Revision summary
Indian tribes differ in language, kinship, and political form. They feed little traditions into the civilisational web Bose described. Sanskritisation and pilgrimage are two-way, not only Hindu gift. Fifth and Sixth Schedules turn diversity into constitutional pluralism. Elwin and Haimendorf recorded that wealth against Ghurye’s flatten.
Model answer
Introduction
Indian tribes do not form one culture. Their languages, kin, and rites feed the same plural civilisation that N. K. Bose called a web, not a single Hindu copy.
Body
What diversity looks like
- Naga village republics, Gond clan ritual, Khasi matriliny, and Andaman forager bands are different political and kin worlds.
- Grierson’s families split tribal speech across four stocks. Dance, textile, and jhum calendars differ with ecology.
Enrichment of the plural
- Vidyarthi’s sacred complex and Hindu tirthas already include tribal pilgrims. Little traditions thicken the great.
- Srinivas saw tribes as neighbours in Sanskritisation. The traffic is two-way: forest gods and possession cults enter regional Hinduism.
- Sixth Schedule councils and Fifth Schedule custom are constitutional pluralism, not folklore.
Against flattening
- Ghurye’s backward-Hindu thesis underplays this gift. Elwin and Haimendorf recorded it as civilisation in its own right.
- Plural India is poorer if diversity is only a tourist list and land is gone.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD D[Tribal diversity] --> L[Language kin rite] D --> P[Plural civilisation] E[Elwin Bose] --> P
Conclusion
Tribal cultural diversity enriches Indian pluralism as language, kin, and political form. The republic houses it when schedules and FRA work; it loses it when only assimilation counts.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Examine the nature of interplay of little and great traditions in the context of globalization
Next question on this syllabus topic (2016 · Q6(b)). View answer →
-
Is tribal diversity only colourful dress?
No. It is law, language, and land use.
-
Does unity require one custom?
Bose and the Constitution say no. Unity is a legal house for many customs.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions. -
2024 · Q4(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
What are the ethical concerns in biological and socio-cultural anthropology because of recent advances in AI and genetic research? -
2023 · Q3(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Sanskritization is a culture-bound concept." Critically comment to assess the strength and limitation of this concept in developing a theoretical framework to study social change. -
2021 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Ethnic media and social awareness -
2016 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Examine the nature of interplay of little and great traditions in the context of globalization -
2015 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Panchayati Raj Institutions and Social Change -
2015 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the social implications of media and communication technology
More from this topic
Q1(e) · UPSC Mains 2025 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Characteristics and communication between Little and Great Traditions.
Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society
Redfield’s Great Tradition is textual, specialist and pan-regional; the Little Tradition is local, oral and village or tribal. Marriott’s universalisation and parochialisation, and Srinivas’s Sanskritisation, describe the traffic between them. Vidyarthi’s Gaya sacred complex is a pilgrimage switchboard. Tribal festival-taking and sacred-grove law (FRA, PESA) are living two-way examples. The pair is a civilisation process, not two separate India.
Q4(a) · UPSC Mains 2024 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
What are the ethical concerns in biological and socio-cultural anthropology because of recent advances in AI and genetic research?
Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society
Genetic ethics: informed and community consent, privacy, no racial misuse of ancestry or aDNA, voluntary medical screening, strict control of heritable genome editing. Artificial intelligence ethics: biased classification, surveillance, loss of ethnographic anonymity, deepfakes and false cultural authority. ICMR, IRB, AAA and Nagoya-type benefit-sharing are the working rules. Do not treat genomes or models as a new Risley. Communities must be able to refuse sampling and recording.
Q3(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
"Sanskritization is a culture-bound concept." Critically comment to assess the strength and limitation of this concept in developing a theoretical framework to study social change.
Indigenous and exogenous processes of socio-cultural change in Indian society
Srinivas defined Sanskritisation as group copying of a higher caste’s ritual style to claim better rank. Its strength is empirical fit with Indian caste mobility and the little–great tradition traffic. It is culture-bound: it belongs to Hindu caste civilisation, not to all societies. Limits include conversion, non-Brahmin politics, class, and gender costs of new taboos. A theory of Indian social change needs Sanskritisation plus Westernisation, law, and conflict.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.