Revision summary
India is a parliamentary democracy with collective responsibility to the Lok Sabha. The United States is a presidential system with separation of powers and checks and balances. India is a strong-Centre Union; the USA is a dual federation with residual State power and equal Senate votes. Both have written constitutions and judicial review; India adds basic structure and Directive Principles. Elections, rights and federalism are shared tenets worked through different institutions.
Model answer
Introduction
India and the United States are large, written-constitution democracies with federal maps, regular elections, and independent courts. Their basic tenets still differ: India fused the executive with a parliamentary majority; the United States separated a separately elected President from Congress. One is a Westminster-style Union of States; the other is a presidential federation of States that were originally sovereign.
Body
Executive and legislature
- India’s basic tenet is parliamentary government: the President is a constitutional head; the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers are collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha (Articles 74 and 75).
- The United States’ basic tenet is a presidential executive: the President is Head of State and government, elected independently of Congress, and Cabinet members do not sit in the legislature.
- India can change the government by a floor test without a general election; the United States removes a President only by impeachment or election, which is stability of tenure against fusion of powers.
- Law-making in India is led by the ministry that commands the House; in the United States, legislation needs House, Senate and often a Presidential signature, which is designed gridlock as a check.
Federal tenet
- Both are federal in the sense of two levels of government and a written division of powers.
- India’s tenet is a strong-Centre or “quasi-federal” Union: a long Union List, residuary power with the Union, single Constitution, single citizenship, All-India Services, and Article 356.
- The United States’ tenet is dual federalism in origin: residual powers with the States (Tenth Amendment), equal Senate representation of States, dual citizenship, and no Union power to dismiss a State government.
- India’s Rajya Sabha is not a council of equal States; population weights the Lok Sabha. The U.S. Senate is the federal bargain of equal States.
Rights, courts and the written text
- Both rest on a supreme written Constitution and judicial review. Marbury v. Madison is the U.S. starting point; Kesavananda Bharati’s basic structure is India’s added lock on the amending power.
- India’s Part III is a justiciable bill of rights with reasonable restrictions written into several articles; the U.S. Bill of Rights is a set of negative restraints, later applied to States through incorporation.
- India’s judiciary is integrated: one hierarchy up to the Supreme Court. The United States keeps dual court systems, federal and State.
- India has Directive Principles and a longer social-economic script; the U.S. text is shorter and leaves welfare mainly to statute and politics.
People, parties and elections
- Both use first-past-the-post for the popular lower House; the U.S. President is chosen through an Electoral College, not a national popular-vote majority as a constitutional rule.
- India has a constitutional Election Commission (Article 324) and a multi-party system with anti-defection law (Tenth Schedule).
- The United States has a durable two-party system, primaries, and no equivalent anti-defection schedule; party switching is political, not a disqualification code.
- India is a republic with a parliamentary cabinet; the United States is a republic with separation of powers, checks and balances, and a stronger taste for divided government.
Emergency, amendment and political culture
- India writes emergency and President’s Rule into the Constitution; the U.S. text has no Article 356 analogue.
- Amendment in India can be by Parliament alone for many articles, or with half the States for federal provisions (Article 368). U.S. Article V is far more rigid.
- Both tenets include civilian control of the military, a free press as practice, and federal diversity in a continental society — India through linguistic States and a Union list; the United States through State police power and a national commerce clause.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Two large democracies] --> I[India parliamentary Union] D --> U[USA presidential federation] I --> C[Collective responsibility Art 75] U --> P[Separated President and Congress] I --> F[Strong Centre Article 356] U --> S[Equal Senate Tenth Amendment]
Conclusion
The two large democracies share a written Constitution, federalism, elections and judicial review. India’s basic tenets are parliamentary responsibility, a strong Centre, an integrated judiciary and an amendable social Constitution. The United States’ basic tenets are separation of powers, a separately elected President, dual federalism with equal Senate States, and a rigid rights text. The family resemblance is democracy; the working grammar is not the same.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
How is the Finance Commission of India constituted? What do you know about the terms of reference of the recently constituted Finance Commission? Discuss. (15).
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q14). View answer →
-
Is India a copy of the U.S. presidency?
No. India’s President is a constitutional head. The real executive is the ministry responsible to the Lok Sabha, which is the Westminster tenet.
-
Are both countries federal in the same way?
Both divide power by a written Constitution. India tilts to the Union; the United States began as a bargain of equal States with residual State power.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2018 · Q6 · GS II · 10 marks
"Policy contradictions among various competing sectors and stakeholders have resulted in inadequate 'protection and prevention of degradation to environment." Comment with relevant illustrations. -
2018 · Q9 · GS II · 10 marks
"India's relations with Israel have, of late, acquired a depth and diversity, which cannot be rolled back." Discuss. (10 ). -
2018 · Q10 · GS II · 10 marks
A number of outside powers have entrenched themselves in Central Asia, which is a zone of interest to India. Discuss the implications, in this context, of India's joining the Ashgabat Agreement, 2018. -
2018 · Q14 · GS II · 15 marks
How is the Finance Commission of India constituted? What do you know about the terms of reference of the recently constituted Finance Commission? Discuss. (15). -
2018 · Q15 · GS II · 15 marks
Assess the importance of the Panchayat system in India as a part of local government. Apart from government grants, what sources the Panchayats can look out for financing developmental projects? (15). -
2018 · Q20 · GS II · 15 marks
In what ways would the ongoing US-Iran Nuclear Pact Controversy affect the national interest of India? How should India respond to its situation? (15). -
2017 · Q1 · GS II · 10 marks
"The local self government system in India has not proved to be effective instrument of governance". Critically examine the statement and give your views to improve the situation. -
2017 · Q4 · GS II · 10 marks
How do pressure groups influence Indian political process? Do you agree with this view that informal pressure groups have emerged as powerful than formal pressure groups in recent years?
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS II · 10 marks
In the light of recent controversy regarding the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVM), what are the challenges before the Election Commission of India to ensure the trustworthiness of elections in India?
Constitutional Bodies
Article 324 and the 1951 Act make the Election Commission responsible for a trustworthy poll, not only for a working machine. The Supreme Court required VVPAT, but sample slip-counting remains too small in the eyes of many parties. Storage, randomisation, mock poll and same-day mismatch data are the operational weak points. SVEEP and all-party technical briefings must explain the paper trail, not only turnout. A larger, statistically designed VVPAT audit is the practical way to keep EVMs without a trust crash.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS II · 10 marks
Whether National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) can enforce the implementation of constitutional reservation for the Scheduled Castes in the religious minority institutions? Examine.
Indian Constitution
Article 338 makes the NCSC a constitutional watchdog, not a court that can execute reservation. Articles 15(4) and 16 bind the State; Article 15(5) expressly spares minority institutions under Article 30. T.M.A. Pai, P.A. Inamdar, Ashoka Kumar Thakur and Pramati protect that minority space. The Commission may still take discrimination complaints and advise on grants. Only a constitutional amendment, not an NCSC order, could force SC reservation into genuine religious minority institutions.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · GS II · 10 marks
Under what circumstances can the Financial Emergency be proclaimed by the President of India? What consequences follow when such a declaration remains in force?
Indian Constitution
Article 360 is triggered only by a threat to the financial stability or credit of India or any part of it. Parliament must approve the proclamation within two months; it then lasts until revoked. The Union can direct States on financial propriety and reduce salaries of Union and State servants, including judges. State Money Bills and related financial Bills may be reserved for the President. The clause has never been proclaimed; ordinary fiscal law is the first line of defence.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.