Revision summary
Gender budgeting tags and tracks public money so women actually benefit from general and specific schemes. Requirements are sex-disaggregated data, a Gender Budget Statement, trained cells, outcome targets and audit. India began a Union Gender Budget Statement in 2005-06; States have followed unevenly. Part B allocations are often notional and beneficiary data remain weak. Empowerment will follow when outcomes, not only rupee annexes, are audited.
Model answer
Introduction
Gender budgeting is not a separate purse for women. It is a way of planning, spending and auditing the Union and State budgets so that policies close gaps in work, health, safety and assets. Women's empowerment needs this tool because a gender-blind budget can look large on paper and still miss girls' schools, maternity beds, childcare and land titles.
Body
Why empowerment needs gender budgeting
- Women face unequal unpaid care, weaker asset rights and labour-market barriers. Ordinary line ministries will not correct these unless money is tagged and tracked.
- Schemes for roads, power, skills and farming affect women differently; gender budgeting forces each department to ask who benefits.
- Legal rights (equal pay, maternity, protection from violence) stay hollow without budgeted staff, shelters and courts.
- Empowerment is also voice in fiscal choice: a Gender Budget Statement makes the claim visible to Parliament and the public.
Requirements
- Sex-disaggregated data on beneficiaries, wages, land, credit, health and crime, so allocations are not guesswork.
- A published Gender Budget Statement that splits spending into women-specific schemes (Part A) and pro-women shares of general schemes (Part B).
- Gender cells in ministries and States, with trained budget officers, not a one-time annex.
- Outcome targets: enrolment, institutional deliveries, women's labour-force participation, credit to women, and conviction in violence cases — not only rupee outlays.
- Audit and mid-year correction by the Comptroller and Auditor General and parliamentary committees so the statement is not a brochure.
- Coordination with Beti Bachao Beti Padhao, maternity schemes, National Rural Livelihoods Mission self-help groups, and the Nirbhaya fund so gender lines talk to each other.
Status in India
- India introduced a Gender Budget Statement (Statement 20) with the Union Budget 2005-06, after a 2004-05 pilot in a few departments.
- The Ministry of Women and Child Development is the nodal ministry; many Union ministries now report Part A and Part B figures.
- Several States (Karnataka, Kerala, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and others) adopted State gender budgets, with uneven depth.
- Gaps remain: Part B shares are often notional, data on actual women beneficiaries are thin, and large infrastructure votes are weakly gendered.
- Women's share of formal credit, land titles and regular public employment still lags, which shows that a statement is not yet a full gender-responsive budget cycle.
- Recent Union efforts (Sukanya Samriddhi, maternity benefit, Ujjwala in 2016, stand-up loans for women) sit beside the statement but still need outcome audit.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD E[Women empowerment] --> B[Gender budgeting] B --> D[Sex disaggregated data] B --> S[Gender Budget Statement] B --> O[Outcome targets] B --> A[Audit] S --> U[Union 2005-06] O --> G[Real gap closure]
Conclusion
Women's empowerment needs gender budgeting because money, not only law, decides whether rights reach the household. India has the statement, the nodal ministry and many State pilots. The next step is reliable sex-wise data, honest Part B shares, and audit of outcomes, not only of annexes.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) is necessary for bringing unbanked to the institutional finance fold. Do you agree with this for financial inclusion of the poor section of the Indian society? Give arguments to justify your opinion.
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Is gender budgeting a separate budget only for women?
No. It is a method of analysing the whole budget so general spending also closes gender gaps.
-
Has India completed gender budgeting?
No. The statement exists, but data quality, Part B honesty and outcome audit are still incomplete.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q11 · GS III · 15 marks
Explain how the Fiscal Health Index (FHI) can be used as a tool for assessing the fiscal performance of states in India. In what way would it encourage the states to adopt prudent and sustainable fiscal policies? -
2021 · Q2 · GS III · 10 marks
Distinguish between Capital Budget and Revenue Budget. Explain the components of both these Budgets. -
2020 · Q12 · GS III · 15 marks
Explain the rationale behind the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act of 2017. How has COVID-19 impacted the GST compensation fund and created new federal tensions? -
2019 · Q1 · GS III · 10 marks
Enumerate the indirect taxes which have been subsumed in the goods and services tax (GST) in India. Also, comment on the revenue implications of the GST introduced in India since July 2017. -
2019 · Q12 · GS III · 15 marks
The public expenditure management is a challenge to the Government of India in context of budget making during the post liberalization period. Clarify it. -
2018 · Q2 · GS III · 10 marks
Comment on the important changes introduced in respect of the Long term Capital Gains Tax (LCGT) and Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) in the Union Budget for 2018-2019. (150 Words, 10 Marks). -
2017 · Q11 · GS III · 15 marks
One of the intended objectives of Union Budget 2017-18 is to 'transform, energize and clean India'. Analyse the measures proposed in the Budget 2017-18 to achieve the objective.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS III · 12 marks
How globalization has led to the reduction of employment in the formal sector of the Indian economy? Is increased informalization detrimental to the development of the country?
Indian Economy
After 1991, trade opening, flexible staffing and capital-intensive technology cut regular factory hiring. Services-led growth and a freeze on public recruitment added few mass formal jobs. Informal work absorbed labour but kept wages, social security and productivity low. A large informal sector also limits tax and social-insurance reach. Development needs formalisation of growing firms, not permanent dualism.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS III · 12 marks
Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) is necessary for bringing unbanked to the institutional finance fold. Do you agree with this for financial inclusion of the poor section of the Indian society? Give arguments to justify your opinion.
Indian Economy
PMJDY (2014) gives a zero-balance account, RuPay card, overdraft and basic insurance to the unbanked. It is necessary because Direct Benefit Transfer and later credit need a bank identity. It helps the poor by cutting leakage and offering a cheaper alternative to informal lenders. Dormant accounts and weak last-mile cash-out remain the main gaps. Inclusion is complete only when the account is used and credit and insurance actually work.
Q4 · UPSC Mains 2016 · GS III · 12 marks
What are 'Smart Cities'? Examine their relevance for urban development in India. Will it increase rural-urban differences? Give arguments for 'Smart Villages' in the light of PURA and RURBAN Mission.
Indian Economy
Indian Smart Cities combine area-based works and pan-city ICT for water, mobility, housing and e-governance. They are relevant because cities are congested, under-serviced and economically central. If capital stays in 100 cities, rural-urban differences will widen. PURA sought urban amenities in rural clusters through four connectivities. The 2016 Rurban Mission is the present cluster vehicle for Smart Villages alongside city Missions.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.