Revision summary
Media and phones create national and caste publics beyond the village square. Srinivas linked earlier mass media to Westernisation and politics. Little and great traditions both travel on screens. Dalit and Adivasi voices gain channels; hate and honour policing also gain speed. Technology reorganises Indian society; it does not delete caste or tribe.
Model answer
Introduction
Media and communication technology reorganise who speaks, who is seen, and which tradition travels. In India the village, caste, and tribe now sit inside a national and global circuit of screens.
Body
New publics
- Print, radio, and television first made a Hindi and regional public sphere that M. N. Srinivas already linked to Westernisation and political mobilisation.
- Mobile phones and internet carry the same village into WhatsApp kin groups, caste pages, and job news. Distance shrinks; rumour also speeds.
- Yogendra Singh treated modernisation as structural. Cheap media is one such structure: it differentiates youth taste from elder control.
Caste, gender, and little tradition
- Televised myth and temple live-streams intensify Marriott’s great tradition, while local jati YouTube keeps little tradition alive.
- Dalit and Adivasi channels claim dignity that the old village square denied. The same platforms host honour videos and hate speech.
- Women’s phones can mean safety and surveillance at once. The household still tries to police the screen.
Tribe and market
- Tribal belts receive state schemes and mining ads on the same handset that carries FRA news and gospel or Hindu reform songs.
- N. K. Bose’s civilisational web now has a digital layer. Integration is thicker; so is extraction of attention and data.
- Communication technology does not abolish caste. It relocates rank, rumour, and resistance onto a faster medium.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD M[Media tech] --> P[New publics] M --> C[Caste gender online] M --> T[Tribe market rumour]
Conclusion
Media technology expands publics and weakens some village monopolies of news. It also scales caste, gender control, and market reach. The implication is reorganisation, not the end of Indian social structure.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Does social media destroy the Indian village?
It plugs the village into wider circuits. Kin and caste still organise much of the traffic.
-
Is this only urban?
Cheap mobiles made the implication rural and tribal as well as metropolitan.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions. -
2024 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
What are the ethical concerns in biological and socio-cultural anthropology because of recent advances in AI and genetic research? -
2023 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Sanskritization is a culture-bound concept." Critically comment to assess the strength and limitation of this concept in developing a theoretical framework to study social change. -
2021 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Ethnic media and social awareness -
2016 · Q2(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss how cultural diversity of Indian tribes has enriched its plural traditions -
2016 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Examine the nature of interplay of little and great traditions in the context of globalization -
2015 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Panchayati Raj Institutions and Social Change
More from this topic
Q1(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions.
Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society
Redfield’s Great Tradition is textual, specialist and pan-regional; the Little Tradition is local, oral and village or tribal. Marriott’s universalisation and parochialisation, and Srinivas’s Sanskritisation, describe the traffic between them. Vidyarthi’s Gaya sacred complex is a pilgrimage switchboard. Tribal festival-taking and sacred-grove law (FRA, PESA) are living two-way examples. The pair is a civilisation process, not two separate India.
Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
What are the ethical concerns in biological and socio-cultural anthropology because of recent advances in AI and genetic research?
Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society
Genetic ethics: informed and community consent, privacy, no racial misuse of ancestry or aDNA, voluntary medical screening, strict control of heritable genome editing. Artificial intelligence ethics: biased classification, surveillance, loss of ethnographic anonymity, deepfakes and false cultural authority. ICMR, IRB, AAA and Nagoya-type benefit-sharing are the working rules. Do not treat genomes or models as a new Risley. Communities must be able to refuse sampling and recording.
Q3(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Sanskritization is a culture-bound concept." Critically comment to assess the strength and limitation of this concept in developing a theoretical framework to study social change.
Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society
Srinivas defined Sanskritisation as group copying of a higher caste’s ritual style to claim better rank. Its strength is empirical fit with Indian caste mobility and the little–great tradition traffic. It is culture-bound: it belongs to Hindu caste civilisation, not to all societies. Limits include conversion, non-Brahmin politics, class, and gender costs of new taboos. A theory of Indian social change needs Sanskritisation plus Westernisation, law, and conflict.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.