Revision summary
Binary opposites are the mind’s contrasts, as in own/affine. The incest taboo is the nature/culture cut. Exchange of spouses builds the social whole. Restricted and generalised exchange are the two machines. Cross-cousin terms turn the binary into a marriage rule.
Model answer
Introduction
Lévi-Strauss read kinship as a language of contrasts and as a system of exchange. Binary opposites are how the mind cuts the world; exchange is how groups are tied.
Body
Binary opposites
- Structuralism, from Saussure and Jakobson, treats meaning as difference: raw/cooked, nature/culture, own/affine.
- The incest taboo is the cut that makes culture. Women of one’s group become ‘sisters’; women of the other become spouses.
- Kin terms work as oppositions: parallel versus cross cousin is a binary that organises marriage.
Exchange
- Society begins when groups give spouses. The gift of women is the elementary social contract in his formula.
- Restricted exchange is two-sided swapping. Generalised exchange is a delayed circle, often with status.
- Cross-cousin marriage is the operator that turns opposition into repeating alliance.
How they join
- Binary: sister versus wife. Exchange: my sister’s marriage makes me affine to another line.
- The Elementary Structures of Kinship is this algebra. Later Needham said ethnography is messier than the grid.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD LS[Levi-Strauss] --> BIN[Binary nature culture own affine] LS --> EX[Spouse exchange] BIN --> INC[Incest cut] EX --> CC[Cross cousin alliance]
Conclusion
For Lévi-Strauss, kinship thinks in binaries and binds groups by exchanging spouses. The incest cut and cross-cousin rule are the hinge between opposition and alliance.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Describe the evolution of Fieldwork tradition in Anthropology.
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q4). View answer →
-
Must every society have only two categories?
The method looks for contrasts. Real vocabularies can be richer.
-
Is exchange only of women?
That is his classical wording. Alliance can be restated as exchange of rights in persons.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2024 · Q6(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
How does Lévi-Strauss look at the Tsimshian myth of Asdiwal? Critically discuss Lévi-Strauss' theory of structuralism in the light of his study of mythologies. -
2021 · Q8(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Explain the structural analysis of kinship as proposed by Levi-Strauss
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Differences between Social Anthropology and Sociology.
The Nature of Society
Social anthropology grew from intensive fieldwork in small-scale societies. Sociology grew from industrial class, state, and survey. Malinowski versus Durkheim is the textbook origin split. Srinivas and Béteille show the Indian overlap. The wall is departmental, not a law of nature.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Cultural Relativism
The Nature of Culture
Relativism asks that custom be read in its own history. Boas used it against unilinear racial stages. Herskovits and Benedict spread it as method and public teaching. It is a brake on ethnocentrism, not a moral blank cheque. Rights debates mark its political edge.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Lineage and Clan
Kinship
Lineage members can show genealogical links to an ancestor. Clan members share a putative ancestor and often a totem. Lineages nest inside clans in many segmentary systems. Nuer feud and fusion made the distinction famous. Both groups are commonly exogamous.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.