Revision summary
Mesolithic means Holocene microlith-using hunter-gatherers and early herders. Sedentism means staying through much of the year, not a single overnight camp. Bagor, Langhnaj, Adamgarh, Bhimbetka, and Ganga sites such as Damdama show repeated occupation and burials. That is a first step, comparable in logic to the Natufian, not a finished village. Mehrgarh, Burzahom, and Chirand mark fuller Neolithic sedentism.
Model answer
Introduction
The Mesolithic is the Holocene hunter-gatherer and early herder phase of microliths, between Palaeolithic mobility and Neolithic farming villages. Sedentism means staying at one place through much of the year. The Mesolithic is a first step toward that life in some places, not a completed village revolution.
Body
What Mesolithic people did
- Microliths, composite tools, fishing, hunting, and wild plant use mark the phase. In India, Bagor (Rajasthan), Adamgarh and Bhimbetka (Madhya Pradesh), Langhnaj (Gujarat), Sarai Nahar Rai, Mahadaha, and Damdama (Ganga valley) are type sites.
- V. N. Misra at Bagor showed a long occupation with later cattle, still not a full Neolithic town.
- Ganga valley cemeteries with many burials suggest repeated return to the same ground, which is a step beyond a one-night camp.
- Rock art at Bhimbetka records animals and groups in a landscape that was used again and again.
First step, not full sedentism
- True year-round farming villages in the north-west appear at Mehrgarh in the Neolithic, with mud-brick houses and stored grain.
- Burzahom (Kashmir) and Chirand (Bihar) are later settled Neolithic–Chalcolithic points. They are not Mesolithic.
- Many Mesolithic groups remained seasonally mobile: base camps plus hunting stations. Lewis Binford’s forager–collector model fits this better than a village map.
- West Asia shows the same nuance: Natufian hamlets before full Neolithic farming are a famous “first step”; Indian Bagor is a regional analogue, not a copy.
Regional variation
- Coastal and lake sites with fish and water plants can support longer stays than dry-upland hunting.
- Contact with early herders at Bagor blurs Mesolithic and pastoral. Sedentism here is a gradient.
Answer to the question
- Yes, Mesolithic repeated-use camps, burials, and broader diet were the first widespread step toward staying put after the Pleistocene.
- No, they were not yet the sedentary farming village. That step is Neolithic.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Palaeolithic mobility] --> M[Mesolithic base camps] M --> B[Burials microliths fishing] M --> N[Neolithic village] N --> S[Year-round sedentism]
Conclusion
Mesolithic culture was the first step toward sedentism where people reused camps, buried their dead, and widened diet. It was not yet the farming village. Indian examples are Bagor, Ganga cemeteries, and Bhimbetka; Mehrgarh still marks the fuller sedentary turn.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Critically examine the impact of modern democratic institutions on contemporary tribal societies. Illustrate with suitable ethnographic examples.
Next question in the 2023 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Did all Mesolithic people live in villages?
No. Many stayed seasonal. Cemeteries and thick deposits show repeated use, not always twelve-month farming hamlets.
-
Is Bagor a Neolithic site?
It is classed as Mesolithic with later pastoral elements. It is not a mud-brick farming town like Mehrgarh.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Material culture and archaeology -
2023 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Interface between Purushartha and Ashrama -
2023 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Prehistoric rock arts from Uttarakhand -
2023 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
"Indus Valley was the first settlement of the big civilization." Comment critically. -
2023 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically compare Risley's and Sarkar's approaches to the classification of peoples of India. -
2023 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Scheduled areas -
2023 · Q5(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Village as little republic -
2023 · Q5(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Dravidian language and their subgroups
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Material culture and archaeology
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Material culture is objects and built space left by people. Archaeology recovers them in stratigraphy and infers subsistence, rank, and exchange. Binford stressed function; Hodder stressed meaning. Indian illustrations include Hunsgi, Navdatoli, Bhimbetka, and Harappan weights. Ethnography of living potters and hunters checks how objects enter the soil.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Interface between Purushartha and Ashrama
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Purushartha is dharma, artha, kama, and moksha. Ashrama is student, householder, forest-dweller, and renouncer. The householder is the stage that must hold artha and kama under dharma. Dumont and Kane treat the pairing as a civilisational ideal. Karve’s ethnography shows that most lives remain in the household stage.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2023 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Jajmani system : continuity and change
Caste system in India
Jajmani is hereditary service of artisan and serving castes for landed patrons, named by Wiser. Beidelman stressed coercion; Srinivas and Lewis described harvest shares and rites. Ritual calls to barber and priest continue in many villages. Cash wages, mills, land reform, and MGNREGA have broken daily dependence. Epstein’s Mysore villages show the market replacing customary shares.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.