Revision summary
NAM, G77 and South–South programmes built India’s image as a leader of colonised and developing nations. Post-1991 weight, nuclear diplomacy and Indo-Pacific partnerships created a major-power role. The old image has thinned where India looks like a US-leaning security player and a market competitor. ITEC, WTO developing-country coalitions and strategic autonomy show continuity. Elaborate as layering and tension, not as a clean disappearance.
Model answer
Introduction
From Bandung and the Non-Aligned Movement through the G77 and the demand for a New International Economic Order, India spoke as a large poor country that claimed to lead the colonised and the developing world. In the emerging order after the Cold War — and more sharply in the 2000s — India also seeks a permanent UN Security Council seat, a nuclear-normal identity, and a place among major powers. The old image has thinned; it has not cleanly disappeared.
Body
The long-sustained image
- Anti-colonial solidarity, NAM under Nehru, and later South–South rhetoric (ITEC, concessional lines of credit, UN peacekeeping) built the picture of India as a voice of the oppressed nations, not a camp follower of Washington or Moscow.
- India used that identity in WTO coalitions (G20 developing countries in agriculture, G33), in climate talks as a developing-country leader with China in BASIC, and in the Commonwealth and African forums.
- Moral language — decolonisation, anti-apartheid, disarmament — was the public face, even when realpolitik with neighbours was harder.
The emerging global order and the new role
- Economic weight after 1991, the India–US civil nuclear path (2008 NSG waiver politics), and later the Quad, 2+2 dialogues, and Indo-Pacific language placed India closer to a major-power table.
- Aspirations: permanent UNSC membership, NSG membership, a larger IMF–World Bank voice, and a role in setting digital and maritime rules.
- Multi-alignment (BRICS, SCO, RIC, Quad at once) is the method: India wants options, not a single camp. That is a different image from NAM chair of the weak.
Why the old image appears to have disappeared
- Voting and language at the United Nations on some Western-led resolutions, and a tighter US and Quad security conversation, are read in parts of the Global South as a shift away from automatic third-world solidarity.
- India’s own rise makes it a competitor for African and Asian markets, not only a brother of the marginalised; lines of credit come with project politics.
- Climate and trade: as emissions and services exports grow, India is asked to take “major economy” burdens that poor island states do not see as leadership of the oppressed.
- Domestic development success stories sit beside inequality; partners may see a would-be great power, not a fellow victim of the old order.
Why “disappeared” is too strong
- India still runs a large ITEC and development-partnership programme; it still argues special and differential treatment in the WTO; it still speaks for African representation in global governance in BRICS and IBSA language.
- Vaccine diplomacy (later than this 2019 paper’s core years, but in the same trajectory of South–South health) and peacekeeping continuity show the old register is usable.
- Strategic autonomy remains official doctrine: refusal of alliance, and continued Russia defence and energy ties, are not the behaviour of a country that has fully joined the established West.
- The emerging order is itself multi-polar; leadership of the marginalised and a seat among major powers are both Indian claims, in tension, not a completed substitution.
Elaboration
- The statement captures a real rebranding: from NAM tribune to multi-aligned major power.
- It overstates erasure. The image has been layered, not deleted. Friction appears when a Quad speech and a G77 speech must be given in the same week.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD NAM[NAM South-South image] --> Ten[Tension] New[Major-power role Quad UNSC bid] --> Ten Ten --> Multi[Multi-alignment] Multi --> Both[Layered identity not full disappearance]
Conclusion
India’s long image as leader of oppressed nations has faded because the emerging order rewards major-power behaviour — UNSC bid, nuclear normalcy, Indo-Pacific partnerships. It has not disappeared: South–South cooperation, WTO developing-country coalitions, and strategic autonomy still use the older language. The new role sits on top of the old image and sometimes contradicts it.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
"What introduces friction into the ties between India and the United States is that Washington is still unable to find for India a position in its global strategy, which would satisfy India's National self- esteem and ambitions" Explain with suitable examples.(15).
Next question on this syllabus topic (2019 · Q20). View answer →
-
Has India left the Global South?
No. It still claims developing-country status in many talks. It also claims major-power privileges. That double claim is the elaboration of the quote.
-
Is Quad proof that the NAM image is dead?
Quad is a security and technology conversation, not a treaty alliance. NAM as a movement has itself faded globally. India’s autonomy claim continues in other forums.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2019 · Q2 · GS II · 10 marks
"The Central Administration Tribunal which was established for redressal of grievances and complaints by or against central government employees, nowadays is exercising its powers as an independent judicial authority." Explain. -
2019 · Q3 · GS II · 10 marks
What are the methods used by the Farmers organizations to influence the policy- makers in India and how effective are these methods? -
2019 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks
Despite Consistent experience of High growth, India still goes with the lowest indicators of human development. Examine the issues that make balanced and inclusive development elusive. -
2019 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks
Implementation of information and Communication Technology (ICT) based Projects / Programmes usually suffers in terms of certain vital factors. Identify these factors, and suggest measures for their effective implementation. -
2019 · Q9 · GS II · 10 marks
'The time has come for India and Japan to build a strong contemporary relationship, one involving global and strategic partnership that will have a great significance for Asia and the world as a whole.' Comment. -
2019 · Q11 · GS II · 15 marks
On what grounds a people's representative can be disqualified under the Representation of People Act, 1951? Also mention the remedies available to such person against his disqualification.(15). -
2019 · Q13 · GS II · 15 marks
"The reservation of seats for women in the institutions of local self- government has had a limited impact on the patriarchal character of the Indian Political Process." Comment.(15). -
2019 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks
"The Attorney-General is the chief legal adviser and lawyer of the Government of India." Discuss.(15).
More from this topic
Q18 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights has to address the challenges faced by children in the digital era. Examine the existing policies and suggest measures the Commission can initiate to tackle the issue.
Governance and Policy
Harms: grooming, bullying, addictive design, data profiling, deepfakes, influencer labour, and exclusion without devices. Law: POCSO, IT rules, JJ Act, DPDP 2023 parental consent, NEP caution on ed-tech. NCPCR can inquire, recommend and move courts under the 2005 Act. Measures: age-assurance, school device rules with offline equity, POCSO e-evidence protocol, ed-tech data audits, 1098 integration, influencer-work codes, privacy-by-default for minors. The Commission should regulate design, not become a meme censor.
Q17 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
"In contemporary development models, decision-making and problem-solving responsibilities are not located close to the source of information and execution defeating the objectives of development." Critically evaluate.
Governance and Policy
The quote names a split: knowledge at the bottom, decisions at the top, execution in between. CSS, SPVs and parallel bodies bypass 73rd/74th institutions that the Constitution empowered. 2nd ARC and Punchhi already diagnosed fragmentation of the local State. The critique fits toilets, housing and MGNREGA planning; it fits less for vaccines, tax and defence. Repair: subsidiarity, untied local finance, elected control of SPVs, shared MIS with the Gram Sabha.
Q15 · UPSC Mains 2025 · GS II · 15 marks
What are environmental pressure groups? Discuss their role in raising awareness, influencing policies and advocating for environmental protection in India.
Governance and Policy
Environmental pressure groups organise to change ecological decisions of State and firms. Awareness: Chipko, Silent Valley, CSE and climate networks. Policy: EPA, FRA, NGT, EIA contests, PESA and mining consent. Advocacy: Mehta cases, Godavarman, Niyamgiri, Narmada and later climate-rights litigation. Limits: urban bias versus FRA communities, science errors, FCRA chill; they are one constitutional voice, not the ministry.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.