Revision summary
Media and phones create national and caste publics beyond the village square. Srinivas linked earlier mass media to Westernisation and politics. Little and great traditions both travel on screens. Dalit and Adivasi voices gain channels; hate and honour policing also gain speed. Technology reorganises Indian society; it does not delete caste or tribe.
Model answer
Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.
Introduction
Media and communication technology reorganise who speaks, who is seen, and which tradition travels. In India the village, caste, and tribe now sit inside a national and global circuit of screens.
Body
New publics
- Print, radio, and television first made a Hindi and regional public sphere that M. N. Srinivas already linked to Westernisation and political mobilisation.
- Mobile phones and internet carry the same village into WhatsApp kin groups, caste pages, and job news. Distance shrinks; rumour also speeds.
- Yogendra Singh treated modernisation as structural. Cheap media is one such structure: it differentiates youth taste from elder control.
Caste, gender, and little tradition
- Televised myth and temple live-streams intensify Marriott’s great tradition, while local jati YouTube keeps little tradition alive.
- Dalit and Adivasi channels claim dignity that the old village square denied. The same platforms host honour videos and hate speech.
- Women’s phones can mean safety and surveillance at once. The household still tries to police the screen.
Tribe and market
- Tribal belts receive state schemes and mining ads on the same handset that carries FRA news and gospel or Hindu reform songs.
- N. K. Bose’s civilisational web now has a digital layer. Integration is thicker; so is extraction of attention and data.
- Communication technology does not abolish caste. It relocates rank, rumour, and resistance onto a faster medium.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD M[Media tech] --> P[New publics] M --> C[Caste gender online] M --> T[Tribe market rumour]
Conclusion
Media technology expands publics and weakens some village monopolies of news. It also scales caste, gender control, and market reach. The implication is reorganisation, not the end of Indian social structure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Does social media destroy the Indian village?
It plugs the village into wider circuits. Kin and caste still organise much of the traffic.
-
Is this only urban?
Cheap mobiles made the implication rural and tribal as well as metropolitan.
Same topic · past papers
UPSC has asked this before
These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.
-
2025 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions.
More from this topic
Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks · Solution
Make a critical appraisal of Surajit Sinha's line of argument that tribes and castes may not be isolated social categories, but are a part of the great Indian civilization
Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society
Surajit Sinha posited that Indian tribes and castes are not isolated phenomena but integral parts of a continuous civilizational framework. Through historical processes of state formation, Hinduization, and agrarian incorporation, tribes were absorbed into the Hindu caste system. However, this civilizational view has been critiqued for masking the forced assimilation, economic exploitation, and loss of indigenous autonomy experienced by tribal communities. Contemporary tribal movements increasingly reject this seamless civilizational continuity in favor of distinct ethnic identities. Thus, Sinha's paradigm remains foundational for understanding Indian social structure while requiring critical re-evaluation.
Q1(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution
Characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions.
Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society
Redfield’s Great Tradition is textual, specialist and pan-regional; the Little Tradition is local, oral and village or tribal. Marriott’s universalisation and parochialisation, and Srinivas’s Sanskritisation, describe the traffic between them. Vidyarthi’s Gaya sacred complex is a pilgrimage switchboard. Tribal festival-taking and sacred-grove law (FRA, PESA) are living two-way examples. The pair is a civilisation process, not two separate India.
Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks · Solution
What are the ethical concerns in biological and socio-cultural anthropology because of recent advances in AI and genetic research?
Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society
Genetic ethics: informed and community consent, privacy, no racial misuse of ancestry or aDNA, voluntary medical screening, strict control of heritable genome editing. Artificial intelligence ethics: biased classification, surveillance, loss of ethnographic anonymity, deepfakes and false cultural authority. ICMR, IRB, AAA and Nagoya-type benefit-sharing are the working rules. Do not treat genomes or models as a new Risley. Communities must be able to refuse sampling and recording.