Revision summary
Relativism asks that custom be read in its own history. Boas used it against unilinear racial stages. Herskovits and Benedict spread it as method and public teaching. It is a brake on ethnocentrism, not a moral blank cheque. Rights debates mark its political edge.
Model answer
Introduction
Cultural relativism says a custom must be understood in its own cultural frame before it is ranked. It was Boas’s answer to ethnocentric ladders.
Body
The claim
- Franz Boas and Herskovits taught that values are historically local. Potlatch or caste purity is not a failed Europe.
- Method: hold judgment while the ethnography is built. Benedict’s Patterns of Culture popularised the stance.
Limits
- Relativism is a research ethic, not a ban on criticising violence.
- Universalists in human rights, and Sahlins versus Obeyesekere on Captain Cook, show the fight over how far local meaning goes.
- Female genital cutting and untouchability are understood locally and still judged in law and policy.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD CR[Cultural relativism] --> B[Boas Herskovits] CR --> M[Understand in context] CR --> L[Not a ban on judgment]
Conclusion
Cultural relativism blocks racial ranking of whole peoples. It does not make every practice beyond critique once the local meaning is known.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Lineage and Clan
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q1). View answer →
-
Does relativism mean anything goes?
No. It means understand first. Law and ethics may still constrain harm.
-
Is it the same as moral nihilism?
No. It is methodological humility, not the claim that morals are nothing.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q1(e) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Culture and embodiment. -
2024 · Q1(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Attributes of culture -
2024 · Q1(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Critical perspective on avoidance and joking relationship -
2024 · Q5(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Cultural relevance of the Kula -
2023 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
William Ogburn and Cultural lag. -
2023 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks
Critically examine Arjun Appadurai's conceptualization of the global cultural economy. -
2022 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks
Discuss the historical and cultural contexts that led to superseding ethnocentrism with cultural relativism in anthropology -
2021 · Q5(c) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Is race a valid and biologically meaningful concept?
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Differences between Social Anthropology and Sociology.
The Nature of Society
Social anthropology grew from intensive fieldwork in small-scale societies. Sociology grew from industrial class, state, and survey. Malinowski versus Durkheim is the textbook origin split. Srinivas and Béteille show the Indian overlap. The wall is departmental, not a law of nature.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Lineage and Clan
Kinship
Lineage members can show genealogical links to an ancestor. Clan members share a putative ancestor and often a totem. Lineages nest inside clans in many segmentary systems. Nuer feud and fusion made the distinction famous. Both groups are commonly exogamous.
Q1(d) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Totemism
Religion
A totem is an emblem or kin-like species for a group. Durkheim read it as the clan worshipping itself. Lévi-Strauss read it as a system of differences. Taboo and exogamy often travel with the emblem. Indian tribal clans use totems as identity, not as science of animals.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.