Q2(c) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks · 1 min read

← Q5(b) Q6(b) →

Discuss how cultural diversity of Indian tribes has enriched its plural traditions

Topic: Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society. Syllabus: 5.3 Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society: Sanskritization, Westernization, Modernization; Inter-play of little and great traditions; Panchayati Raj and social change; Media and Social change. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society.

Revision summary

Indian tribes differ in language, kinship, and political form. They feed little traditions into the civilisational web Bose described. Sanskritisation and pilgrimage are two-way, not only Hindu gift. Fifth and Sixth Schedules turn diversity into constitutional pluralism. Elwin and Haimendorf recorded that wealth against Ghurye’s flatten.

Model answer

Copper italics in this answer — like this — are the key facts. Each one is unpacked in the Facts & figures rail.

Introduction

Indian tribes do not form one culture. Their languages, kin, and rites feed the same plural civilisation that N. K. Bose called a web, not a single Hindu copy.

Body

What diversity looks like

  • Naga village republics, Gond clan ritual, Khasi matriliny, and Andaman forager bands are different political and kin worlds.
  • Grierson’s families split tribal speech across four stocks. Dance, textile, and jhum calendars differ with ecology.

Enrichment of the plural

  • Vidyarthi’s sacred complex and Hindu tirthas already include tribal pilgrims. Little traditions thicken the great.
  • Srinivas saw tribes as neighbours in Sanskritisation. The traffic is two-way: forest gods and possession cults enter regional Hinduism.
  • Sixth Schedule councils and Fifth Schedule custom are constitutional pluralism, not folklore.

Against flattening

  • Ghurye’s backward-Hindu thesis underplays this gift. Elwin and Haimendorf recorded it as civilisation in its own right.
  • Plural India is poorer if diversity is only a tourist list and land is gone.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  D[Tribal diversity] --> L[Language kin rite]
  D --> P[Plural civilisation]
  E[Elwin Bose] --> P

Conclusion

Tribal cultural diversity enriches Indian pluralism as language, kin, and political form. The republic houses it when schedules and FRA work; it loses it when only assimilation counts.

Quick related

Students also ask

Same topic · past papers

UPSC has asked this before

These previous-year questions sit on the same topic. Open one to practise the earlier ask.

  1. 2021 · Q5(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

    Cultural diversity and multiculturalism

    View answer →

  2. 2026 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks

    Why have the classifications of Indian populations, based on somatometric and somatoscopic characteristics, failed to develop a common understanding of the population diversity?

    View answer →

More from this topic

Q8(a) · UPSC Mains 2026 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks · Solution

Make a critical appraisal of Surajit Sinha's line of argument that tribes and castes may not be isolated social categories, but are a part of the great Indian civilization

Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society

Surajit Sinha posited that Indian tribes and castes are not isolated phenomena but integral parts of a continuous civilizational framework. Through historical processes of state formation, Hinduization, and agrarian incorporation, tribes were absorbed into the Hindu caste system. However, this civilizational view has been critiqued for masking the forced assimilation, economic exploitation, and loss of indigenous autonomy experienced by tribal communities. Contemporary tribal movements increasingly reject this seamless civilizational continuity in favor of distinct ethnic identities. Thus, Sinha's paradigm remains foundational for understanding Indian social structure while requiring critical re-evaluation.

Q1(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks · Solution

Characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions.

Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society

Redfield’s Great Tradition is textual, specialist and pan-regional; the Little Tradition is local, oral and village or tribal. Marriott’s universalisation and parochialisation, and Srinivas’s Sanskritisation, describe the traffic between them. Vidyarthi’s Gaya sacred complex is a pilgrimage switchboard. Tribal festival-taking and sacred-grove law (FRA, PESA) are living two-way examples. The pair is a civilisation process, not two separate India.

Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks · Solution

What are the ethical concerns in biological and socio-cultural anthropology because of recent advances in AI and genetic research?

Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society

Genetic ethics: informed and community consent, privacy, no racial misuse of ancestry or aDNA, voluntary medical screening, strict control of heritable genome editing. Artificial intelligence ethics: biased classification, surveillance, loss of ethnographic anonymity, deepfakes and false cultural authority. ICMR, IRB, AAA and Nagoya-type benefit-sharing are the working rules. Do not treat genomes or models as a new Risley. Communities must be able to refuse sampling and recording.

PDF