Revision summary
The Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee was born of Resolution 1373 to monitor the global counter-terror legal order. The Executive Directorate, the 1267 ISIL/Al-Qaida sanctions, and Resolution 1540 form the associated cluster. Gains: binding duties, listings, capacity visits, aviation and finance norms. Limits: no common definition, permanent-member naming politics, rights abuse, new financing tech, no army. The Financial Action Task Force is separate and often hurts more than a Committee letter. The machine is a floor of laws, not a cure for a divided Council.
Model answer
Introduction
After 11 September 2001 the Security Council used Chapter VII to tell every State to starve terrorists of money, haven and arms (Resolution 1373). The Counter-Terrorism Committee was created to watch that order. Associated bodies — the Executive Directorate, the ISIL and Al-Qaida sanctions list, Resolution 1540 on weapons of mass destruction — built a global bureaucracy of lists. The threat is real. The effectiveness is partial, political and paper-heavy.
Body
The machine
1373 is binding on all United Nations members, not only on a few treaty parties.
- Peg: The Committee and its Executive Directorate assess laws, visit with consent, and match needy States with donors for border, aviation and financial capacity.
- Peg: The 1267 / 1989 / 2253 list still constrains travel and freezes assets of named ISIL and Al-Qaida affiliates.
- Peg: Resolution 1540 covers non-State access to weapons of mass destruction — a related but distinct file.
- Peg: Financial Action Task Force standards rhyme with this architecture and often bite harder on banks.
What it does well
Some plots have been made harder. That is not nothing.
- Peg: A worldwide legislative checklist now exists where, before 2001, many States had no terror-finance offence.
- Peg: Aviation security and passenger-name norms moved because Council pressure met the International Civil Aviation Organization.
- Peg: Capacity visits and donor matching are the unglamorous half of mitigation.
What it cannot do
The Committee is a committee of a divided Council.
- Peg: There is no agreed United Nations definition of terrorism; one State’s fighter is another’s listed name.
- Peg: Permanent-member politics decide when a listing moves; the Committee does not command troops and cannot stop a client of a veto.
- Peg: Special rapporteurs keep warning that 1373 was used to crush dissent; financing has moved to crypto, hawala and social media faster than listing cycles.
- Peg: Lone actors sit awkwardly on an ISIL-shaped list; regional organisations do the arrests. Effectiveness is high on the legislative checklist, medium on capacity, low on the politics of naming.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD R1373[Res 1373] --> CTC[CTC and CTED] CTC --> CAP[Capacity and reports] L1267[1267 list] --> F[Freeze travel] P5[P5 politics] --> X[Naming gap] CTC --> X R1540[Res 1540 WMD] --> CTC
Conclusion
The Counter-Terrorism Committee and its cluster built a worldwide legal floor after 1373. They help States write laws and freeze some names. They do not define terrorism, command force, or override a veto. Against a significant threat, that is useful infrastructure — not a victory.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the geopolitical and geostrategic importance of Maldives for India, with a focus on global trade and energy flows. Further, also discuss how this relationship affects India's maritime security and regional stability amidst international competition?
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q20). View answer →
-
Can the Counter-Terrorism Committee sanction a State that sponsors terrorism?
The Security Council can. The Committee itself mainly monitors 1373. Sanctions are a separate, political Council act.
-
Is the Financial Action Task Force part of the Committee?
No. It is a separate standard-setter. Its grey lists often hurt more than a Committee letter.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q20 · GS II · 15 marks
"The reform process in the United Nations remains unresolved, because of the delicate imbalance of East and West and entanglement of the USA vs. Russo-Chinese alliance." Examine and critically evaluate the East-West policy confrontations in this regard. -
2020 · Q16 · GS II · 15 marks
"The incidence and intensity of poverty are more important in determining poverty based on income alone". In this context analyze the latest United Nations Multidimensional Poverty Index Report. -
2018 · Q19 · GS II · 15 marks
What are the key areas of reform if the WTO has to survive in the present context of 'Trade War', especially keeping in mind the interest of India? (15). -
2017 · Q10 · GS II · 10 marks
What are the main functions of the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)? Explain different functional commissions attached to it. -
2016 · Q17 · GS II · 12 marks
"The broader aims and objectives of WTO are to manage and promote international trade in the era of globalization. But the Doha round of negotiations seem doomed due to differences between the developed and the developing countries." Discuss in the Indian perspective. -
2015 · Q18 · GS II · 12 marks
Discuss the impediments India is facing in its pursuit of a permanent seat in UNSC.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks
Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees, with particular reference to "one nation - one election" principle.
Indian Constitution
Tarkunde, Goswami, Law Commission 170/255 and the Election Commission have long asked for ceilings on party spend, faster petitions, and inner-party democracy. Candidate spend is capped; party spend is not, which is why money still dominates the poll. ADR disclosure and Lily Thomas reduced opacity and the conviction cushion; they did not end criminalisation. ONOE, as framed by the Kovind committee, promises one Model Code freeze, lower cost and less policy freeze. Federal cost: truncated Assemblies, President’s Rule risk, and nationalisation of State polls. Simultaneity is not a substitute for audited party finance and a statutory Code. Reform that works is a package, not a single polling date.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks
Explain and distinguish between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals. Whether they entertain civil as well as criminal cases?
Separation of Powers
Lok Adalat is a Legal Services Authorities Act forum: conciliation, award as a decree, generally no appeal. It hears civil matters and compoundable criminal cases, not non-compoundable crime. Arbitration is contractual under the 1996 Act: civil-commercial disputes, Section 34 challenge, no criminal trial. Booz Allen and Vidya Drolia mark what cannot be sent to a private tribunal. Permanent Lok Adalats for public utilities are a statutory hybrid, still not private arbitration. The working distinction is public compromise at little cost versus paid private adjudication.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks
"The growth of cabinet system has practkally resulted in the marginalisation of the parliamentary supremacy." Elucidate.
Parliament and State Legislatures
Articles 74–75 keep the Cabinet responsible to the Lok Sabha; that is the legal core of parliamentary government. Whips and the Tenth Schedule, ordinances and money-bill classification have moved real initiation to the Cabinet. This is practical marginalisation of the floor, not a legal repeal of Parliament. PAC, standing committees, Rajya Sabha and the floor test still bite. Keisham Meghachandra pressed Speakers to decide disqualification on a clock. A narrower anti-defection law would restore some of the supremacy the quote says is lost. The examiner’s misspelling does not change the demand: show practice squeezing text, not text dying.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.