Q5(b) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q5 Q5 →

The losses and gains of erect posture

Topic: Characteristics of Primates. Syllabus: 1.5 Characteristics of Primates; Evolutionary Trend and Primate Taxonomy; Primate Adaptations; (Arboreal and Terrestrial) Primate Taxonomy; Primate Behaviour; Tertiary and Quaternary fossil primates; Living Major Primates; Comparative Anatomy of Man and Apes; Skeletal changes due to erect posture and its implications. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2021 and Characteristics of Primates.

Revision summary

Erect posture frees the hands for tools and carrying. It favours endurance walking and a high visual field. Costs include lumbar strain, difficult birth, and venous problems. The obstetric dilemma pits a narrow pelvis against a large brain. Selection kept the bargain because making and ranging paid.

Model answer

Introduction

Bipedal erect posture is the hominin hallmark. It freed the hands and strained the spine, pelvis, and birth canal. Gains and losses are one design.

Body

Gains

  • Hands free for tools, carrying, and gesture. Washburn and Darwin already tied bipedalism to culture.
  • A high, scanning eye-line and endurance walking, later used by Homo erectus on open landscapes.
  • Thermoregulation in savanna sun is argued: less surface to noon radiation, more sweating skin.

Losses

  • Lumbar lordosis, slipped discs, and osteoarthritis of the lower back and knees.
  • A narrow pelvic inlet versus a large neonatal brain: the obstetric dilemma, with rotational birth and risk to mother and child.
  • Inguinal hernia, varicose veins, and haemorrhoids from vertical viscera and valves.
  • Foot arches and fallen arches; a locked knee that saves energy but fails in injury.

Balance

  • Natural selection kept the posture because foraging and making paid more than a perfect back.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  BP[Bipedalism] --> G[Hands tools endurance]
  BP --> L[Spine pelvis veins feet]
  L --> OB[Obstetric dilemma]

Conclusion

Erect posture bought tools, range, and a scanning stance. It cost backs, births, and veins. The human body is that bargain.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Is race a valid and biologically meaningful concept?

    Next question in the 2021 paper (Q5). View answer →

  • Was bipedalism for running first?

    Early hominins walk. Endurance running is clearer later, with erectus-grade bodies.

  • Can culture remove the losses?

    Midwifery, chairs, and surgery mitigate. They do not rewrite the skeleton.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

    Smell as a signal among non-human primates.

    View answer →

  2. 2025 · Q2(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks

    Discuss the Miocene hominoid remains and their significance in evolution

    View answer →

  3. 2022 · Q2(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Discuss different forms of primate social organisation

    View answer →

  4. 2016 · Q8(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Explain the skeletal changes due to erect posture and their implications.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Animism and Deep Ecology

Religion

Tylor’s animism is belief in spiritual beings as the minimum of religion. Later work reads animism as relating to animals and places as persons. Naess’s Deep Ecology gives nature intrinsic worth beyond human use. The two meet as critiques of a dead, owned environment. They are not the same theory and must not revive Tylor’s ladder.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Marriage Regulations and Alliance Theory

Family

Marriage regulations forbid and prefer categories of spouse. Alliance theory reads marriage as exchange that constitutes society. Lévi-Strauss contrasted restricted and generalised exchange. Kachin and Dravidian systems illustrate positive alliance. Weiner’s Trobriand work shows women as givers, not only gifts.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2021 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Historical Particularism and Franz Boas

Historical particularism (Boas)

Historical particularism treats each culture as a unique historical product. Boas rejected Morgan–Tylor unilinear stages. Diffusion and invention must be proved, not assumed from similarity. Race, language, and culture are independent. Heirs used culture areas and texts; the risk is trait-listing.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.