Q6(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks · 2 min read

← Q6(a) Q1(a) →

Trace the history and describe the methods of formulating the lists of OBCs, both at the State and National levels

Topic: Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization. Syllabus: 1.1 Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization—Prehistoric (Palaeolithic, Mesolithic, Neolithic and Neolithic-Chalcolithic), Protohistoric (Indus Civilization). Pre-Harappan, Harappan and post-Harappan cultures. Contributions of the tribal cultures to Indian civilization. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2025 and Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization.

Revision summary

Kalelkar listed; Mandal implemented 27 percent with social-educational-economic tests. Indra Sawhney added creamy layer and a 50 percent ceiling. 102nd Amendment constitutionalised NCBC; 105th restored state lists after the Maratha judgment. Rohini tries to sub-categorise Central OBCs; Ram Singh required data for Jat inclusion. Centre and states maintain separate lists; method is gazette politics under judicial review.

Model answer

Introduction

Other Backward Classes are not in the original caste-schedule sense of SC/ST. They are a developmental-political list of socially and educationally backward groups, built by commissions, gazettes and courts. History and method are one story.

Body

National history

Kaka Kalelkar Commission (1953) first listed backward classes for the Union; Nehru’s government did not implement a national quota from it, partly because the list looked like a caste census. Mandal Commission (1979, report 1980, implemented 1990) used social, educational and economic indicators, 1931 census proxies, and arrived at about 52 percent of the population as OBC, recommending 27 percent jobs. Indra Sawhney (1992) upheld 27 percent, barred reservation in promotions for OBCs (as then argued), imposed creamy layer, and set a 50 percent ceiling except in extraordinary situations.

NCBC began as a statutory body (1993) and became constitutional by the 102nd Amendment (2018). Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil (Maratha, 2021) read 102nd as giving the President (Union) the exclusive power to notify SEBCs for the purpose of Article 342A, unsettling state lists. The 105th Amendment (2021) restored states’ power to make their own OBC lists. Rohini Commission (sub-categorisation of Central OBCs) tried to split a lumped list so that a few dominant OBCs do not take most posts; its politics remain unfinished.

Janhit Abhiyan (2022) upheld EWS 10 percent, showing another backwardness track beside OBC.

State methods

States had backward-class commissions and lists before Mandal (Tamil Nadu’s long quota history, Karnataka, Bihar). Methods: public notification, representations, socio-economic surveys, public hearings, and a gazette. Some states use occupation plus caste; some notify Muslim occupational groups as OBC. Quantifiable data after Indra Sawhney and later Ram Singh (Jat, 2015) is the judicial test: a state cannot notify a dominant agrarian caste as OBC on assertion alone.

Inclusion and exclusion petitions go to the state commission, then to the government, then often to the High Court. Central list for Union jobs and UPSC is separate from the state list for state services. A community can be OBC in one and not the other.

What “method” means

It is not anthropometry. It is indicators, politics, gazette and judicial review. Anthropology’s caste ethnography (dominant caste, Sanskritisation) explains why some powerful jatis still reach the list. The honest method would be a caste census with deprivation scores and sub-quotas. India has pieces of that (Bihar survey, Rohini) without a settled national instrument.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  K[Kalelkar] --> M[Mandal 27 percent]
  M --> I[Indra Sawhney]
  I --> N[NCBC 102 105]
  S[State commissions] --> G[Two lists Centre / state]

Conclusion

OBC lists grew from Kalelkar’s unused catalogue to Mandal’s 27 percent, Indra Sawhney’s rules, a constitutional NCBC, a shock after the 102nd Amendment, and restoration by the 105th. States and the Union keep separate gazettes. The method is commission plus data plus court, not a blood test.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Digitisation of rural economy

    Next question on this syllabus topic (2024 · Q1(a)). View answer →

  • Is OBC the same as Shudra varna?

    No. The list is empirical and political. Some Shudra groups are dominant and fail the data test; some Muslim and Christian occupational groups are included in states.

  • Why two lists?

    Federalism. Union jobs follow the Central list; state jobs follow the state list. A person may be OBC for one and not the other.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    'Soanian cultural' tradition

    View answer →

  2. 2025 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Caste domination, factionalism and political power

    View answer →

  3. 2025 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Verrier Elwin's philosophy with respect to Arunachal Pradesh

    View answer →

  4. 2025 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Delineate the major features of S. S. Sarkar's classification of Indian populations. Was his classification better than Risley? Explain

    View answer →

  5. 2025 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Describe the distinctive features and distribution of Upper Palaeolithic of India

    View answer →

  6. 2025 · Q4(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Critically examine the concept of Scheduled Tribe (ST) and mention the limitations of administrator's criteria

    View answer →

  7. 2025 · Q5(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Tribalism and Pseudotribalism

    View answer →

  8. 2025 · Q5(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Varnashrama and its contemporary relevance

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q6(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

"The village was not merely a place where people lived; it had a design in which were reflected the basic values of Indian civilization." Who said this? Elaborate

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

The statement is from the Srinivas village-studies tradition: the village as a designed microcosm of Indian civilisation. Design includes caste ecology, agrarian rank, ritual calendar and factional politics. Values: hierarchy-with-interdependence, local dharma, jati marriage, sacred geography. Marriott, Dube and Bailey showed regional versions of the same idea. Land reform, migration, 73rd Amendment and PESA have rewritten the plan without erasing rank.

Q5(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Lothal dockyard and international trade relations.

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

S. R. Rao identified a burnt-brick tidal basin at Lothal as a dock beside warehouses and bead workshops. Gujarat Harappan coastal sites together support craft export to the Gulf and Mesopotamia (Meluhha). Some archaeologists prefer a reservoir reading; geomorphology of the estuary is still discussed. Even without the word dock, Lothal is a water-edge trade and craft town. International trade here is Bronze Age Gulf networks, not a modern port trust.

Q5(d) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Varnashrama and its contemporary relevance

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Varna is fourfold rank; ashrama is four life-stages; together they are a Brahmanical ideal. Lived organisation is jati, with Sanskritisation toward varna images. Law (Arts. 14–17, atrocities Act, personal-law judgments) breaks purity as public rule. Ashrama is thin: the householder remains, vanaprastha is rare. Politics uses Savarna/Bahujan and Mandal lists, not Manu’s chart as administration.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.