Q1(e) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks · 2 min read

← Q1 Q2 →

Characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions.

Topic: Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society. Syllabus: 5.3 Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society: Sanskritization, Westernization, Modernization; Inter-play of little and great traditions; Panchayati Raj and social change; Media and Social change. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2025 and Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society.

Revision summary

Redfield’s Great Tradition is textual, specialist and pan-regional; the Little Tradition is local, oral and village or tribal. Marriott’s universalisation and parochialisation, and Srinivas’s Sanskritisation, describe the traffic between them. Vidyarthi’s Gaya sacred complex is a pilgrimage switchboard. Tribal festival-taking and sacred-grove law (FRA, PESA) are living two-way examples. The pair is a civilisation process, not two separate India.

Model answer

Introduction

Robert Redfield distinguished Little and Great Traditions in peasant civilisations. McKim Marriott, Milton Singer and M. N. Srinivas made the pair a working tool for India. Communication between the two is the point of the question, not a static list of traits.

Body

Characteristics

  • The Great Tradition is the literate, pan-regional, textual and specialist stream: Vedas and Puranas, shastra, classical Islam of the qazi and madrasa, Buddhist and Jain canons, temple Agamas, court music. It is carried by priests, monks, lawyers and urban elites. It claims universality.
  • The Little Tradition is the local, often oral, village and tribal stream: harvest rites, lineage gods, possession, caste panchayat custom, sacred groves, local dargahs. It is carried by households, mediums, bards and elders. It is specific to a place.

Redfield insisted they are dimensions of one civilisation, not two countries. Indian civilisation is the long conversation between them.

How they communicate

Marriott, in Kishan Garhi, named universalisation (a local goddess or rite is rewritten as a Sanskritic deity or pan-Indian festival) and parochialisation (a Puranic story is pulled down into a village plot, a local name, a local pond). Srinivas’s Sanskritisation is a related mobility strategy: a caste copies the Great Tradition’s ritual style. Islamisation and Christianisation are parallel upward or outward pulls. Tribalisation and revival of sacred groves, or the reclaiming of a village deity against a temple committee, are reverse flows.

L. P. Vidyarthi’s sacred complex of Gaya — sacred geography, sacred performances, sacred specialists — shows a pilgrimage city as a switchboard between village ancestors and a pan-Hindu Gaya-shraddha. N. K. Bose described tribes taking Hindu festivals while keeping clan gods. S. C. Roy’s Oraon and Munda work already showed this two-way traffic.

A living example is Ayyappa at Sabarimala, where forest pilgrimage, tribal hill memory and a Sanskritic vrata meet, later litigated in Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala. Another is PESA and FRA recognising Gram Sabha and community forest resource — the Little Tradition of grove and commons — against a Forest Department that once spoke only the Great Tradition of colonial statute.

  • Cinema, television and social media now carry both: a televised katha is Great Tradition in a Little living room; a village reel can become a national saint overnight.

Flow diagram

flowchart LR
  L[Little Tradition] -->|universalisation| G[Great Tradition]
  G -->|parochialisation| L
  L -->|Sanskritisation| G

Conclusion

Little and Great Traditions are two circuits of the same civilisation. Universalisation, parochialisation and Sanskritisation are the wires between them. Indian examples run from Gaya and Kishan Garhi to sacred groves now named in forest-rights law.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2024 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    What are the ethical concerns in biological and socio-cultural anthropology because of recent advances in AI and genetic research?

    View answer →

  2. 2023 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    "Sanskritization is a culture-bound concept." Critically comment to assess the strength and limitation of this concept in developing a theoretical framework to study social change.

    View answer →

  3. 2021 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Ethnic media and social awareness

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Discuss how cultural diversity of Indian tribes has enriched its plural traditions

    View answer →

  5. 2016 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Examine the nature of interplay of little and great traditions in the context of globalization

    View answer →

  6. 2015 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Panchayati Raj Institutions and Social Change

    View answer →

  7. 2015 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks

    Examine the social implications of media and communication technology

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

'Soanian cultural' tradition

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

The Soanian is a cobble-tool tradition of the north-west Siwalik rivers, named by de Terra and Paterson. Typical tools are choppers, chopping tools and flakes in quartzite, not handaxe–cleaver sets. Indian occurrences include Pinjore–Nalagarh, Guler and related Beas–Sutlej terraces. Movius once opposed it to Acheulian Asia; later work finds overlap and mixed surface collections. It records Pleistocene foothill settlement, not a separate race of makers.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Caste domination, factionalism and political power

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Srinivas’s dominant caste combines numbers, land, rank and an educated elite. Factions are vertical followings around leaders, described by Bailey and others. Village domination scaled into regional parties after adult franchise. Mandal and Indra Sawhney widened OBC claims; panchayat reservation shares some offices. Caste blocs remain, but they now work through parties, cooperatives and social media as well as the village.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Regionalism and Autonomy

The concept of ethnicity

Regionalism politicises territory through language, tribe, history or economy. Autonomy is the constitutional reply: new states, Fifth and Sixth Schedules, PESA, Article 371, Inner Line. Bhuria and Xaxa named the gap between paper PESA and practice. Bommai, Sarkaria and Punchhi frame the Union–state balance. Examples include Telangana, Bodoland, Gorkhaland, Naga accords and resource belts under Samata and FRA.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.