Revision summary
Average holdings near 1.15 hectares make many farms too small to cover cost and risk. Contract farming can bring price, seed and offtake, as the Model APMC Act 2003 envisaged. Unequal bargaining, quality rejection and monoculture are the main contract risks. Legal leasing can assemble scale and open credit while the owner keeps title; informal tenancy already exists. Both tools need written terms, FPOs and clean records, not a free hand for sponsors.
Model answer
Introduction
The Agriculture Census shows the average operational holding in India is now around 1.15 hectares, and a majority of farmers are marginal. A plot that small cannot always feed a family or repay a machine loan. Contract farming and land leasing are two ways to restore scale without forcing sale of title. Both help only if the weak party is protected.
Body
Why holdings have become non-viable
- Inheritance splits land; ceiling and tenancy fears also keep plots fragmented and unrecorded.
- A tiny plot cannot use a tube well, harvester or warehouse efficiently, so unit cost stays high.
- Marketable surplus is small, so the farmer sells in distress and stays out of institutional credit.
- Leaving land idle while the owner works in a city wastes soil that a tenant could crop — if the law allowed a clean lease.
Contract farming: pros and cons
- Pros: a written offtake and price, seed and extension from the sponsor, and a door into processing and export that the village trader does not offer.
- The Model APMC Act, 2003 already asked States to allow contract farming outside the old mandi monopoly.
- Cons: the sponsor sets quality specs and can reject produce; bargaining power is unequal; water and soil can be mined for a single crop; and dispute forums are far from the village.
- Without Farmer Producer Organisations aggregating small plots, the contract is often with a middleman, not the tiller.
Land leasing: pros and cons
- Pros: a legal lease lets a skilled tiller assemble a viable unit; the owner keeps title and can work off-farm; the tenant can then show the lease for credit and insurance.
- Informal tenancy is already widespread; hiding it hurts the actual cultivator.
- Cons: poorly designed law can enable reverse tenancy and pressure on poor owners; some States still fear that tenants will claim occupancy rights, so owners leave land fallow instead.
- Land records must name the cultivator without threatening the owner’s title.
Critical balance
- Promote both, with model contracts, price and quality transparency, State dispute cells, and a liberal, recorded lease that is time-bound and does not transfer ownership.
- Do not treat them as a substitute for public irrigation, extension and MSP where it actually operates.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD H[Tiny holdings] --> N[Non viable farms] N --> C[Contract farming offtake] N --> L[Legal land leasing scale] C --> S[Safeguards FPO disputes] L --> S S --> V[Viable tiller keeps title]
Conclusion
Tiny holdings have made many farms non-viable. Contract farming and legal leasing can restore scale and offtake if contracts are fair and leases are recorded without stealing title. Unregulated contracts and hidden tenancy will only shift risk onto the small farmer.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How can the Digital India program help farmers to improve farm productivity and income? What step has the government taken in this regard?
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Does contract farming take away the farmer’s land?
No. It is an offtake contract. The risk is unfair price and rejection, not automatic loss of title.
-
Why do owners fear legal leasing?
Because older tenancy laws in some States let long tenants claim occupancy. A time-bound lease that protects title is the answer.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2017 · Q4 · GS III · 10 marks
Explain various types of revolutions, took place in Agriculture after Independence in India. How these revolutions have helped in poverty alleviation and food security in India? -
2017 · Q5 · GS III · 10 marks
What are the reasons for poor acceptance of cost effective small processing unit? How the food processing unit will be helpful to uplift the socio-economic status of poor farmers? -
2017 · Q14 · GS III · 15 marks
What are the major reasons for declining rice and wheat yield in the cropping system? How crop diversification is helpful to stabilize the yield of the crop in the system? -
2017 · Q15 · GS III · 15 marks
How do subsidies affect the cropping pattern, crop diversity and economy of farmers? What is the significance of crop insurance, minimum support price and food processing for small and marginal farmers? -
2016 · Q7 · GS III · 12 marks
What is water-use efficiency? Describe the role of micro-irrigation in increasing the water-use efficiency. -
2016 · Q8 · GS III · 12 marks
What is allelopathy? Discuss its role in major cropping systems of irrigated agriculture. -
2016 · Q10 · GS III · 12 marks
Given the vulnerability of Indian agriculture to vagaries of nature, discuss the need for crop insurance and bring out the salient features of the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY). -
2015 · Q4 · GS III · 12 marks
How can the Digital India program help farmers to improve farm productivity and income? What step has the government taken in this regard?
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS III · 12 marks
The nature of economic growth in India in recent times is often described as a jobless growth. Do you agree with this view? Give arguments in favour of your answer.
Indian Economy
Jobless growth means GDP rises much faster than decent employment. NSSO-era data showed weak employment elasticity in the 2000s despite high output growth. Organised manufacturing stayed thin; services and capital-intensive industry added value with few regular jobs. Construction and informal work absorbed some labour, so the claim is about quality more than a literal zero. A job-rich path needs labour-intensive factories, skills and easier formal hiring.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS III · 12 marks
Livestock rearing has a big potential for providing non- farm employment and income in rural areas. Discuss suggesting suitable measures to promote this sector in India.
Indian Economy
Livestock gives year-round cash, especially to small and land-poor rural households. Dairy cooperatives and NDDB already proved a scalable non-farm income model. National Livestock Mission, Rashtriya Gokul Mission and the National Dairy Plan are the present Union tools. Feed, vaccination, insurance and milk-meat markets decide whether animals actually raise income. Women and landless workers gain most from backyard poultry, goats and dairy if extension reaches them.
Q4 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS III · 12 marks
How can the Digital India program help farmers to improve farm productivity and income? What step has the government taken in this regard?
Crops, Irrigation and Marketing
Digital India (1 July 2015) is the public digital stack for broadband, identity and e-services. Farmers can use it for weather, soil advice, credit identity and market prices. Soil Health Card, mKisan, Kisan Call Centre 1551, AGMARKNET and NeGP-A are the agri tools already in play. DILRMP land records, Aadhaar and CSCs support credit, subsidy and applications. Last-mile connectivity and mandi rules still decide whether the portal becomes income.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.