Revision summary
India’s gold demand is met largely by imports, which widen the current account deficit and can weaken the rupee. Most domestic gold sits idle as jewellery rather than as a financial asset. Gold Monetisation Scheme 2015 pays interest on deposited gold and can supply jewellers from that stock. It replaces the older Gold Deposit Scheme and sits with Sovereign Gold Bonds and the Indian Gold Coin. Trust in assay and cultural preference for jewellery will decide actual deposits.
Model answer
Introduction
Households and temples in India hold a huge stock of gold as jewellery and bars. When prices or festivals rise, imports surge. That gold is largely unproductive: it sits in lockers while the current account deficit and the rupee take the hit. The Gold Monetisation Scheme (November 2015) tries to pull idle metal into banks and refiners.
Body
Why gold imports hurt the external account
- India is among the world’s largest gold importers; the metal is a big line in the merchandise import bill after oil.
- The 2013 taper-tantrum period showed how gold imports can widen the current account deficit and pressure the rupee.
- Policy already used import duty, the 80: 20 export-import rule, and curbs on credit for gold — which treat the symptom, not the stock in homes.
- If even a fraction of domestic gold is monetised, import demand for the same jewellery and industrial use can fall.
Merits of the Gold Monetisation Scheme
- Depositors can tender gold to banks; after assay, they earn interest on the metal and may take back gold or rupees at maturity (short, medium and long tenors).
- Medium- and long-term deposits can be on-lent to jewellers and refiners, so the gems and jewellery industry uses domestic metal instead of fresh imports.
- The scheme replaces the weakly used Gold Deposit Scheme (1999) with clearer interest, tax treatment and a role for refiners and collection centres.
- Fiscal and external merit: lower import volume eases the current account and supports the rupee, without asking households to sell family gold forever.
- Temples and institutions with large holdings can earn a return instead of paying locker and security costs.
- Complementary Sovereign Gold Bond and Indian Gold Coin (2015) give paper or official coin substitutes so future demand need not all be imported bars.
Limits
- Cultural attachment to karat jewellery, distrust of assay, and low interest versus making charges will slow deposits.
- Branch and refinery infrastructure must be trusted or the scheme stays a press note.
- Monetisation does not by itself end festival demand; it only recycles existing metal.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD H[Household temple gold] --> I[Fresh imports] I --> B[CAD and rupee pressure] H --> G[Gold Monetisation Scheme] G --> R[Interest and refiner supply] R --> C[Lower import need]
Conclusion
Gold imports have repeatedly strained India’s balance of payments and the rupee because idle household metal is preferred to bank returns. The Gold Monetisation Scheme’s merit is to pay interest, feed jewellers from domestic stock, and cut the import bill. It will work only with trusted assay, fair interest and the bond-and-coin substitutes that absorb new demand.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"Success of make in India program depends on the success of Skill India programme and radical labour reforms." Discuss with logical arguments.
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Does the depositor lose the family gold forever?
No. The scheme is a deposit. Gold or rupee redemption depends on the tenor chosen; interest is the extra return.
-
Why not only raise import duty?
Duty curbs new bars but does not use the metal already in India, and it can push smuggling. Monetisation attacks the idle stock.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2015 · Q1 · GS III · 12 marks
The nature of economic growth in India in recent times is often described as a jobless growth. Do you agree with this view? Give arguments in favour of your answer. -
2015 · Q2 · GS III · 12 marks
Livestock rearing has a big potential for providing non- farm employment and income in rural areas. Discuss suggesting suitable measures to promote this sector in India. -
2015 · Q8 · GS III · 12 marks
"Success of make in India program depends on the success of Skill India programme and radical labour reforms." Discuss with logical arguments. -
2015 · Q10 · GS III · 12 marks
There is a clear acknowledgement that Special Economic Zones (SEZs) are a tool of industrial development, manufacturing and exports. Recognising this potential, the whole instrumentality of SEZs require augmentation. Discuss the issue plaguing the success of SEZs with respect to taxation, governing laws and administration. -
2015 · Q11 · GS III · 12 marks
What do you understand by "Standard Positioning System" and "Precision positioning system" in the GPS era? Discuss the advantage India perceives from its ambitious IRNSS programme employing just seven satellites. -
2015 · Q12 · GS III · 12 marks
What are the areas of prohibitive labour that can be sustainably managed by robots? Discuss the initiatives that can propel the research in premier research institutes for substantive and gainful innovation. -
2015 · Q13 · GS III · 12 marks
Discuss the advantage and security implication of cloud hosting of servers vis-a-vis in house machine based hosting for government business. -
2015 · Q14 · GS III · 12 marks
India's Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) which has a database containing formatted information on more than 2 million medicinal formulations is proving a powerful weapon in country's fight against erroneous patents. Discuss the pro and cons of making the database available publicly available under open source licensing.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS III · 12 marks
The nature of economic growth in India in recent times is often described as a jobless growth. Do you agree with this view? Give arguments in favour of your answer.
Indian Economy
Jobless growth means GDP rises much faster than decent employment. NSSO-era data showed weak employment elasticity in the 2000s despite high output growth. Organised manufacturing stayed thin; services and capital-intensive industry added value with few regular jobs. Construction and informal work absorbed some labour, so the claim is about quality more than a literal zero. A job-rich path needs labour-intensive factories, skills and easier formal hiring.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS III · 12 marks
Livestock rearing has a big potential for providing non- farm employment and income in rural areas. Discuss suggesting suitable measures to promote this sector in India.
Indian Economy
Livestock gives year-round cash, especially to small and land-poor rural households. Dairy cooperatives and NDDB already proved a scalable non-farm income model. National Livestock Mission, Rashtriya Gokul Mission and the National Dairy Plan are the present Union tools. Feed, vaccination, insurance and milk-meat markets decide whether animals actually raise income. Women and landless workers gain most from backyard poultry, goats and dairy if extension reaches them.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS III · 12 marks
In the view of the declining average size of land holdings in India which has made agriculture non - viable for a majority of farmers should contract farming and land leasing be promoted in agriculture? critically evaluate the pros and cons.
Crops, Irrigation and Marketing
Average holdings near 1.15 hectares make many farms too small to cover cost and risk. Contract farming can bring price, seed and offtake, as the Model APMC Act 2003 envisaged. Unequal bargaining, quality rejection and monoculture are the main contract risks. Legal leasing can assemble scale and open credit while the owner keeps title; informal tenancy already exists. Both tools need written terms, FPOs and clean records, not a free hand for sponsors.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.