering a cheaper alternative to informal lenders. Dormant accounts and weak last-mile cash-out remain the main gaps. Inclusion is complete only when the account is used and credit and insurance actually work.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.